Who came to Oblomov in the first chapter. Know the main issues of the work

Characteristics plan:

1. How Oblomov met the visitor

2. Did Oblomov get up from the sofa to meet him?

3. What thoughts did Oblomov give after the visitor left?

4. Why does the visitor come to Oblomov?

1) Volkov:

1. As soon as the doorbell rang, Oblomov was overcome with curiosity and began to look. Seeing that his guest was Volkov, he greeted him and, as soon as he wanted to approach, he said: “Don’t come, don’t come: you’re coming from the cold!”

There was no attempt to get out of bed.

3. Oblomov began to be surprised: “Ten places in one day - unfortunate!” But I also thought it would be nice to fall in love with some girl too. But in the end he came to the conclusion that his life was much better and calmer and that it suited him.

4. Volkov came to see Oblomov and tell him the latest news, as well as show off his new things.

2) Sudbinsky:

1. Oblomov was delighted at the arrival of his old colleague, greeted him cheerfully, but also said, like Volkov: “Don’t come, don’t come! You’re out of the cold.”

2. Upon Sudbinsky’s arrival, Oblomov did not even move, but there was one moment during the conversation when he jumped out of bed.

3. Oblomov reasoned: “I’m stuck, dear friend, up to my ears. And blind, and deaf, and dumb for everything else in the world. We also call this a career!” Ilya Ilyich also touches on the theme of the essence of man, that with a life like his comrade’s, “there’s not much need for a person here.” After all the reflections, Oblomov settled on the fact that he was glad that he could sit at home all day and not bother with work, unlike Sudbinsky, whom he calls unhappy.

4. Sudbinsky came to visit a former colleague and mentioned that “I’ve been going to see you for a long time.” He spoke about his official affairs and immediate plans, and also tried to invite Oblomov with him to Ekateringof.

3) Penkin:

1. Before Penkin arrived, Oblomov was still in thought after Sudbinsky left, and it turned out that at first he did not even notice the new guest. But after he said hello, he woke up, and the words were heard again: “don’t come, don’t come: you’re coming from the cold!”

2. Oblomov did not particularly react to Penkin’s arrival, but during the conversations Penkin was able to stir up Ilya Ilyich a little, he first stood up, and then completely jumped out of bed. But then I lay down again.

3. When Penkin left, Oblomov began to wonder how he could write all the time, especially at night. He also thought: “Yes, write everything, waste your thought, your soul on trifles, change beliefs, trade your mind and imagination, rape your nature, worry, seethe, burn, know no peace and keep moving somewhere... ". He did not understand this, although earlier he himself reasoned that a person is not a person if he does not live, does not feel, does not use his mind and imagination. He compares Penkin to a machine: “write everything, like a wheel, like a machine: write tomorrow, the day after tomorrow. When will you stop and rest? Unhappy.”

4. Penkin had the purpose of his visit: “Do you know why I came to you? I wanted to invite you to Ekateringof; I have a stroller.” But before he said this, he managed to start a conversation with Oblomov about his new article, then about literature, and then about “fallen people” and about society in general, which was able to excite Oblomov.

4) Alekseev:

1. After the next doorbell rang, Oblomov asked himself the question: “What kind of party am I having today?” After Alekseev came in, he greeted him and immediately warned: “Don’t come, don’t come: I won’t give you my hand: you’re out of the cold!”

2. During the conversation, Oblomov almost did not move from his place, although he was begged to get up, wash himself and start getting ready.

3. Aleksev did not leave Oblomov’s apartment until Tarantiev arrived, and left after him. Oblomov, at the moment of Alekseev’s departure, did not listen to him and, sitting in a chair, “sank either into a doze or into thoughtfulness.”

4. Alekseev came for Oblomov to take him to Ovchinin for lunch, and then with him, Ovchinin, Alyanov, Phaylo and Kolymyagin to go to Ekateringof. He tried to force Oblomov to get up and start getting ready, but Ilya Ilyich dissuaded him from going to lunch with Ovchinin, and having lunch with him and Tarantiev. Oblomov was finally able to talk about his two misfortunes, and Alekseev listened to him.

5) Tarantiev:

1. As soon as Tarantiev arrived, he greeted Oblomov and extended his hand, but Ilya Ilyich, like all previous visitors, said: “Don’t come, don’t come: you’re from the cold!”, and covered himself with a blanket.

2. Oblomov met the guest lying on the bed, but Tarantiev tried to lift him out of bed, “but he warned him by quickly lowering his feet and immediately hitting both shoes with them.” Tarantiev began to call Zakhar to dress the master. Oblomov, with the help of Zakhar, got up and sat down in a chair.

3. After Tarantyev left, Oblomov began to think about his problems: “Oblomov was upset by both the headman’s letter and the upcoming move to an apartment and was partly tired of Tarantyev’s chatter.”

4. Tarantiev was invited to dinner by Oblomov. And since the invitee arrived early, Ilya Ilyich decided to consult with him about his misfortunes. Tarantiev decided to cash in on the help, which he succeeded in doing. He also came to ask Oblomov to lend him his black tailcoat for a while, but Zakhar, who insisted on his own, did not give the tailcoat to Tarantiev.

