Where is the play on the bottom. Performance at the bottom. The main characters and their characteristics

An unexpected read for me. The characters in this production are older than indicated in the play. When young people talk about the prospects of getting out of the shelter, that’s one thing. When people who have lived speak, the hopelessness really weighs on them. According to the play, it’s a pity that quite young lives are burning, but here it’s just like a last desperate attempt to somehow change something. At the same time, there is a lot of life in this shelter, in this basement. Passions still rage, but don’t you want love and attention at any age? I repeat, in terms of energy and excitement of the play, the actors of this performance will give many young people a head start, but I really got a different look at the play. Same Nastya. When a young girl fantasizes and shouts that “I had it, I had it” - well, you relate to these fantasies. Big deal. There will be more. Even if it’s not as he dreams, even if it’s not Raul, but still... And even if it doesn’t happen, there are chances. And when to dream, if not in youth? When a lady far from her youth dreams so infantilely, despite the fact that the image itself is on the verge of caricature, then her “was, was” is a knife to the heart. She clings to these fantasies because, of course, nothing happened, but you also understand that now it’s unlikely that anything will happen. It's like a straw. I just don’t even want to laugh, but for the evil comments of the “roommates” I really want to kill them all with my own hands. A surprisingly tragic image, despite all the external caricature... And the same actor - somehow the ending of his “storyline” is even more logical. The same Ash - he really is ashes. No, it flares up, it burns, but now it seems that I’ve spent my whole life so uselessly, why show off now. And if you think with 30-year-old Ash, what will he be like there, in prison, and after? How will it turn out? Then you worry more intensely - this is the end! Now there is no new life... All that remains is to smolder...
And these dances... Young people can dance simply out of youthful strength, but then there’s a desperate attempt to forget, to drown out, they’ve “gone”... All their lives like this... Not because they want to dance, but because otherwise it’s unbearable! In the end I really didn’t want to clap to this dance... I just really want to write “death”...
And the very premises of the theater - the basement, the low ceiling - everything intensifies this feeling of burden, the burden of life. No matter how you dream, no matter how your blood boils. At any age you want to live and dream, but life is such a thing that it also mows down everyone...

Vasilisa and Natasha - Olga Ivanova and Tamara Kudryashova. Not girls, that’s why their showdowns are even more scary. Not momentary desire and jealousy, they know what they are sharing. Well, who... And this calculation of Vasilisa is especially felt - an experienced manager draws up a plan. I carried it for a long time, it was not born instantly. And love here is not falling in love, there is also insult clearly mixed in. And Natasha continues to dream, although it would seem... What if someone takes your hand and leads you away... Hope is indestructible... And after all, both beauties... Anyone would consider it an honor to bring someone like her into the house as a mistress...
Medvedev - Denis Nagretdinov. Funny. And it seems like you have to keep your face - the bosses! And he is clearly tied up here with all the affairs and family ties. Spin as you please. Well, I didn’t get out of it...
Luka - Sergei Borodinov. What a wonderful image! For some reason I perceive Borodinov as quite brutal, but he is so bright! The image is ageless and timeless. And you can’t call him blessed - he’s quite an ordinary peasant, and he says “usually” and does not prophesy. But it’s so difficult! I really liked it!
Vaska Ash - Alexander Naumov. The energy is very strong! He should move mountains! But it was necessary earlier, earlier...
Tick ​​- Alexey Vanin. Embittered... In my opinion, including even at his wife, who leaves him. She didn’t expect affection from him, but clearly he was so wilted without her... Did he feed on her like a vampire?... In the role of his wife - Tatyana Gorodetskaya.
Bubnov - Oleg Zadorin. To be honest, I would give the role of Luke to this actor. He says so reasonable and reasonable things. And you readily believe that you left everything to your wife - because you calculated everything wisely. He even justified this life at the bottom - well, I don’t like to work! Ideological beggar :-))))))
Satin - Evgeny Bakalov.
Actor - Alexander Zadokhin. Beautiful image. Art still lives in him! And even if the audience is no longer the same as the one who carried him in their arms, alcohol still cannot kill artistry. But the question is why live? Old memories of success? And I even suspect that he doesn’t remember the fact of being carried in the arms of fans, but the fact that he played so that they would carry him! I needed it! Burned hearts with a verb! And despair that he forgets words. How can you play on stage if your memory fails, if you don’t remember your favorite poems?!!! What could be worse? And probably, it was so easy for him to believe in the “promised land”, which Luke did not show him on the “map”. Since there is no hospital where they will cure, where they will help, there is no this promised land, then why is all this now? I stopped dreaming, so what remains? "Oh, I ruined the song! You fool!"
Baron - Vyacheslav Grishechkin. Obviously from another world. With this importance, here inappropriate, with a readiness for humiliation. “You would have asked me to bark then” - now why? What's the point in beating someone who is down? But the meager little soul is ready to humiliate others too. How can you not laugh at Nastya? Voulez Vous Coucher Avec Moi - how the French language just hurts the ear. Let him at least become a little taller than the rest.
Asanka - Farid Tagiyev. A wonderful Tatar came out!! The most colorful!
Nastya - Galina Galkina. She is a textured actress and her roles often have a comedic twist. And here, at first glance, it seems like you really want to laugh at her. But it’s not funny at all... You can survive by living in the past, in memories. And here is an attempt to survive, clinging even to what did not exist, and then screaming in absolute despair that “it was, it was!!” And she’s not convincing these fellow inmates, sorry, her dorm neighbors, she’s convincing herself. Because if these dreams are taken away from her, then there will be nothing at all!
Kvashnya - Irina Sushina. A thrifty and rather kind young lady. But he also knows his own worth, so what?
Alyoshka - Maxim Lakomkin. The role is small. but also bright.
Baby - Vadim Sokolov. What is he doing here?.... Get out of here...

