The idea of ​​the work is a wild landowner. Saltykov-Shchedrin, “Wild Landowner”: analysis. Analysis of the Wild Landowner

Main idea

The fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin is a caustic satire on the ruling class. All the action described in it takes place as if within the framework of one estate, but in fact, it extends far beyond the boundaries of the entire province. The author began writing such “fairy tales” in his final period of creativity.

In them, he confidently raised topics that worried society in the second half of the 19th century.

The main problem of all his “fairy tales” is the relationship between the exploited and the exploiters.

Likewise, the story of the “Wild Landowner” was intended to ridicule the social system based on the exploitation of the peasants. The author begins his work as an ordinary fairy tale with the words: “In a certain kingdom, in a certain state, once upon a time there lived...” This technique of using traditional fairy-tale terms is manifested in almost all of his fairy tales.

From the first lines it becomes clear that we are talking about a stupid and lazy person. The landowner Saltykov-Shchedrin was so ungrateful that he regarded the work of his peasants as something philistine. It seemed to him that the “men” were nothing but worries.

They eat a lot, waste a lot of water, burn a lot of candles, litter the land. In a word, the main character was completely dissatisfied with the “chaff spirit.”

As soon as he got rid of them, it became easier for him to breathe and live freely.

But here’s the problem: without the peasants, there was no farm. There was no one to take care of the fertile lands, livestock and garden. He himself also gradually degraded, eating only candies and gingerbread.

He stopped washing and combing his hair, began to grow hair, walk on all fours, and eventually became wild. According to the author, it was thanks to the people that landowners like him had moral and material benefits. With the disappearance of the people, he lost these benefits.

It is not without reason that the author came up with such a name for his “landowner” - Prince Urus-Kuchum-Kildibaev. This is a true nobleman who is proud of his roots and hates ordinary men. Without a “servile spirit” the air seems pure and pure to him.

However, with the disappearance of the peasants, the food on the market also disappears, and therefore he has to go hunting in the forest himself. The landowner is not accustomed to such work. All his life he did nothing but lie on his estate and play grand solitaire.

In fact, by describing all these details, Saltykov-Shchedrin gradually reveals the main goal of his tale. He condemns not only the landowner for his idle lifestyle, but also the long-suffering of the peasants, their slavish worldview. By returning the “men” to their homes, the author expresses faith in the triumph of freedom.

(No Ratings Yet)

Saltykov-Shchedrin's fairy tales, intended for adults, introduce the peculiarities of Russian society better than historical works. The story of the wild landowner is similar to an ordinary fairy tale, but it combines reality with fiction. The landowner, who becomes the hero of the story, often reads the actually existing reactionary newspaper “Vest”.

Left alone, the landowner at first rejoices that his wish has come true. Later comes the realization of one's own stupidity. The swaggering guests do not hesitate to tell him about his stupidity, realizing that the landowner has only candy left from the treats. This is also the official opinion of the police officer who collects taxes, who understands the inseparability of peasant taxes from the stability of the state.

But the landowner does not heed the voice of reason and does not listen to other people's advice. He remains strong-willed and dreams of fantastic foreign cars designed to replace men. A naive dreamer does not realize that in reality he is not able to wash himself. He is completely helpless because he doesn’t know how to do anything.

The fairy tale ends sadly: the stubborn man grows fur, gets on all fours and begins to throw himself at people. It turned out that the gentleman, noble on the outside, had the essence of a simple creature. He remained human as long as he was served food on a plate and dressed in clean clothes.

The higher authorities decided to return the peasants to the estate so that they would work, pay taxes to the treasury and produce food for their owners.

But the landowner remained wild forever. He was caught and cleaned, but he still gravitates towards forest life and does not like to wash himself. This is the hero: a ruler in the serf world, but under the care of a simple peasant, Senka.

The author laughs at the morals of Russian society. He sympathizes with the peasants and accuses them of being too patient and submissive. At the same time, the writer demonstrates the powerlessness of landowners who cannot live without servants. The tales of Saltykov-Shchedrin call for respect for the people, which is the basis that supports the well-being of such landowners.