The novel “Oblomov” is a classic, in which interest either subsides or, on the contrary, flares up with enormous force. The point is in the character of Ilya Ilyich, who becomes a symbol of some eras, and a negative hero of others.

Oblomov's guests and the purpose of their arrival will help to understand the character of a complex character.

Oblomov's guests

Throughout the novel, few guests come to Oblomov. They are all different in nature, appearance and age. Alekseev and Tarantiev come to Ilya Ilyich more often and more diligently. At first glance, these are two opposite characters: noisy and quiet, rude and timid, arrogant and meek. But in fact, they have a lot in common: the inability to build a career, the desire to eat at the expense of others.

The rest of the guests were infrequent visitors to Ilya. They were brought to him by chance circumstances. They flew in for a minute and, seeing no point in communicating, quickly left the uncomfortable house. Such guests understood that they could not reciprocate the host, reported some not very important news and left. Friends were an irritation in Oblomov’s life. They tried to return him to a stormy and ebullient life, but their views did not coincide. Oblomov began to dislike them more and more. He pushed them away, not wanting even absurd friendly contact. They smelled of cold from the street, and it was cold not only in the literal sense of the word, but also figuratively.

Volkov

The cheerful young man is carefree and cheerful. He shares the latest news with Ilya, boasts of new things. The guest is a fashionista who loves to show off clothes from the latest collections. He has a beautiful hairstyle. Volkov's life is a stormy celebration. He manages to visit 10 different places in one day:

“Ten places in one day - unfortunate!”

Volkov is trying to change Oblomov’s attitude towards women. Thoughts about falling in love visited the owner and immediately melted away. The busy life did not make Ilya envious. He felt that his balanced and calm lifestyle was better.

Sudbinsky

The guest is Oblomov’s former colleague; they served together in the office. Sudbinsky has a telling surname. He is the builder of his destiny: he makes a career, strives for promotions, receives awards. Sudbinsky came to visit his friend, to invite him to go with him to Ekateringof. The story about his work did not arouse Oblomov’s interest. He is glad that he does not need to get bogged down head over heels in a career “fuss” like a guest. In a conversation between friends, the topic of human essence is raised, which fades into the background, leaving the desire for rank and service on the surface. Good earnings and eternal employment are what Sudbinsky wanted to encourage his colleague to do.

Penkin

The young writer Penkin came to Oblomov with an offer to go to Ekateringof. But before pronouncing the purpose of the visit, the guest spoke about his article, about literature in general. He excited Ilya with thoughts about fallen people and changes in society. Ilya even jumped out of his comfortable bed, but it was a momentary outburst. Writing even at night is too wrong. Selling your thoughts is also absurd. Oblomov compares Penkin to a car that spins without stopping every day. For Ilya Ilyich, life without sleep and rest is synonymous with an unhappy existence.

Alekseev

The purpose of his visit to Oblomov, like his whole life, is to eat. He invites Ilya to lunch with a mutual friend, and after lunch to go with friends to Yekateringof. Oblomov offers to stay and have dinner with him. Alekseev is a timid person, afraid of himself. He does not advance in his career, does not have his own opinion, adapts to others, gradually losing face. It becomes unremarkable externally and internally. But only to this quiet guest Oblomov was able to voice his problems.

Tarantiev

Countryman and friend of Ilya Ilyich Tarantiev is a noisy and rude guest. Without asking consent, he tries to lift Oblomov from the bed. At Tarantiev's request, Zakhar's servant dresses the master. Oblomov sits down in a chair. Tarantiev was an invited guest, he was invited to dinner, but another purpose of the visit was to beg for a black tailcoat. Only the servant prevented the guest's impudence. Tarantiev constantly scolds, grumbles and swears. He is dissatisfied with everything in the world, looking for profit, an opportunity to deceive and cheat.

Doctor

The purpose of visiting the doctor is Oblomov’s health. He warns Ilya about the possibility of a stroke and the need to change his lifestyle, but he does not listen to his advice. The doctor is elegant and attractive. He enters the homes of rich patients, so he is reserved and calm. The doctor has a good income, his behavior is of interest.

Target: show the role of minor characters in the work of I.A. Goncharov “Oblomov” in identifying the author’s position.

Tasks:

Educational:

To form an idea of ​​a harmonious personality as a guideline for the self-education of each person;

Show the complexity and ambiguity of the character of the main character of the novel I.A. Goncharov through his comparison with the images of other characters in the work;

Identify the uniqueness of the means of creating images of heroes in a work of art.

Educational:

Develop logical thinking and the ability to defend your position;

To form a personality capable of creative activity;

Develop group work skills.

Educators:

To cultivate love and respect for the Russian language and Russian classical literature;

To promote a culture of communication and the need for self-education;

To promote the development of moral qualities of students, paying attention to the development of an active life position.

Lesson type: lesson of learning new knowledge.

Form of work: frontal work of the teacher with the class, group work, individual work, role-playing game.