Maxim Gorky's play "At the Lower Depths" is still the most successful drama in the collection of his works. She won the favor of the public during the author’s lifetime; the writer himself even described the performances in other books, ironizing about his fame. So why did this work captivate people so much?

The play was written at the end of 1901 - beginning of 1902. This work was not an obsession or a gust of inspiration, as is usually the case with creative people. On the contrary, it was written specifically for a troupe of actors from the Moscow Art Theater, created to enrich the culture of all classes of society. Gorky could not imagine what would come of it, but he realized the desired idea of ​​​​creating a play about tramps, where about two dozen characters would be present.

The fate of Gorky's play cannot be called the final and irrevocable triumph of his creative genius. There were different opinions. People were delighted or criticized such a controversial creation. It survived bans and censorship, and to this day everyone understands the meaning of the drama in their own way.

Meaning of the name

The meaning of the title of the play “At the Bottom” personifies the social position of all the characters in the work. The title gives an ambiguous first impression, since there is no specific mention of what day we are talking about. The author gives the reader the opportunity to use his imagination and guess what his work is about.

Today, many literary scholars agree that the author meant that his heroes are at the bottom of life in the social, financial and moral sense. This is the meaning of the name.

Genre, direction, composition

The play is written in a genre called “social and philosophical drama.” The author touches on precisely such topics and problems. His direction can be designated as “critical realism,” although some researchers insist on the formulation “socialist realism,” since the writer focused the public’s attention on social injustice and the eternal conflict between the poor and the rich. Thus, his work took on an ideological connotation, because at that time the confrontation between the nobility and the common people in Russia was only heating up.

The composition of the work is linear, since all actions are chronologically consistent and form a single thread of the narrative.

The essence of the work

The essence of Maxim Gorky's play lies in the depiction of the bottom and its inhabitants. Show readers in the play's characters the marginalized, people humiliated by life and fate, rejected by society and who have broken ties with it. Despite the smoldering flame of hope - having no future. They live, argue about love, honesty, truth, justice, but their words are just empty words for this world and even for their own destinies.

Everything that happens in the play has only one purpose: to show the clash of philosophical views and positions, as well as to illustrate the dramas of outcast people to whom no one lends a helping hand.

The main characters and their characteristics

The inhabitants of the bottom are people with different life principles and beliefs, but they are all united by one condition: they are mired in poverty, which gradually deprives them of dignity, hope and self-confidence. She corrupts them, dooming the victims to certain death.