Option 2

Saltykov-Shchedrin wrote his famous work, which was called “The Wild Landowner,” in 1869. There he examines quite topical issues that are relevant both at that time and now. For him, the genre of fairy tales is central, which he writes far from being for children. The author juxtaposes the tragic with the comic in his work, using techniques such as grotesque and hyperbole, as well as Aesopian language. Thus, he ridicules the autocracy and serfdom that still exist in the country.

At the center of events is an ordinary landowner who takes special pride in the fact that noble blood flows in his veins. His goal is simply to pamper the body, relax and be yourself. He is actually resting and he can afford such a lifestyle only thanks to the men, whom he treats very cruelly; he cannot even stand the spirit of ordinary men.

And so the landowner’s desire is fulfilled, and he is left alone, while God fulfilled not the desire of the landowner, but the desire of the peasants, who are completely exhausted from constant control and supervision.

Thus, Shchedrin ridicules the fate of the Russian people, which is quite difficult. Only after a while does the hero realize that he has committed real stupidity.

And in the end, the landowner has completely gone wild, inside the supreme being of man, the most ordinary animal is hidden, which lives only to fulfill its desires.

The hero has been restored to serf society, and a simple Russian peasant named Senka will take care of him.

The fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” is one of the brilliant works of a writer working in the genre of satire. He has to ridicule the socio-political system, he has to expose the existing morals and types of society, in which there is a rather strange morality that is not subject to comprehension. It shows how helpless landowners are, who are constantly looked after by simple serfs. All this is ridiculed by the author, who is forced to live in such a society; it is difficult for him to cope with the existing situation, so he tries to show its absurdity and condemn what is happening in society.

Analysis of the Wild Landowner

One of Saltykov-Shchedrin’s best works was published in 1869 and is called the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner.” This work can be classified as satire. Why a fairy tale? The author chose this genre for a reason; in this way he bypassed censorship. The heroes of the work do not have names. A kind of hint from the author that the landowner is a composite image and corresponds to many landowners in Rus' in the 19th century. Well, take the rest of the heroes, men and Senka, these are peasants. The author raises a very interesting topic. The main thing for the author is that the peasant, honest and hardworking people are always higher in everything than the nobles.

Thanks to the fairy tale genre, the author's work is very simple and full of irony and various artistic details. With the help of details, the author can very clearly convey the images of the characters. For example, he calls the landowner stupid and soft-bodied. Who knew no grief and enjoyed life.

The main problem of this work is the difficult life of ordinary people. In the author’s fairy tale, the landowner appears as a soulless and cruel monster; all he does is humiliate the poor peasants and try to take away even the last thing from them. The peasants prayed, there was nothing else they could do, they, as people, wanted a normal life. The landowner wanted to get rid of them and in the end, God fulfilled the desire of the peasants to live better and the desire of the landowner to get rid of the peasants. After this, it becomes clear that the entire luxurious life of the landowner is provided by the peasants. With the disappearance of the “slaves”, life changed, now the landowner became like an animal. He changed in appearance, became scarier, overgrown, and stopped eating normally. The men disappeared and life changed from bright colors to gray and dull ones. Even spending time as before, in entertainment, the landowner feels that it’s still not the same. The author reveals the real meaning of the work, which relates to real life. The boyars and landowners oppress the peasants and do not consider them as people. But, in the absence of “slaves,” they cannot live a normal life, because it is the peasants and workers who provide all the good for them personally and for the country. And the upper strata of society bring nothing more than problems and misfortunes.

The people in this work, namely the peasants, are honest people, open and loving to work. With the help of their labor, the landowner lived happily ever after. By the way, the author shows the peasants not just as one thoughtless crowd, but as smart and insightful people. In this work, justice is very important for the peasants. They considered this attitude towards themselves unfair and therefore asked God for help.

Saltykov-Shchedrin himself has great respect for the peasants, which he shows in the work. This can be seen, very clearly, when the landowner disappeared and lived without peasants and at the time when he returned. As a result, it turns out that the author leads the reader to one true opinion. It is not high-ranking officials, not officials who decide the fate of the country and each of the landowners, but the peasants. All the well-being and all the benefits of rich people rest on them. This is the main idea of ​​the work.