Educational technologies: theatrical technology, activity-type technologies (technology for the development of critical thinking, problem-solving dialogue technology), gaming technology, technology of student-centered learning.

Equipment: projector, Power Point presentations “On a visit to Ilya Oblomov” “Physical exercise for the eyes”, video clips from the feature film “A few days in the life of Oblomov”, audio recording “Oblomov’s Thoughts”, handouts, decorations for the lesson illustrating the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov’s room.

Download:

Preview:

Class: 10

Lesson #3.

Date of:

Subject: The heroes of the novel by I.A. Goncharov “Oblomov” in their relation to Oblomov.

Target: show the role of minor characters in the work of I.A. Goncharov “Oblomov” in identifying the author’s position.

Tasks:

Educational:

To form an idea of ​​a harmonious personality as a guideline for the self-education of each person;

Show the complexity and ambiguity of the character of the main character of the novel I.A. Goncharov through his comparison with the images of other characters in the work;

Identify the uniqueness of the means of creating images of heroes in a work of art.

Educational:

Develop logical thinking and the ability to defend your position;

- to form a personality capable of creative activity;

Develop group work skills.

Educators:

To cultivate love and respect for the Russian language and Russian classical literature;

- promote a culture of communication and the need for self-education;

To promote the development of moral qualities of students, paying attention to the development of an active life position.

Lesson type: lesson of learning new knowledge.

Form of work: frontal work of the teacher with the class, group work, individual work, role-playing game.

Educational technologies:theatrical technology, activity-type technologies (technology for the development of critical thinking, problem-solving dialogue technology), gaming technology, technology of student-centered learning.

Equipment: projector, Power Point presentations “On a visit to Ilya Oblomov” “Physical exercise for the eyes”, video clips from the feature film “A few days in the life of Oblomov”, audio recording “Oblomov’s Thoughts”, handouts, decorations for the lesson illustrating the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov’s room.

During the classes:

1. Organizing time. Motivational attitude.

Good afternoon guys. Today we continue our acquaintance with Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”, we continue to analyze the text and comprehend the secrets of the author’s artistic skill.

As you know, this novel is a classic of world literature.Roman Goncharova " Oblomov "is prominent in Russian and world literature a milestone on humanity's path to solving many problems.Do you think it is important to read classical literature? (Yes)

Let's play the game "Speaker". Take on the role of a speaker and prove that reading classical literature is necessary.

(Children's answers:

- A classic has become a classic because it contains something that even after a long time retains its relevance.

- Classic books are eternal, as they help to reveal many aspects of human life and relationships that do not depend on time.

- Reading classic literatureinfluences the reader's inner world. Even if the book is a hundred years old or more. She is the only one who can tell about interesting events, convey all the shades of the characters’ experiences, their thoughts, accurately describe actions and their reasons. Some works can play a big role in the life of the public.

Another reason that can become a significant argument in favorreading classical literature- this is what these works are part of the intellectual and cultural heritage of humanity, losing which would be simply a crime. Those joys, successes, defeats that our ancestors left us in the classics should not become unnecessary.)

Well done! With this attitude, we can safely continue our journey through the pages of I.A.’s novel. Goncharov "Oblomov".

2 . Checking homework.

At home, you were asked to fill out a questionnaire about insignificant, seemingly unnoticeable characters in the novel, who can still influence the formation of the idea of ​​the main character. I hope that while reading the novel, these characters helped you to reveal the image of Oblomov to a greater extent.

Guys, tell me, what characters’ names did you put in this profile?

(Volkov, Sudbinsky, Penkin, Alekseev, Tarantiev, Mukhoyarov, Olga’s aunt, Zakhar).

(See Appendix 1).

3. Updating experience. Goal setting.

In the previous lesson, we studied the central image of the novel - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. Let's briefly draw up his portrait. (Notes in notebooks).

Based on the completed table, answer the question: what do these characters have in common and what distinguishes them from each other?

(The first five characters - Oblomov’s “guests”, Olga’s aunt and Mukhoyarov - are not directly related to Oblomov, they play a direct role. Zakhar is a servant, but has similarities with Oblomov. They have one thing in common - they are all minor characters, but they are all concentrated around the main character, some of them even contribute to the creation of the image of the main character).

Important!! When using the “joint search” technique, the teacher takes into account the opinion of each student who speaks.

What features of the characters can be defined as contrasting? Why does the author need this contrast?

(All the features that are opposed to the main character. To contrast each with Oblomov, in order to formulate an idea of ​​the image more clearly and vividly).

Do you think one character can somehow influence the reader's understanding of the main character? How does this manifest itself?

What do you think our lesson today will be devoted to, if we have already touched on the image of the central character? (Formulate the topic of the lesson approximately “Minor characters in the novel “Oblomov”).

How do you understand the meaning of the word “minor”?

(Secondary, -th, -oe. Not main, not basic, less significant (second degree in importance).

What is the purpose of our lesson? (Evaluate the role of minor characters in the novel)

4. Learning new knowledge.

Guys, today's lesson can be called unusual. If we came up with a name for each lesson, then today’s title would be as follows: “On a visit to Ilya Oblomov.” Let's imagine that we are in the artistic world created by Goncharov on the pages of the novel.