1. Mite– works as a mechanic, 40 years old. Married to Anna (30 years old), who suffers from consumption. The relationship with his wife is the main characterizing detail. Kleshch's complete indifference to her well-being, frequent beatings and humiliation speak of his cruelty and callousness. After Anna's death, the man was forced to sell his work tools in order to bury her. And only the lack of work unsettled him a little. Fate leaves the hero without a chance to get out of the shelter and without prospects for a further successful life.
2. Bubnov- a 45-year-old man. Previously the owner of a fur workshop. He is dissatisfied with his current life, but tries to maintain his potential to return to normal society. Lost possession due to divorce, as the documents were issued in the name of his wife. Lives in a shelter and sews hats.
3. Satin- about 40 years old, drinks until he loses his memory and plays cards where he cheats for a living. I read a lot of books, which I constantly remind not so much of my neighbors as of myself as a consolation that all is not lost. Served 5 years in prison for manslaughter committed during a fight for his sister's honor. Despite his education and occasional fall, he does not recognize honest ways of living.
4. Luke- a wanderer aged 60 years. He appeared unexpectedly for the residents of the shelter. He behaves intelligently, consoles and calms everyone around, but as if he came with a specific purpose. He tries to improve relations with everyone by giving advice, which incites even more disputes. A hero of a neutral character, despite his kind tone, always makes one want to doubt the purity of his intentions. Based on his stories, it can be assumed that he served time in prison, but escaped from there.
5. Ash– name is Vasily, 28 years old. He constantly steals, but, despite the dishonest way of earning money, he has his own philosophical point of view, like everyone else. He wants to get out of the shelter and start a new life. He was imprisoned several times. He has a certain position in this society due to his secret relationship with the married Vasilisa, which everyone knows about. At the beginning of the play, the heroes separate, and Ash tries to look after Natasha in order to take her away from the shelter, but in a fight he kills Kostylev and goes to prison at the end of the play.
6. Nastya– young girl, 24 years old. Based on her treatment and conversations, we can conclude that she works as a call girl. Constantly wants attention, to be needed. She has a connection with the Baron, but not the one she comes up with in her fantasies after reading romance novels. In fact, she endures rudeness and disrespect from her boyfriend, while giving him money for alcohol. All her behavior is continuous complaints about life and requests for pity.
7. Baron– 33 years old, drinks, but due to unfortunate circumstances. He constantly reminds of his noble roots, which once helped him become a wealthy official, but were not of particular significance when accused of embezzlement of public funds, which is why the hero went to prison, remaining a beggar. He has a love relationship with Nastya, but takes them for granted, transfers all his responsibilities to the girl, and constantly takes money for drinking.
8. Anna– Kleshch’s wife, 30 years old, suffers from consumption. At the beginning of the play he is in a dying state, but does not live to the end. For all the heroes, the flophouse is an unsuccessful piece of “interior”, making unnecessary sounds and taking up space. Until her death she hopes for a manifestation of her husband’s love, but dies in the corner from indifference, beatings and humiliation, which may have given rise to the disease.
9. Actor– male, approximately 40 years old. Just like all the residents of the shelter, he always remembers his past life. A kind and fair person, but excessively sorry for himself. He wants to stop drinking, having learned from Luke about a hospital for alcoholics in some city. He begins to save money, but, not having time to find out the location of the hospital before the wanderer leaves, the hero despairs and commits suicide.
10. Kostylev– Vasilisa’s husband, a 54-year-old shelter owner. He perceives people only as walking wallets, loves to remind people of debts and assert himself at the expense of the baseness of his own residents. Tries to hide his true attitude behind a mask of kindness. He suspects his wife of cheating with Ash, which is why he constantly listens to sounds outside his door. He believes that he should be grateful for the overnight stay. Vasilisa and her sister Natasha are treated no better than the drunkards who live at his expense. Buys things that Ash steals, but hides it. Due to his own stupidity, he dies at the hands of Ash in a fight.
11. Vasilisa Karpovna - Kostylev's wife, 26 years old. She is no different from her husband, but she hates him with all her heart. She secretly cheats on her husband with Ash and persuades her lover to kill her husband, promising that he will not be sent to prison. And he doesn’t feel any feelings towards his sister except envy and malice, which is why she gets the worst of it. Looks for benefit in everything.
12. Natasha– Vasilisa’s sister, 20 years old. The “purest” soul of the shelter. Endures bullying from Vasilisa and her husband. She cannot trust Ash with his desire to take her away, knowing all the meanness of people. Although she herself understands that she will be lost. Helps residents selflessly. He is going to meet Vaska halfway to leave, but he ends up in the hospital after Kostylev’s death and goes missing.
13. Kvashnya– a 40-year-old dumpling seller who experienced the power of her husband, who beat her during 8 years of marriage. Helps the residents of the shelter, sometimes trying to put the house in order. She argues with everyone and is not going to get married anymore, remembering her late tyrant husband. Over the course of the play, their relationship with Medvedev develops. At the very end, Kvashnya marries a policeman, whom she herself begins to beat due to her addiction to alcohol.
14. Medvedev- uncle of sisters Vasilisa and Natasha, policeman, 50 years old. Throughout the entire play, she tries to woo Kvashnya, promising that she will not be like her ex-husband. She knows that her niece is being beaten by her older sister, but does not intervene. Knows about all the machinations of Kostylev, Vasilisa and Ash. At the end of the play, he marries Kvashnya and begins to drink, for which his wife beats him.
15. Alyoshka- shoemaker, 20 years old, drinks. He says that he doesn’t need anything, that he is disappointed in life. He drinks out of despair and plays the harmonica. Due to riotous behavior and drunkenness, he often ends up in the police station.
16. Tatar- also lives in a shelter, works as a housekeeper. He loves to play cards with Satin and Baron, but is always indignant at their dishonest play. An honest person does not understand swindlers. Constantly talks about laws and honors them. At the end of the play, Crooked Craw hits him and breaks his arm.
17. Crooked Goiter- another little-known inhabitant of the shelter, the housekeeper. Not as honest as Tatar. He also likes to pass the time playing cards, is calm about the cheating of Satin and Baron, and finds excuses for them. He beats Tatarin and breaks his arm, which causes him to have a conflict with policeman Medvedev. At the end of the play he sings a song with the others.

