The image of the landowner Korobochka in the poem by N.V. Gogol "Dead Souls". Russian nobility landowner in the literature of the first half of the 19th century List of used literature

Introduction

§1. The principle of constructing images of landowners in the poem

§2. Image of the Box

§3. Artistic detail as a means

character characteristics

§4. Korobochka and Chichikov.

Conclusion

List of used literature

Introduction

The poem “Dead Souls” was created by N.V. Gogol for about 17 years. Its plot was suggested by A.S. Pushkin. Gogol began working on the poem in the fall of 1835, and on May 21, 1842, “Dead Souls” appeared in print. The publication of Gogol's poem caused fierce controversy: some admired it, others saw in it slander against modern Russia and the “special world of scoundrels.” Gogol worked on the continuation of the poem until the end of his life, writing the second volume (which was later burned) and planning to create a third volume.

According to the writer’s plan, the poem should have depicted not only contemporary Russia with all its problems and shortcomings (serfdom, bureaucratic system, loss of spirituality, illusory nature, etc.), but also the basis on which the country could be reborn in a new social -economic situation. The poem “Dead Souls” was supposed to be an artistic search for a “living soul” - the type of person who could become the master of the new Russia.

Gogol based the composition of the poem on the architectonics of Dante’s “Divine Comedy” - the hero’s journey, accompanied by a guide (the poet Virgil), first through the circles of hell, then, through purgatory, through the spheres of heaven. On this journey, the lyrical hero of the poem met the souls of people burdened with sins (in the circles of hell) and marked with grace (in heaven). Dante's poem was a gallery of types of people embodied in artistic images of famous characters from mythology and history. Gogol also wanted to create a large-scale work that would reflect not only the present of Russia, but also its future. “...What a huge, original plot... All of Rus' will appear in it!..” - Gogol wrote to Zhukovsky. But for the writer it was important to depict not the external side of Russian life, but its “soul” - the internal state of human spirituality. Following Dante, he created a gallery of types of people from different segments of the population and classes (landowners, officials, peasants, metropolitan society), in which psychological, class, and spiritual traits were reflected in a generalized form. Each of the characters in the poem is both typical and clearly individualized - with its own characteristics of behavior and speech, attitude to the world and moral values. Gogol's skill was manifested in the fact that his poem “Dead Souls” is not just a gallery of types of people, it is a collection of “souls”, among which the author is looking for a living one, capable of further development.

Gogol was going to write a work consisting of three volumes (in accordance with the architectonics of Dante’s “Divine Comedy”): “hell” of Russia, “purgatory” and “paradise” (future). When the first volume was published, the controversy that flared up around the work, especially negative assessments, shocked the writer, he went abroad and began work on the second volume. But the work was very difficult: Gogol’s views on life, art, and religion changed; he experienced a spiritual crisis; friendly ties with Belinsky were severed, who harshly criticized the writer’s ideological position expressed in “Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends.” The second volume, practically written, was burned in a moment of mental crisis, then restored, and nine days before his death, the writer again set fire to the white manuscript of the poem. The third volume remained only in the form of an idea.

For Gogol, a deeply religious man and an original writer, the most important thing was the spirituality of man, his moral foundation, and not just the external social circumstances in which his contemporary Russia found itself. He perceived both Rus' and its fate like a son, deeply experiencing everything that he observed in reality. Gogol saw Russia’s way out of the spiritual crisis not in economic and social transformations, but in the revival of morality, the cultivation of true values, including Christian ones, in the souls of people. Therefore, the assessment that the work received in democratically minded criticism and which for a long time determined the perception of the first volume of the novel - a critical image of Russian reality, the “hell” of feudal Russia - does not exhaust the concept, plot, or poetics of the poem. Thus, the problem of the philosophical and spiritual content of the work and the definition of the main philosophical conflict in the images of “Dead Souls” arises.

The purpose of our work is to analyze one of the images of the poem from the point of view of the main philosophical conflict of the poem - the landowner Korobochka.