Frontal survey."Reference point".

1) What era are we in? (19th century)

2) What city are we in? (St. Petersburg)

3) To what social circle does the hero belong? (Nobility // master who has estate, land, peasants)

4) Where could you meet people of this circle? (At a service, in a theater, at a ball or reception, in a park, on the Neva embankment).

5) Where are we going? Where should we look for a hero? (Gorokhovaya street, rented apartment).

6) Why is the hero at home now? (Oblomov is always at home).

Since our hero doesn’t go out anywhere, we’ll have to go visit Oblomov ourselves.

Only today will one half of the class have the opportunity to plunge into the atmosphere of Oblomov’s life and witness Oblomov’s communication with his guests, and the other half of the class will have a wonderful opportunity to express themselves creatively and show themselves a small excerpt from the novel, to be Oblomov’s guests. So, we plunge into an atmosphere of eternal peace and sleep and look into the house of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. And at the same time we’ll get to know the guests themselves.

Using the theatrical technique (Appendix 2).

After the performance:

Call phase: Assessment questions:

How did you feel while watching the dramatization of the text?

What questions arose when comparing the text and living characters?

Did the actors succeed in conveying the characters they represented?

Were you able to trace the complexity of the main character's character?

5. Physical exercise.

6. Stage of checking understanding of what has been learned.

1. Group work. The “double diary” technique.Distribution of the class into two groups. The teacher asks one group to fill out the table column “what positive things did the guests bring to Oblomov” (+), the second group – “what negative things” (-). The result is the following:

1. Individual work(written, abstract):

Who is Zakhar? What are the features of this character? What is his role?

(done by the strong student while the rest work orally)

1. Frontal work.

a) Blitz survey:

How many guests came to Oblomov? (5).

What are their names (Volkov, Sudbinsky, Penkin, Alekseev, Tarantiev).

Where did some guests call Oblomov? (To Ekateringof, for entertainment, to celebrate May 1).

What phrase did Oblomov repeatedly repeat when meeting guests? (“Get out of the cold…”).

What issue was Oblomov trying to solve by asking his visitors for help? (Housing problem).

b) Educational brainstorming.

Is Oblomov's image as simple as it seems at first glance? (The image, like the novel, is ambiguous).

What is the reason for this certain complexity of the image of the main character? (Due to the projection of images of secondary characters onto the main image. We can trace his actions, speech, behavior in general).

What character qualities do you think Oblomov lacks for an ideal hero? (Self-confidence, panache, mischief, optimism, active life position in general).

Can these qualities be adopted from his acquaintances and friends? (Perhaps, he lacks all this).

And what traits of Oblomov’s guests would not be worth adopting? Why? (Reverence of rank, pretense, farce, spinelessness, impudence, rudeness).

Why can't guests get Oblomov off the couch? (He is above their interests. He is a philosopher.

M. Prishvin: “No “positive” activity in Russia can withstand Oblomov’s criticism: his peace is fraught with a request for the highest value, for such activity, because of which it would be worth losing peace”).

Which literary hero of Russian literature of the first third of the 19th century is reminiscent of those qualities of Oblomov that appeared in the first episodes? (Manilova is a dreamer from the novel “Dead Souls” by N.V. Gogol).

The typological feature of which heroes is lack of fulfillment in business and society? (Type of “extra person”).

How does the treatment of the problem of the “extra person” in this novel differ from its treatment in previous literature? (In the works of A.S. Pushkin, A.S. Griboedov, the type of “superfluous person” is an extraordinary, titanic personality. I.A. Goncharov showed how reality destroys not a titan, but an ordinary son of the century, just a good person. Goncharov brought the logic development of the “superfluous person” to its logical conclusion (unrealization, complete inactivity. The conflict “man-environment” is moved inside the hero himself: it prevents the personality of the “landowner” from being realized in the hero himself, in the soul of the hero).

What role does the seemingly inconspicuous character Ivan Matveevich Mukhoyarov play in the novel? (He is the spring in the events connected with Oblomov, he decides the fate of Oblomov’s estate, he is an unpleasant character).

And Olga’s aunt, Marya Mikhailovna? (It’s nothing special. On the other hand, for nowDespite Olga’s romance with Oblomov, Marya Mikhailovna remains true to herself, without betraying her own attitude towards their frequent meetings. Usually, during Ilya Ilyich’s visits, “his aunt... looks at him with her languid big eyes and thoughtfully sniffs her alcohol, as if it gives her a headache.” It is in the behavior of Marya Mikhailovna, from whom he never officially asked for Olga’s hand, that Oblomov finds silent support for the idea of ​​the futility of this decisive step).

Checking the answer to the questions asked about Zakhara. Determining its place in the text.