A brief analysis of Saltykov-Shchedrin’s fairy tale “The Wild Landowner”: idea, problems, themes, image of the people

The fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” was published by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin in 1869. This work is a satire on the Russian landowner and the ordinary Russian people. In order to bypass censorship, the writer chose a specific genre, “fairy tale,” within which a deliberate fable is described. In the work, the author does not give his characters names, as if hinting that the landowner is a collective image of all landowners in Rus' in the 19th century. And Senka and the rest of the men are typical representatives of the peasant class. The theme of the work is simple: the superiority of the hardworking and patient people over the mediocre and stupid nobles, expressed in an allegorical manner.

Problems, features and meaning of the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner”

Saltykov-Shchedrin’s fairy tales are always distinguished by simplicity, irony and artistic details, using which the author can absolutely accurately convey the character of the character “And there was that stupid landowner, he read the newspaper “Vest” and his body was soft, white and crumbly”, “he lived and looked at the light rejoiced."

The main problem in the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” is the problem of the difficult fate of the people. The landowner in the work appears as a cruel and ruthless tyrant who intends to take away the last thing from his peasants. But having heard the prayers of the peasants for a better life and the desire of the landowner to get rid of them forever, God makes their prayers come true. They stop bothering the landowner, and the “men” get rid of oppression. The author shows that in the world of the landowner, the peasants were the creators of all goods. When they disappeared, he himself turned into an animal, grew overgrown, and stopped eating normal food, since all the food disappeared from the market. With the disappearance of the men, a bright, rich life went away, the world became uninteresting, dull, tasteless. Even the entertainment that previously brought pleasure to the landowner - playing pulque or watching a play in the theater - no longer seemed so tempting. The world is empty without the peasantry. Thus, in the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” the meaning is quite real: the upper strata of society oppress and trample the lower ones, but at the same time cannot remain at their illusory heights without them, since it is the “slaves” who provide for the country, but their master is nothing but problems, we are unable to provide.

The image of the people in the works of Saltykov-Shchedrin

The people in the work of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin are hardworking people in whose hands any business “argues.” It was thanks to them that the landowner always lived in abundance. The people appear before us not just as a weak-willed and reckless mass, but as smart and insightful people: “The men see: although their landowner is stupid, he has been given a great mind.” Peasants are also endowed with such an important quality as a sense of justice. They refused to live under the yoke of a landowner who imposed unfair and sometimes insane restrictions on them, and asked God for help.

The author himself treats the people with respect. This can be seen in the contrast between how the landowner lived after the disappearance of the peasantry and during his return: “And suddenly again there was a smell of chaff and sheepskins in that district; but at the same time, flour, meat, and all kinds of livestock appeared at the market, and so many taxes arrived in one day that the treasurer, seeing such a pile of money, just clasped his hands in surprise...”, it can be argued that the people are the driving force of society, the foundation on which the existence of such “landowners” is based, and they certainly owe their well-being to the simple Russian peasant. This is the meaning of the ending of the fairy tale “The Wild Landowner”.