The main research method is literary analysis of the episode of Chichikov’s meeting with Korobochka. and analysis and interpretation of artistic details.

§1. The principle of constructing images of landowners in the poem

The main philosophical problem of the poem “Dead Souls” is the problem of life and death in the human soul. This is indicated by the name itself - “dead souls”, which reflects not only the meaning of Chichikov’s adventure - the purchase of “dead”, i.e. peasants existing only on paper, in revision tales, but also, in a broader, generalized sense, the degree of deadness of the soul of each of the characters in the poem. The main conflict - life and death - is localized in the area of ​​the internal, spiritual plane. And then the composition of the first volume of the poem is divided into three parts, which form a ring composition: Chichikov’s arrival in the district town and communication with officials - a journey from landowner to landowner “according to his own need” - return to the city, scandal and departure from the city. Thus, the central motif that organizes the entire work is the motif of travel. wanderings. Wandering as the plot basis of the work is characteristic of Russian literature and reflects the idea of ​​searching for high meaning and truth, continuing the tradition of “walking” of Old Russian literature.

Chichikov travels through the Russian outback, through county towns and estates in search of “dead” souls, and the author accompanying the hero is in search of a “living” soul. Therefore, the gallery of landowners appearing before the reader in the first volume is a natural sequence of human types, among which the author is looking for someone who is capable of becoming the real master of the new Russia and reviving it economically, without destroying morality and spirituality. The sequence in which the landowners appear before us is built on two foundations: on the one hand, the degree of deadness of the soul (in other words, is the human soul alive) and sinfulness (let’s not forget about the “circles of hell”, where souls are located according to the severity of their sins) ; on the other, the opportunity to be reborn, to gain vitality, which Gogol understands as spirituality.

In the sequence of images of landowners, these two lines combine and create a double structure: each subsequent character is in a lower “circle”, the degree of his sin is heavier, death in his soul increasingly replaces life, and at the same time, each subsequent character is closer to rebirth, because According to Christian philosophy, the lower a person has fallen, the heavier his sin, the greater his suffering, the closer he is to salvation. The correctness of this interpretation is confirmed by the fact that, firstly, each subsequent landowner has a more and more detailed history of his previous life (and if a person has a past, then a future is possible), secondly, in excerpts from the burned second volume and sketches for the third, it is known that Gogol was preparing a revival for two characters - the scoundrel Chichikov and the “hole in humanity” Plyushkin, i.e. to those who are in the first volume at the very bottom of spiritual “hell”.

Therefore, we will consider the image of the landowner Korobochka from several positions:

How do life and death compare in the character’s soul?

What is Korobochka’s “sin”, and why is she between Manilov and Nozdryov?

How close is she to revival?

§2. Image of the Box

Nastasya Petrovna Korobochka is a landowner, the widow of a college secretary, a very thrifty and thrifty elderly woman. Her village is small, but everything in it is in good order, the farm is flourishing and, apparently, brings in a good income. Korobochka compares favorably with Manilov: she knows all her peasants (“... she didn’t keep any notes or lists, but knew almost everyone by heart”), speaks of them as good workers (“all are nice people, all workers.” Hereinafter quoted . from: Gogol N.V. Collected works in eight volumes. - (Library “Ogonyok”: domestic classics) - T.5. “Dead Souls” - M., 1984.), she is engaged in housekeeping. - “she fixed her eyes on the housekeeper,” “little by little she moved into economic life.” Judging by the fact that, when asking Chichikov who he is, she lists those people with whom she constantly communicates: the assessor, merchants, the archpriest, her social circle is small and is connected mainly with economic affairs - trade and the payment of state taxes.

Apparently, she rarely goes to the city and does not communicate with her neighbors, because when asked about Manilov, he answers that there is no such landowner, and names old noble families that are more appropriate in a classic comedy of the 18th century - Bobrov, Kanapatiev, Pleshakov, Kharpakin. In the same row is the surname Svinin, which draws a direct parallel with Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor” (Mitrofanushka’s mother and uncle are Svinin).