(Based on Blomov’s irony and life perception, and also based on the key moments we saw in the text, we can say with complete confidence that Zakhar is “an even greater Oblomov than Ilya Ilyich himself.” This is most clearly expressed in the following episode of the text: “Oblomov looked at him reproachfully, shook his head and sighed, and Zakhar looked indifferently at the window and The master sighed too. It seemed he was thinking: “Well, brother, you are even more of an Oblomov than I am...” The image of Zakhara is necessary in the novel, without it the picture of Oblomovism would be incomplete.)

Does the novel pose the problem of a holistic, harmonious personality? How? For what?

(IN All the main characters of the novel are ideal. But they are perfect from different sides. In Oblomov - the ideal of a poet, in Stolz - the ideal of a sober-minded person, in Olga - the ideal of a person aware of his duty. Oblomov is ideal for Pshenitsyna and Oblomovka. And Stolz and Olga are ideal for society. A harmonious personality is not Stolz, not Oblomov, not Olga individually. This is all of them combined. Oblomov is not an absolute ideal. If Goncharov combined the qualities of Stolz and Oblomov, the result would be a perfect image).

With the appearance of which guest, the image of Oblomov seems to us not at all unambiguous? (when Stolz-next topic appears).

7. Stage of consolidation of new material.

A basket is placed on the table in front of the students. In advance, the teacher selects theses on the topic, including erroneous ones, and puts them in the basket. Students take out a piece of paper with a thesis from the basket, agree or refute, and correct it.

1. As they get to know Oblomov's guests, the reader understands that perhaps the main character is right in his attitude towards them. All of them are also Oblomovites, despite the apparent opposite to him. They only create the appearance of activity, while in reality they do nothing.
2. Oblomov’s guests are not accidental. Volkov is a social dandy, a dandy; Sudbinsky is Oblomov’s colleague who has been promoted; Penkin is a successful writer; Alekseev is a faceless man, Tarantyev is assertive, arrogant, boorish. Oblomov could be a social dandy, like Volkov (but women liked him, even very beautiful women, but he alienated them from him), could serve and rise to high ranks , like Sudbinsky, could have become a writer, like Penkin (Stolz, bringing him books to read, got Oblomov addicted to poetry. Oblomov found rapture in poetry...), could have gotten the better of people, allowed assertiveness in his actions, like Tarantyev, and the faceless Alekseev tells us that a choice can still be made.
3. The scene of Oblomov’s meeting with the guests does not represent anything of artistic value.
4. The author treats Oblomov completely differently than the other characters in the novel - guests of Oblomov's estate. Volkov, Sudbinsky, Alekseev, Penkin, Tarantiev - all these cheap gentlemen are bright representatives of the local secular society, “with ranks and titles.” Their traditional visit is simply alien to the understanding of the protagonist. He is beyond their understanding of the world. He's more humane.
5. Zakhar is “even more Oblomov than Oblomov himself.”
6. The life and fate of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov cannot make one think about the most complex issues of free will and the need to live “as needed” or “as I want.”

8. The stage of informing students about homework, instructions on how to complete it.

1. Consider the pair “Stolz and Oblomov”. Answer the question in writing: “Oblomov and Stolz: twins or antipodes?”
2. Love in a novel. Oblomov’s development of relationships with women. Fill in the table (handout) with the necessary quotes.
3. What is “Oblomovism”? Summarize what was said earlier. Create a cluster “Traits of Oblomovism.”
4. For everyone: get acquainted with excerpts from critical articles by N.A. Dobrolyubov. “What is Oblomovism?” Druzhinina A.V. “Oblomov”, Pisareva D.I. “Oblomov. Roman Goncharova I.A.” (synopsis in notebook).

9. Summing up the lesson.

The guys in a circle speak in one sentence, choosing the beginning of a phrase from the reflexive screen on the board:

Today I found out...

It was interesting…

It was difficult…

I completed tasks...

I realized that...

Now I can…

I felt that...

I purchased...

I learned…

I managed …

I was able...

I will try…

I was surprised...

Gave me a lesson for life...

I wanted…

Grading by the teacher.

Today in class we looked at the role of minor characters in the novel. We have proven that one of the means of creating an image is to compare the character traits of several minor characters with the main one in order to more clearly trace the development of the image in the novel. In the next lessons we will continue our conversation about a work of art, make sure of its specificity, and reveal new manifestations of the skill of the author - Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov in his controversial novel “Oblomov”.

The lesson is over! Goodbye!

Appendix 1. Unsung characters of the novel.

A questionnaire to fill out (the form was distributed at home).

Appendix 2.

Using theater technology in the classroom. A re-enactment of the scene of the reception of guests in Oblomov's house.

Oblomov, Volkov, Sudbinsky, Penkin, Alekseev, Tarantiev, Author.

The ticking of a clock is heard. On the screen are stills from the film “A Few Days in the Life of Oblomov” (The hero lies turned to the wall). The student playing the role of Oblomov lies on a pre-prepared sleeping place in the middle of the class.

Call. Volkov comes in.

A young man of about twenty-five entered, radiant in health, with laughing cheeks, lips and eyes. Envy took in looking at him.

Ah, Volkov, hello! - said Ilya Ilyich.

“Hello, Oblomov,” said the brilliant gentleman, approaching him.