Themes

Despite the seemingly fairly simple plot and the absence of sharp climactic turns, the work is replete with themes that provide food for thought.

1. Theme of hope stretches through the entire play until the very denouement. She hovers in the mood of the work, but not once does anyone mention her intention to get out of the shelter. Hope is present in every dialogue of the inhabitants, but only indirectly. Just as each of them once fell to the bottom, so someday they dream of getting out of there. In everyone there glimmers a small opportunity to return again to a past life, where everyone was happy, although they did not appreciate it.
2. Fate theme is also quite important in the play. It defines the role of evil fate and its meaning for the heroes. Fate can be the driving force in a work that could not be changed, that brought all the inhabitants together. Or that circumstance, always subject to change, which had to be overcome in order to be able to achieve great success. From the lives of the inhabitants, one can understand that they have accepted their fate and are trying to change it only in the opposite direction, believing that they have nowhere to fall lower. If one of the residents tries to make an attempt to change their position and get out of the bottom, they collapse. Perhaps the author wanted to show in this way that they deserved such a fate.
3. Theme of the meaning of life looks quite superficial in the play, but if you think about it, you can understand the reason for such an attitude towards the life of the shack’s heroes. Everyone considers the current state of affairs to be the bottom from which there is no way out: neither down, nor, especially, up. The characters, despite different age categories, are disappointed in life. They lost interest in her, and stopped seeing any meaning in their own existence, let alone sympathy for each other. They do not strive for another fate because they cannot imagine it. Only alcohol sometimes adds color to existence, which is why sleepovers love to drink.
4. Theme of truth and lies in the play is the main idea of ​​the author. This topic is a philosophical question in Gorky’s work, which he reflects on through the lips of the characters. If we talk about truth in dialogues, then its boundaries are erased, because sometimes the characters say absurd things. However, their words contain secrets and mysteries that are revealed to us as the plot of the work progresses. The author raises this topic in the play, as he considers the truth as a way to save the inhabitants. Show the heroes the real state of affairs, opening their eyes to the world and to their own lives, which they lose every day in the hut? Or hide the truth under the guise of lies and pretense, because it’s easier for them? Everyone chooses the answer independently, but the author makes it clear that he likes the first option.
5. Theme of love and feelings touches in the work because it makes it possible to understand the relationships between the inhabitants. There is absolutely no love in a shelter, even between spouses, and it is unlikely to have the opportunity to appear there. The place itself seems to be saturated with hatred. All were united only by a common living space and a sense of injustice of fate. There is indifference in the air, both towards healthy and sick people. Only squabbles, like dogs squabbling, amuse the night shelters. Along with interest in life, the colors of emotions and feelings are lost.

Problems

The play has a rich range of issues. Maxim Gorky tried in one work to indicate the moral problems that were relevant at that time, which, however, still exist to this day.