Korobochka’s behavior, her address to the guest “father”, the desire to serve (Chichikov called himself a nobleman), to treat her, to arrange for an overnight stay as best as possible - all these are characteristic features of the images of provincial landowners in the works of the 18th century. Mrs. Prostakova behaves the same way when she finds out that Starodum is a nobleman and has been accepted at court.

Korobochka, it would seem, is devout; in her speeches there are constantly sayings and expressions characteristic of a believer: “The power of the cross is with us!”, “Apparently, God sent him as a punishment,” but there is no special faith in her. When Chichikov persuades her to sell the dead peasants, promising profit, she agrees and begins to “calculate” the profit. Korobochka's confidant is the son of the archpriest, who serves in the city.

The landowner's only entertainment when she is not busy with her household is fortune-telling on cards - “I decided to make fortunes on cards at night after prayer...”. And she spends her evenings with the maid.

Korobochka's portrait is not as detailed as the portraits of other landowners and seems to be stretched out: first Chichikov hears the “hoarse woman's voice” of the old servant; then “again some woman, younger than before, but very similar to her”; when he was shown into the rooms and he had time to look around, a lady came in - “an elderly woman, in some kind of sleeping cap, put on hastily, with a flannel around her neck, ....” The author emphasizes Korobochka’s old age, then Chichikov directly calls her an old woman to himself. The housewife’s appearance in the morning does not change much - only the sleeping cap disappears: “She was dressed better than yesterday - in a dark dress ( widow!) and no longer in a sleeping cap ( but apparently there was still a cap on his head - a day cap), but there was still something tied around the neck" ( end fashionXVIIIcentury - fichu, i.e. a small scarf that partially covered the neckline and the ends of which were tucked into the necklineAtya See Kirsanova R.M. Costume in Russian artistic culture of the 18th - first half of the 20th centuries: Experience of an encyclopedia / Ed. T.G. Morozova, V.D. Sinyukova. - M., 1995. - P.115 ).

The author's description, which follows the portrait of the hostess, on the one hand emphasizes the typicality of the character, on the other hand, gives a comprehensive description: “one of those mothers, small landowners who cry when the harvest fails ( precisely with words about crop failure and bad times a business conversation between Korobochka and Chichikov begins), losses and keep your head somewhat to one side, and meanwhile they are gradually gaining a little money in motley Motley - fabric from the remnants of yarn of various kinds, homespun fabric (Kirsanova) bags placed in dresser drawers. All the rubles are taken into one bag, fifty rubles into another, quarters into the third, although in appearance it seems as if there is nothing in the chest of drawers except underwear, night blouses, skeins of thread, and a ripped salop Salop - outerwear made of fur and the rich fabrics that had gone out of fashion by 1830; the name “salopnitsa” has an additional connotation of “old-fashioned” (Kirsanova). Apparently, for this purpose Gogol mentions the cloak as an indispensable attribute of such landowners. , which will then turn into a dress if the old one somehow burns out during the baking of festive cakes with all sorts of yarn. Yarn is a filling that was laid out directly on the baking cake or pancake, in other words, baked. or it will disappear on its own. But the dress will not burn or fray on its own; thrifty old lady..." This is exactly what Korobochka is, so Chichikov immediately does not stand on ceremony and gets down to business.

An important role in understanding the image of the landowner is played by the description of the estate and the decoration of the rooms in the house. This is one of the techniques for characterizing a character that Gogol uses in “Dead Souls”: the image of all landowners consists of the same set of descriptions and artistic details - the estate, rooms, interior details or significant objects, an indispensable feast (in one form or another - from a full dinner , like Sobakevich, before Plyushkin’s offer of Easter cake and wine), the owner’s manners and behavior during business negotiations and after them, attitude towards an unusual transaction, etc.