Don't come, don't come: you're coming from the cold! - he said.

You haven't gotten up yet! What kind of dressing gown are you wearing? They stopped wearing these a long time ago,” he shamed Oblomov.

“This is not a dressing gown, but a robe,” said Oblomov, lovingly wrapping himself in the wide flaps of the robe.

Where are you from so early? - asked Oblomov.

From the tailor. Look, is the tailcoat good? - he said, tossing and turning in front of Oblomov.

Great! Made with great taste,” said Ilya Ilyich.

Oblomov, do you know, I’m... in love with Lydia,” Volkov whispered.

Bravo! How long ago? She seems so cute.

That's three weeks! - Volkov said with a deep sigh. - What dust you have everywhere! - he said.

All Zakhar! - Oblomov complained.

Well, I have to go! - said Volkov.

Come and have tea in the evening, from the ballet: tell us what happened there,” Oblomov invited.

I can’t, I gave my word to the Mussinskys: their day is today. Let's go too. Would you like me to introduce you?

No, what to do there?

You won't be pleased. There aren't enough houses! Now everyone has days: the Savinovs have lunch on Thursdays, the Maklashins have Fridays, the Vyaznikovs have Sundays, and Prince Tyumenev has Wednesdays. My days are busy! - Volkov concluded with shining eyes.

And aren’t you too lazy to hang around every day?

Here, laziness! What kind of laziness? Have fun! - he said carelessly. - Goodbye. I still have ten places to go. And he disappeared.

Oblomov's thoughts (recorded in advance, audio recording included):

“Ten places in one day - unfortunate! And this is life! Where is the man here? What does it crush and crumble into? Of course, it wouldn’t be a bad idea to pop into the theater and fall in love with some Lydia... she’s cute! In the village, picking flowers and riding with her is good; Yes, ten places in one day - unfortunate!

Doorbell. Sudbinsky enters.

A new guest entered.

Hello, Sudbinsky! - Oblomov greeted cheerfully. - I forcibly looked into an old colleague! Don't come, don't come! You're out of the cold.

Hello, Ilya Ilyich. “I’ve been planning to come to you for a long time,” said the guest, “but you know what a devilish service we have!” Look, I’m taking a whole suitcase to the report; and now, if they ask anything there, he told the courier to gallop here. You can’t have yourself for a minute.

Are you still on duty? So late? - asked Oblomov. - Sometimes you started at ten o'clock...

What to do! You have to work if you take money. I’ll rest in the summer: Foma Fomich promises to invent a business trip specifically for me... here, here I’ll get runs for five horses, daily allowance of three rubles a day, and then a reward...

They're hurting! - Oblomov said with envy; then he sighed and thought.

I need money: I’m getting married in the fall,” added Sudbinsky.

What you! Indeed? On whom? - Oblomov said with participation.

Not kidding, on Murashina. Do you remember how they lived near me in the dacha? You drank tea with me and, it seems, saw her.

No, I do not remember! Pretty? - asked Oblomov.

Yes, honey. If you want, we'll go and have dinner with them...

Oblomov hesitated.

Yes... okay, just...

“That week,” Sudbinsky said.

Yes, yes, last week,” Oblomov was delighted, “my dress is not ready yet.” Well, is it a good game?

Yes, my father is an active state councilor; He gives ten thousand, the apartment is government-owned. He gave us a whole half, twelve rooms; The furniture is official, heating, lighting too: you can live...

Yes, you can! Still would! What is Sudbinsky like! - Oblomov added, not without envy.

I invite you to the wedding, Ilya Ilyich, as best man: look...

Of course! - said Oblomov.

“Goodbye,” said the official, “I’ve been chatting, I’ll need something there...

Oblomov's thoughts:

“I'm stuck, dear friend, I'm stuck up to my ears. And blind, and deaf, and dumb to everything else in the world. And he will become a public figure, eventually manage his affairs and acquire ranks... In our country this is also called a career! And how little of a person is needed here: his mind, will, feelings - why is this? Luxury! And he will live out his life, and many, many things will not move in him... And meanwhile he works from twelve to five in the office, from eight to twelve at home - unhappy!

Penkin enters.

Hello, Penkin; don't come, don't come: you're out of the cold! - said Oblomov.

Oh, you weirdo! - he said. - Still the same incorrigible, carefree sloth!

Yes, carefree! - said Oblomov. - Now I’ll show you a letter from the headman: you’re racking your brains, racking your brains, and you say: carefree! Where are you from?

From the bookstore: I went to see if the magazines were out. Have you read my article?

No.

I am pursuing this thought and I know that it is new and bold. One traveler witnessed these beatings and, during a meeting with the governor, complained to him. He ordered the official who was going there for the investigation to casually verify this and generally collect information about the personality and behavior of the mayor. The official called the townspeople together to ask about trade, but in the meantime, let’s investigate about this too. What about the bourgeoisie? They bow and laugh and praise the mayor. The official began to find out from the side, and he was told that the townspeople are terrible swindlers, they sell rot, they weigh, they even measure the treasury, they are all immoral, so these beatings are righteous punishment...