1. The first problem is conflict between the inhabitants of the shelter, not only with each other, but also with life. From the dialogues between the characters you can understand their relationship. Constant quarrels, differences of opinion, basic debts lead to eternal squabbles, which is a mistake in this case. The homeless shelters need to learn to live under one roof in harmony. Mutual assistance will make life easier and change the general atmosphere. The problem of social conflict is the destruction of any society. The poor are united by a common problem, but instead of solving it, they create new ones through common efforts. The conflict with life lies in the lack of an adequate perception of it. Former people are offended by life, which is why they do not take further steps towards creating a different future and simply go with the flow.
2. Another problem can be identified as a pressing question: “ Truth or Compassion?. The author creates a reason for reflection: to show the heroes the realities of life or to sympathize with such a fate? In the drama, someone suffers from physical or psychological abuse, and someone dies in agony, but receives his share of compassion, and this reduces his suffering. Each person has his own view of the current situation, and we react based on our feelings. The writer, in Satin’s monologue and the disappearance of the wanderer, made it clear whose side he was on. Luka acts as Gorky's antagonist, trying to bring the inhabitants back to life, show the truth and console the suffering.
3. Also raised in the play problem of humanism. More precisely, its absence. Returning again to the relationship between the inhabitants, and their relationship to themselves, we can consider this problem from two positions. The lack of humanity on the part of the heroes towards each other can be seen in the situation with the dying Anna, to which no one pays attention. During Vasilisa’s bullying of her sister Natasha and Nastya’s humiliation. An opinion is emerging that if people are at the bottom, then they don’t need any more help, it’s every man for himself. This cruelty to themselves is determined by their current lifestyle - constant drinking, fights, which carry disappointment and loss of meaning in life. Existence ceases to be the highest value when there is no goal towards it.
4. The problem of immorality rises in connection with the lifestyle that residents lead based on social location. Nastya's work as a call girl, playing cards for money, drinking alcohol with the ensuing consequences in the form of fights and being taken to the police, theft - all these are the consequences of poverty. The author shows this behavior as a typical phenomenon for people who find themselves at the bottom of society.

The meaning of the play

The idea of ​​Gorky's play is that all people are absolutely the same, regardless of their social and financial status. Everyone consists of flesh and blood, the differences lie only in upbringing and character, which give us the opportunity to react differently to current situations and act based on them. No matter who you are, life can change in an instant. Any of us, having lost everything we had in the past, having sunk to the bottom, will lose ourselves. There will no longer be any point in keeping oneself within the bounds of social decency, looking appropriate and behaving accordingly. When a person loses the values ​​​​established by others, he becomes confused and falls out of reality, as happened with the heroes.

The main idea is that life can break any person. Make him indifferent, bitter, having lost any incentive to exist. Of course, an indifferent society will be to blame for many of his troubles, which will only push the falling one. However, the broken poor are often themselves to blame for the fact that they cannot rise up, because it is difficult to find someone to blame for their laziness, depravity and indifference to everything.

Gorky's author's position is expressed in Satin's monologue, which scatters into aphorisms. “Man – sounds proud!” - he exclaims. The writer wants to show how to treat people in order to appeal to their dignity and strength. Endless regret without concrete practical steps will only harm the poor man, because he will continue to feel sorry for himself rather than work to get out of the vicious circle of poverty. This is the philosophical meaning of drama. In the debate about true and false humanism in society, the winner is the one who speaks directly and honestly, even at the risk of incurring indignation. Gorky in one of Satin’s monologues connects truth and lies with human freedom. Independence comes only at the cost of comprehension and search for truth.

Conclusion

Each reader will draw his own specific conclusion. The play “At the Bottom” can help a person understand that in life it is always worth striving for something, because it gives strength to move on without looking back. Don't stop thinking that nothing will work out.

Using the example of all the heroes, one can see absolute inaction and disinterest in their own fate. Regardless of age and gender, they are simply mired in their current situation, making the excuse that it is too late to resist and start all over again. A person himself must have the desire to change his future, and in case of any failure, do not blame life, do not be offended by it, but gain experience by experiencing the problem. The inhabitants of the shelter believe that suddenly, for their suffering in the basement, a miracle should fall on them that will bring them a new life, as it happens - Luka appears to them, wanting to cheer up all the despairing, help with advice to make life better. But they forgot that words cannot help the fallen man; he extended his hand to them, but no one took it. And everyone is just waiting for action from anyone, but not from themselves.

Criticism

It cannot be said that before the birth of his legendary play, Gorky did not have any popularity in society. But, it can be emphasized that interest in him increased precisely because of this work.