Korobochka's estate is distinguished by its strength and contentment; it is immediately clear that she is a good housewife. The courtyard into which the room's windows overlook is filled with birds and “all kinds of domestic creatures”; further on you can see vegetable gardens with “household vegetables”; fruit trees are covered with bird nets, and stuffed animals on poles are also visible - “one of them was wearing the cap of the mistress herself.” Peasant huts also show the wealth of their inhabitants. In a word, Korobochka’s farm is clearly thriving and generating sufficient profit. And the village itself is not small - eighty souls.

The description of the estate is divided into two parts - at night, in the rain, and during the day. The first description is scanty, motivated by the fact that Chichikov drives up in the dark, during heavy rain. But in this part of the text there is also an artistic detail, which, in our opinion, is essential for the further narrative - a mention of the external villa of the house: “stopped<бричка>in front of a small house, which was difficult to see in the darkness. Only one half of it was illuminated by the light coming from the windows; a puddle was still visible in front of the house, which was directly hit by the same light.” Chichikov is also greeted by the barking of dogs, which indicates that “the village was decent.” The windows of a house are a kind of eyes, and eyes, as we know, are the mirror of the soul. Therefore, the fact that Chichikov drives up to the house in the dark, only one window is illuminated and the light from it falls into a puddle, speaks, most likely, about the poverty of inner life, about the focus on one side of it, about the mundane aspirations of the owners of this house.

The “daytime” description, as mentioned earlier, emphasizes precisely this one-sidedness of Korobochka’s inner life - the focus only on economic activity, thrift and thrift.

The brief description of the rooms first of all notes the antiquity of their decoration: “the room was hung with old striped wallpaper; paintings with some birds; between the windows there are old small mirrors with dark frames in the shape of curled leaves; Behind every mirror there was either a letter, or an old deck of cards, or a stocking; wall clock with painted flowers on the dial...” In this description, two features clearly stand out - linguistic and artistic. Firstly, the synonyms “old”, “vintage” and “old” are used; secondly, the set of objects that catch Chichikov’s eye during a brief examination also indicates that the people living in such rooms are more drawn to the past than to the present. What is important is that flowers are mentioned several times (on the watch dial, leaves on the mirror frames) and birds. If we recall the history of the interior, we can find out that such a “design” is typical for the Rococo era, i.e. for the second half of the 18th century.

Later in the episode, the description of the room is supplemented by one more detail, which confirms the “antiqueness” of Korobochka’s life: Chichikov discovers in the morning two portraits on the wall - Kutuzov and “some old man with red cuffs on his uniform, as they were sewn on under Pavel Petrovich

In the conversation about the purchase of “dead” souls, the whole essence and character of Korobochka is revealed. At first, she cannot understand what Chichikov wants from her - dead peasants have no economic value, and therefore cannot be sold. When she realizes that the deal can be profitable for her, then bewilderment gives way to another - the desire to get the maximum benefit from the sale: after all, if someone wants to buy the dead, therefore, they are worth something and are the subject of bargaining. That is, dead souls become for her on a par with hemp, honey, flour and lard. But she has already sold everything else (as we know, quite profitably), and this is a new and unknown business for her. The desire not to undercut the price is triggered: “I started to be very afraid that this buyer would somehow cheat her,” “I was afraid at first, so as not to somehow incur a loss. Maybe you, my father, are deceiving me, but they are... they are somehow worth more”, “I’ll wait a little, maybe merchants will come, and I’ll adjust the prices”, “somehow they’ll be needed on the farm in case they’re needed...”. With her stubbornness, she infuriates Chichikov, who was counting on easy consent. This is where the epithet arises, which expresses the essence not only of Korobochka, but of the entire type of similar people - “club-headed”. The author explains that neither rank nor position in society is the reason for this property; “club-headedness” is a very common phenomenon: “someone is both respectable and even a statesman. but in reality it turns out to be a perfect Box. Once you've hacked something into your head, you can't overpower him with anything; No matter how much you present him with arguments, clear as day, everything bounces off him, like a rubber ball bounces off a wall.”