They walked with open heads and long forelocks; they had beards
released. They walked not fearfully, not gloomily, but with a kind of quiet pride;
their dresses of expensive cloth were worn out and hung shabby on them
shreds; they did not look or bow to the people. Ostap walked ahead of everyone.
What did old Taras feel when he saw his Ostap? What happened
then in his heart? He looked at him from the crowd and did not say a single
his movements. They were already approaching the frontal area. Ostap stopped. To him
the first one had to drink this heavy cup. He looked at his people, raised his hand
up and said loudly:
- God forbid that all the heretics standing here don’t hear,
wicked, how a Christian suffers! so that not one of us says anything
one word!
After this he approached the scaffold.
- Good, son, good! - Bulba said quietly and pointed at the ground
gray head.
The executioner tore off his old rags; his hands and feet were tied in on purpose
made machines, and... Let us not confuse readers with a picture of hellish torment, from
whose hair would stand on end. They were the product of the then
rough, ferocious century, when man still led a bloody life of military
exploits and hardened his soul in it, not sensing humanity. In vain some
few who were exceptions from the century were opponents of these terrible
measures In vain the king and many knights, enlightened in mind and soul,
imagined that such cruelty of punishment could only fuel revenge
Cossack nation. But the power of the king and smart opinions was nothing before the disorder
and the daring will of state magnates, who, with their rashness,
an incomprehensible lack of any foresight, childish pride and
with insignificant pride they turned the Sejm into a satire on the government. Ostap carried out
torment and torture like a giant. Neither a scream nor a groan was heard even then,
when they began to break the bones in his arms and legs, when their terrible carnage
was heard among the dead crowd by distant spectators when the panicked
turned away their eyes - nothing resembling a groan escaped from his lips, not
his face trembled. Taras stood in the crowd with his head down and at the same time
proudly raising his eyes and only saying approvingly: “Good, son, good!”
But when they brought him to his last mortal pangs, it seemed as if
his strength began to give way. And he turned his eyes around him: God, everything
unknown, all strangers faces! At least someone close to you would be present
his death! He would not like to hear the sobs and contrition of a weak mother or
the mad cries of his wife, tearing out her hair and beating her white breasts;
Now he would like to see a firm husband who would refresh him with a reasonable word
and consoled him at his death. And he fell with strength and exclaimed in spiritual weakness:
- Father! where are you! Can you hear?
- I hear! - rang out amid the general silence, and all the million people in
I shuddered for a while.
Some of the military horsemen rushed to carefully examine the crowds of people.
Yankel turned pale as death, and when the riders moved a little away from him, he
turned back with fear to look at Taras; but Taras is already near
he was not there: there was no trace of him.

The theme and idea of ​​the work "The Wild Landowner"? and got the best answer

Answer from Liudmila Sharukhia[guru]

Saltykov-Shchedrin. Saltykov-Shchedrin in his fairy tale “The Wild Landowner” talks about a despotic and stupid landowner who hated the peasants and wanted to get rid of them by any means: “The cattle come out to water and the landowner shouts: my water!
the landowner wanders around the outskirts and shouts: my land! And earth, and water, and air - everything
it became! ".In this tale, Saltykov-Shchedrin reflects on the limitless
the power of the landowners, who bully the peasants in every possible way, imagining
almost like gods. The writer also talks about landowner stupidity and
lack of education: “that landowner was stupid, he read the newspaper “Vest” and had a body
soft, white and crumbly."
The powerless situation of the peasantry in tsarist Russia Shchedrin also illustrates in this
fairy tale: “The man could not light the splinter in the light, the twig was no more than the hut
sweep."


nightmares.
After all the peasants abandoned him, the landowner never even washed himself: “Yes, I’ve been unwashed for so many days!” The writer caustically ridicules all this negligence
master class. The life of a landowner without a peasant is far from reminiscent of
normal human life. The master became so wild that "from head to toe
overgrown with hair, his nails became like iron, he even lost the ability
pronounce articulate sounds. But no tail yet
I bought".
Life without peasants was disrupted even in the district itself: “nobody paid taxes
contributes, no one drinks wine in taverns." "Normal" life begins in the district
only when the men return to it. In the image of this one
the landowner Saltykov-Shchedrin showed the life of all gentlemen in Russia. AND
the final words of the tale are addressed to each landowner: “Lays out
Grand Patience, yearns for his former life in the forests, washes himself only with
under duress and at times grunts. "
This tale is full of folk motifs and is close to Russian folklore. There are no tricks in it
words, but there are simple Russian words: “once said and done”, “peasant trousers” and
etc. Saltykov-Shchedrin sympathizes with the people. He believes that torment
the peasants are not endless, and freedom will triumph.

Answer from Noli Meli[newbie]
briefly serfdom

Answer from Alena Blokhina[newbie]
2. The main idea of ​​the fairy tale was that the landowner without the peasant
cannot and does not know how to live, and the landowner dreamed of work only in
nightmares.
1.The theme of serfdom and the life of the peasantry played an important role in creativity
And this is short

Answer from 3 answers[guru]

Hello! Here is a selection of topics with answers to your question: The theme and idea of ​​the work “The Wild Landowner”?