Gorky managed to show everyday, everyday things surrounding dirty, uneducated people from a new angle. He knew what he was writing about, since he himself had experience in achieving his position in society; after all, he was from the common people and an orphan. There is no exact explanation why the works of Maxim Gorky were so popular and made such a strong impression on the public, because he was not an innovator of any genre, writing about all known things. But Gorky’s work was fashionable at that time, society liked to read his works and attend theatrical performances based on his creations. It can be assumed that the degree of social tension in Russia was rising, and many were dissatisfied with the established order in the country. The monarchy had exhausted itself, and popular actions in subsequent years were harshly suppressed, and therefore many people gladly looked for disadvantages in the existing system, as if reinforcing their own conclusions.

The peculiarities of the play lie in the way of presentation and presentation of the characters' characters, in the harmonious use of descriptions. One of the problems raised in the work is the individuality of each hero and his struggle for it. Artistic tropes and stylistic figures very accurately depict the living conditions of the characters, because the author saw all these details personally.

Interesting? Save it on your wall!

I watched “At the Bottom” with my son and niece (schoolchildren). Amazing performance. The acting is amazing. Bravo! The main thing is that the guys are not disappointed, comparing with what they read from Gorky. In general, the theater did not disappoint. Thank you very much to the whole team.

Lydia K., September 19, 2018

...The performance is built on monologues that are very strong and goosebumps, touching the original texts of the author. There were a lot of schoolchildren in the hall and my first thought was: if I were 16, I wouldn’t understand anything. But apparently, when it’s already a little more than 16 the question: “What does a person live for?” It often sounds in people's heads and that's why they write about it and play it. But, in general, everything is simple - “a person lives for the best,” each with his own truth and for everyone it is real. I really want there to always be a kind of Luka in life, who will not look for a trick in everyone, but will act “like acid on a rusty coin.” But it’s bitter only because it’s about life!!! How important a kind word is! A banal “don’t be upset, you’ll get through it” can give a lot of strength and help someone. I'm not Luka, but it's still important to someone.

GBOU School 283

“The theater is already full. The boxes are shining." On October 6, a group of 9th grade “I” students visited the Moscow Art Theater named after. M. Gorky. The guys watched a performance based on the play by A.M. Gorky "At the Bottom". The modern production has not spoiled the idea of ​​the plot and the problem of the drama. The musical performance, the excellent acting, the scenery - all this left a pleasant impression. The guys spent the Saturday evening of the first day of vacation with benefit.

Marina M.

I love the Moscow Art Theater for its minimum of scenery and maximum of acting. “The Master and Margarita” - tin shields, “At the Bottom” - iron bunks. That's all! And, in fact, nothing more is needed. And to Boris Bachurin and Ivan Krivoruchko - a personal “Bravo”. Standing.

Yana

I ask each and everyone who is interested in my opinion as a layman... Read “At the Lower Depths” or urgently watch this production at the Moscow Art Theater. M. Gorky. To goosebumps, to tears, from the tire to the very depths... I have been visiting the theater for 5 years, maybe a little less, consistently 1-3 times a month... It is extremely rare that I was dissatisfied, however, such (positive) in terms of its strength, I experienced super-emotions, like today, only twice... Smoothly flowing to today: 11 out of 20 main characters are honored and people's artists of Russia, and in this case these are not regalia, but true merits. When the emphasis of gouache falls not on the stage decorations and outfit ambiance, but on the monologues/dialogues and musical accompaniment; when light determines everything and there is no change in attributes. Iron bunks, white robes of the characters against the backdrop of a huge black stage - all this only complements the unique images played by the best theater actors with all dedication and love for people and the great Maxim Gorky. I am each of them, maybe you are too?

Julia

Very cool, and the whole performance gives me goosebumps...

Julia

A wonderful evening at the Moscow Art Theater. M. Gorky! Thank you. I liked the play “At the Lower Depths”, the acting is mesmerizing. I want to visit theaters again and again!

Olga Segeevna

“At the Lower Depths” (Moscow Art Theater named after Gorky) is a classic production strictly based on the play. A minimum of scenery (4 bunk beds), inconspicuous costumes - all this puts emphasis on the personality and fate of the heroes. The performance makes you think about your life, about humanity, about the soul. From the lips of the heroes, current problems of modern society are heard. But the play was written in 1902, but everything is the same as it is now. The acting is certainly excellent... Everyone should watch “At the Bottom”...