Korobochka agrees when Chichikov offers her another deal that she understands - government contracts, that is, a state supply order that paid well and was beneficial for the landowner due to its stability.

The author ends the bidding episode with a generalized discussion about the prevalence of this type of people: “Is Korobochka really standing so low on the endless ladder of human improvement? Is the abyss really that great that separates her from her sister, inaccessibly fenced by the walls of an aristocratic house with fragrant cast-iron staircases, shining copper, mahogany and carpets, yawning over an unread book in anticipation of a witty social visit, where she will have the opportunity to show off her mind and express her expressed thoughts? thoughts that, according to the laws of fashion, occupy the city for a whole week, thoughts not about what is happening in her house and on her estates, confused and upset thanks to ignorance of economic affairs, but about what political revolution is being prepared in France, what direction fashionable Catholicism has taken " The comparison of the thrifty, thrifty and practical Korobochka with the worthless society lady makes one wonder what is Korobochka’s “sin”, is it just her “club-headedness”?

Thus, we have several grounds for determining the meaning of the image of Korobochka - an indication of her “club-headedness,” i.e. getting stuck on one thought, inability and inability to consider the situation from different sides, limited thinking; comparison with the habitually established life of a society lady; the clear dominance of the past in everything related to the cultural components of human life, embodied in fashion, interior design, speech and rules of etiquette in relation to other people.

Is it a coincidence that Chichikov ends up with Korobochka after wandering along a dirty and dark road, at night, during the rain? It can be suggested that these details metaphorically reflect the nature of the image - the lack of spirituality (darkness, rare reflections of light from the window) and the aimlessness - in spiritual and moral terms - of her existence (the confusing road, by the way, the girl who accompanies Chichikov to the main road confuses right and left). Then the logical answer to the question about the landowner’s “sin” will be the absence of the life of the soul, the existence of which has collapsed to one point - the distant past, when the deceased husband was still alive, who loved to have his heels scratched before going to bed. The clock that hardly strikes the appointed hour, the flies that wake up Chichikov in the morning, the confusion of the roads to the estate, the lack of external contacts with the world - all this confirms our point of view.

Thus, Korobochka embodies a state of mind in which life is reduced to a single point and remains somewhere far behind, in the past. Therefore, the author emphasizes that Korobochka is an old woman. And no future is possible for her, therefore, it is impossible to be reborn, i.e. It is not destined to unfold life to the fullness of being.

The reason for this lies in the initially unspiritual life of a woman in Russia, in her traditional position, but not social, but psychological. The comparison with a society lady and the details about how Korobochka spends her “free time” (fortune telling on cards, housework) reflect the absence of any intellectual, cultural, spiritual life. Later in the poem, the reader will encounter an explanation of the reasons for this state of a woman and her soul in Chichikov’s monologue after meeting a beautiful stranger, when the hero discusses what happens to a pure and simple girl and how “rubbish” turns out of her.

Korobochka’s “club-headedness” also receives a precise meaning: it is not excessive practicality or commercialism, but a limited mind, which is determined by a single thought or belief and is a consequence of the general limitations of life. And it is the “club-headed” Korobochka, who never gave up the thought of a possible deception on the part of Chichikov and comes to the city to inquire “how much are dead souls these days,” becomes one of the reasons for the collapse of the hero’s adventure and his rapid flight from the city.

Why does Chichikov get to Korobochka after Manilov and before meeting Nozdryov? As was said earlier, the sequence of images of landowners is built along two lines. The first is descending: the degree of “sin” in each subsequent case becomes more severe, responsibility for the state of the soul increasingly lies with the person himself. The second is ascending: how possible is it for a character to revive his life and “resurrect” his soul?