I should write to you, Ilya Ilyich, you have a lot of tact!

Oblomov waves it off.

Yes, you can read it for yourself.

What didn't I see there? - said Oblomov. - Why do they write this: they’re just to amuse themselves...

Depict a thief, a fallen woman, a pompous fool, and don’t forget the man. Where is the humanity? You want to write with one head! - Oblomov almost hissed. - Do you think that thoughts don’t require a heart? No, she is fertilized by love. Extend your hand to a fallen person to lift him up, or weep bitterly over him if he dies, and do not mock him. Love him, remember yourself in him and treat him as you would treat yourself, then I will begin to read you and bow my head before you...” he said, lying down again calmly on the sofa. “They portray a thief, a fallen woman,” he said, “but they forget the person or do not know how to portray him.” What kind of art is there, what poetic colors have you found? Denounce debauchery and filth, but please, without pretending to be poetry.

So, would you like to depict nature: roses, a nightingale, or a frosty morning, while everything is boiling and moving around? We need one bare physiology of society; We have no time for songs now...

Give me a man, a man! - said Oblomov. - Love him...

However, it’s time for me to go to the printing house! - said Penkin. Write at night and send light to the printing house. Farewell.

Oblomov's thoughts:
“Write at night, when do you sleep? And hey, he’ll earn five thousand a year! This is bread! Yes, write everything, waste your thought, your soul on trifles, change beliefs, trade your mind and imagination, rape your nature, worry, seethe, burn, know no peace and keep moving somewhere... And write everything, write everything , like a wheel, like a car: write tomorrow, the day after tomorrow; the holiday will come, summer will come - and he writes everything? When should you stop and rest? Unhappy!"

Call. Alekseev enters.

A man of uncertain years entered, with an uncertain physiognomy, at a time when it is difficult to guess the age; neither handsome nor ugly, neither tall nor short, neither blond nor dark-haired. Nature did not give him any sharp, noticeable feature, neither bad nor good. Many called him Ivan Ivanovich, others - Ivan Vasilich, others - Ivan Mikhailych.

A! - Oblomov met him. - Is it you, Alekseev? Hello. Where? Don't come, don't come: I won't give you my hand: you're out of the cold!

What are you talking about, how cold! “I wasn’t thinking of coming to you today,” said Alekseev, “but Ovchinin met me and took me to my place.” I'm behind you, Ilya Ilyich.

Where is this going?

Yes, let’s go to Ovchinin. There are Matvey Andreich Alyanov, Kazimir Albertych Phaylo, Vasily Sevastyanich Kolymyagin.

Why are they gathered there and what do they need from me?

Ovchinin invites you to dinner.

Hm! Dinner... - Oblomov repeated monotonously.

And then everyone goes to Ekateringof: they told them to tell you to hire a stroller.

I have two misfortunes! I don’t know what to do.

Which ones?

They are driving me out of the apartment; Imagine - we have to move out: withdrawals, fuss... it’s scary to think about! After all, I lived in an apartment for eight years.

Well, what would you do if you were me? - Oblomov asked, looking questioningly at Alekseev, with sweet hope that maybe he would come up with something to calm him down.

We have to think, Ilya Ilyich, we can’t suddenly decide,” said Alekseev.

Enter Tarantiev

“Hello, fellow countryman,” Tarantyev said abruptly, extending his shaggy hand to Oblomov. - Why are you still lying there like a log?

Don't come, don't come: you're coming from the cold! - said Oblomov, covering himself with a blanket.

Here's another thing I came up with - out of the cold! - Tarantiev shouted. - Well, well, take your hand if they give it to you! It's almost twelve o'clock, and he's lying around!

Have you heard about my misfortunes? They are driving me out of the apartment, the headman sent a letter.

Here's what: tomorrow, please, move to an apartment... on the Vyborg side.

I won't move. (Arguing)

Well, to hell with you! - answered Tarantyev, going to the door. - Look, Ilya Ilyich, I’ll rent you an apartment - do you hear? - he added.

I’ll go and tell them not to wait for us at Ekateringof. “Goodbye, Ilya Ilyich,” said Alekseev.

They leave.

Appendix 3.

Compiling a quotation table (homework 2nd row)

hero Oblomov Stolz

I.A. was not spared. Goncharov and guests of Ilya Ilyich. Each of them has their own portrait, although not very complete. Thanks to this, the reader creates an image of those people with whom the main character communicated. Let's get to know some of them.

Volkov comes first: “...a young man of about twenty-five, shining in health, with laughing cheeks, lips and eyes. Envy took me to look at him.” Goncharov, I.A. Oblomov. A novel in 4 parts. - M.: Fiction, 1984. - 493 p. - P. 32 He dazzled with the freshness of his face, his linen, and his tailcoat. He had a shiny hat and patent leather boots. And as Oblomov himself correctly called him, “a brilliant gentleman.”

Sudbinsky appears in a different image to the reader. This is “a gentleman in a dark green tailcoat with coat of arms buttons, clean-shaven... with a weary, but calmly conscious expression in his eyes, with a heavily worn face, with a thoughtful smile.” Right there. - P. 36 These features are not accidental, because this guest is the head of the department.