Manilov lives quite openly - he appears in the city, is present at evenings and meetings, communicates, but his life is similar to a sentimental novel, and therefore illusory: he is very reminiscent in appearance, reasoning, and attitude towards people of the hero of sentimental and romantic works, fashionable at the beginning of the 19th century. One can guess about his past - a good education, short government service, retirement, marriage and life with his family on the estate. Manilov does not understand that his existence is not connected with reality, therefore he cannot realize that his life is not going as it should. If we draw a parallel with Dante's "Divine Comedy", then he is more reminiscent of sinners of the first circle, whose sin is that they are unbaptized infants or pagans. But the possibility of rebirth is closed to him for the same reason: his life is an illusion, and he does not realize it.

The box is too immersed in the material world. If Manilov is entirely in fantasy, then she is in the prose of life, and intellectual and spiritual life comes down to habitual prayers and the same habitual piety. The fixation on material things, on profit, the one-sidedness of her life is worse than Manilov’s fantasies.

Could Korobochka's life have turned out differently? Yes and no. The influence of the surrounding world, society, circumstances left their mark on her, making her inner world what it is. But there was still a way out - sincere faith in God. As we will see later, it is true Christian morality, from Gogol’s point of view, that is the saving force that keeps a person from spiritual fall and spiritual death. Therefore, the image of Korobochka cannot be considered a satirical image - her one-sidedness, “club-headedness” no longer evokes laughter, but sad reflections: “But why, in the midst of unthinking, cheerful, carefree minutes, will another wonderful stream suddenly rush by itself: laughter has not yet had time to completely escape from the face , and already became different among the same people, and his face was illuminated with a different light..."

A further meeting with Nozdryov - a scoundrel, a brawler and a rogue - shows that worse than the one-sidedness of life can be dishonor, a willingness to do nasty things to one’s neighbor, sometimes for no reason at all, and excessive activity that has no purpose. In this respect, Nozdryov is a kind of antipode to Korobochka: instead of one-sidedness of life - excessive scatteredness, instead of veneration of rank - contempt for any conventions, even to the point of violating the elementary norms of human relations and behavior. Gogol himself said: “...My heroes follow one after another, one more vulgar than the other.” Vulgarity is a spiritual fall, and the degree of vulgarity in life is the degree of triumph of death over life in the human soul.

So, the image of Korobochka reflects the widespread, from the author’s point of view, type of people who limit their lives to only one sphere, who “rest their foreheads” on one thing and do not see, and most importantly - do not want to see - anything that exists apart from the subject of their attention. Gogol chooses the material sphere - taking care of the household. The box reaches a level sufficient in this area for a woman, a widow, who has to manage a decent-sized estate. But her life is so concentrated on this that she does not and cannot have any other interests. Therefore, her real life remains in the past, and the present, and especially the future, is not life. but only existence.

§3. Artistic detail as a means of characterizing a character

In addition to the artistic details mentioned above, the episode contains references to objects that are also important for understanding the image of the Box.

An important detail is the clock: “... the wall clock began to want to strike. The hissing was immediately followed by wheezing, and finally, straining with all their might, they struck two o’clock with a sound as if someone were beating a broken pot with a stick, after which the pendulum began to calmly click again to the right and left.” A watch is always a symbol of time and the future. The lethargy, again a certain oldness of the clocks (and therefore the time) in Korobochka’s house, emphasizes the same lethargy of life.

In addition to the clock, time is also represented in Korobochka’s speech. It does not use calendar terms to designate dates, but is guided by church and folk holidays (Christmastide, Philip Fast), characteristic of popular speech. This testifies not so much to the closeness of the landowner’s way of life to the folk one, but to her lack of education.

There are two interesting artistic details that relate to parts of Korobochka's toilet: the cap on the scarecrow and the stocking behind the mirror. if the first characterizes it from the point of view of only practical orientation and the likeness of a person (after all, a scarecrow should depict a person), then the role of the second detail is unclear. It can be assumed, judging by the row “letter” - “old deck of cards” - “stocking”, that this is some kind of entertainment or girlish fortune-telling, which also confirms that Korobochka’s life is in the past.