Another guest, Alekseev, was a man “... of uncertain years, with an uncertain physiognomy... neither handsome nor ugly, neither tall nor short, neither blond nor dark-haired...”. Right there. - P. 44 As the writer notes, nature did not give this character any noticeable features.

The portrait of Mikhei Andreevich Tarantiev is given more fully. This is “a man of about forty...tall, bulky in the shoulders and throughout the body, with large facial features, a large head...short neck, with large protruding eyes, thick lips.” Right there. - P. 52 He did not pursue the elegance of his suit, he was not always shaved... But all this, it seems, did not bother the hero himself. Tarantiev is unkind to everything around him, scolds everything and everyone. He has been working in the office for twenty-five years. Sometimes he is like a child: he overlooks something, misses something.

It is this description of Oblomov’s guests that is especially detailed, since I.A. Goncharov brings this hero closer to Oblomov. The point is not even that they have one small homeland, but also that both Tarantyev and Oblomov were left with their unrealistic hopes, although somewhere inside they were full of dormant forces.

I.A. Goncharov puts portraits of the above characters at the very beginning of the chapter, which allows the reader to immediately imagine the image of Oblomov’s guest, and then follow the conversation of the characters.

Portrait of Zakhar

Zakhar is the servant of Ilya Ilyich. Despite the fact that he is a simple man of low class, I.A. Goncharov also created his portrait. The servant was over fifty years old, with “immensely wide and thick gray-blond sideburns.” The image is complemented by clothes: a gray frock coat and vest, which the character really liked, but this is all at the beginning of the novel. At the end, a sad portrait is given: “...he had patches on his elbows; he looked so poor and hungry, as if he ate poorly, slept little and was working for three people.” Goncharov, I.A. Oblomov. A novel in 4 parts. - M.: Fiction, 1984. - 493 pp. - P. 427 This is how Zakhar changed while in Pshenitsyna’s house.

It is interesting that I.A. Goncharov complements the portrait with some character traits and habits of the servant. For example, the reader learns that Zakhar is a gossip, ready to scold the master at any opportunity, loves to drink, and sometimes steals from Oblomov.

Zakhar is unpleasant (he rarely shaves). Very awkward, slow, clumsy. Even when he tries to please the master, everything happens completely the opposite. “There is no end to troubles and losses” from such a servant.

Despite all his shortcomings and repulsive properties, Zakhar is passionately devoted to the master; he would die instead of the master if necessary, since he considered it his duty.

- representatives of different classes, busy with their own affairs, but the results of their efforts are not much different from what is happening in the house of Ilya Ilyich. In one day, six visitors appear - quite enough for a “lazy” master. Oblomov himself is just over thirty years old, so his acquaintances extend to a group of young people, including: the fashionable dandy Volkov, former colleague Sudbinsky, the young writer Penkin, the official Alekseev, the bully and swindler Tarantiev and the doctor who recommends Oblomov change his lifestyle.

“Oblomov’s most zealous visitors” Alekseev and Tarantiev show up to have a delicious lunch and spend extra time. The rest stopped by infrequently, and gradually communication was interrupted: “Oblomov was sometimes interested in some news, ... then, satisfied with this, he remained silent. They had to reciprocate, take part in what interested them.” They try to get him out on a visit, invite him to a party in Yekateringof, “he didn’t like all this, it repulsed him.”

His idleness is ensured by his social status and the work of other people, but Ilya Ilyich clearly understands that he is unable to rearrange his life in such a way as to benefit or enjoy social gatherings. The absence of a common cause deprives the relationship of meaning, people have nothing to discuss and nothing to share, so Goncharov’s sympathies clearly lean towards the main character: “It’s better to do nothing at all than to do it somehow.”

All topics have been exhausted, there is nothing interesting in the future, and only the relationship with Andrei Stolts, who also often visits Oblomov, revives Oblomov’s behavior. This image is presented as the opposite of Ilya Ilyich; the author endows him with the idealized features of an enterprising nobleman who received a “labor and practical education” from childhood. On the eve of the abolition of serfdom, Goncharov is trying to determine the driving forces of social development. It is not for nothing that even the beautiful Ilyinskaya joins her destiny with him, because he is muscular, interesting, and Oblomov, with flabby cheeks and apathetic, “has grown a belly and thinks that nature has sent him this burden.”

None of Oblomov’s guests are essentially capable of changing and changing the life around them; the novel presents personal and social characteristics that show that these people are ordinary consumers, capable only of using what others have invented and created. At the dawn of technological progress in the mid-19th century, many writers and famous thinkers believed that accessible education and industrial advances would change the human race.

This misconception was later refuted: in our time, the consumer class is constantly expanding, and the number of people in production and agriculture is falling. Therefore, Goncharov’s critical attitude towards Oblomov’s guests is not entirely justified; their “senseless” behavior allows people like Stolz to demonstrate their successes and achieve recognition in the crowd of “unfortunate” and worthless people.