The description of the yard and the description of the room begin with the mention of birds (chickens and turkeys in the yard, “some” birds in the paintings, “indirect clouds” of magpies and sparrows), and also additionally characterizes the essence of the mistress of the estate - her soul is down to earth, practicality is the main measure of values .

In Korobochka’s speech there are not only colloquial and folk expressions, but also words characteristic of the past era - “avantageous”.

In general, we can say that the artistic detail in Gogol’s poem is a means of characterizing the character, adding nuances or implicitly indicating the essential features of the image.

§4. Korobochka and Chichikov

Gogol's poem "Dead Souls" is structured in such a way that upon careful, thoughtful reading you understand that the characters Chichikov meets - officials and landowners - are connected with the hero not only by the plot line. Firstly, the story of Chichikov himself is placed at the very end of the first volume, which means that he must also obey the laws of constructing the poem - ascending and descending lines. Secondly, Chichikov has the amazing property of immediately choosing exactly the manner of behavior and the motivation for the offer to sell “dead” souls that is most suitable for the interlocutor. Is this just a natural skill, a property of his character? As we see from Chichikov’s life story, this trait was inherent in him from the very beginning, almost from childhood - he always guessed a person’s weak point and the possibility of a “loophole into the soul.” In our opinion, this can be explained by: that the hero contains in concentrated form all these officials and landowners, whom he cleverly deceives, using them as a means of achieving personal goals. And this idea is most confirmed in the episode of the meeting with Korobochka.

Why exactly in this part of the poem, when agreement with the “club-headed” landowner has been reached, does the author give a detailed description of Chichikov’s traveling box, as if the reader is looking over his shoulder and seeing something hidden? After all, we meet with a description of the hero’s other things already in the first chapter.

If we imagine that this box is a kind of house (every character in the poem necessarily has a house, from which, in fact, the characterization begins), and Gogol’s house, its appearance and interior decoration symbolize the state of a person’s soul, his entire essence, then then Chichikov’s box characterizes him as a person with a double and even triple bottom.

The first tier is what everyone sees: an intelligent interlocutor, capable of supporting the desired topic, a respectable person, at the same time businesslike and able to have a varied and decent time. The same is in the box - in the top drawer, which can be removed, “in the very middle is a soap dish, behind the soap dish are six or seven narrow partitions for razors; then square nooks for a sandbox and an inkwell with a boat hollowed out between them for feathers, sealing wax and everything that is longer; then all sorts of partitions with lids and without lids for something shorter, filled with business cards, funeral tickets, theater tickets and others, which were folded up as souvenirs.”

The second layer of Chichikov’s personality is a businessman, a prudent and clever buyer of “dead souls”. And in the box - “there was a space occupied by stacks of sheets of paper.”

And finally, what is hidden in the very depths and unknown to most people who have dealt with the hero is the main goal of the hero’s life, his dream about money and what this money gives in life - prosperity, honor, respect: “then followed the secret a drawer for money that pulled out discreetly from the side of the box. He always pulled out so hastily and was moved back at the same moment by the owner that it’s probably impossible to say how much money was there.” Here it is, the true essence of the hero - benefit, income on which his future depends.

The fact that this description is located precisely in the chapter dedicated to Korobochka emphasizes an important idea: Chichikov is also a little Korobochka, as, indeed, are Manilov, and Nozdryov, and Sobakevich, and Plyushkin. That’s why he understands people so well, that’s why he knows how to adapt, adapt to another person, because he himself is a little bit of that person.

Conclusion

The image of Korobochka is one of the gallery of human types presented in Gogol’s poem “Dead Souls”. The author uses various means of creating an image: direct characterization and generalization to a common type, artistic details included in the description of the estate, interior, appearance and demeanor of the character. An important characteristic is the character’s reaction to Chichikov’s proposal to sell “dead” souls. The character's behavior reveals the true human essence, because the opportunity to make a profit without spending practically anything is important for landowners.

Korobochka appears before the reader as a limited, stupid old woman, whose interests relate only to farming and making a profit. There is nothing in her that leaves signs of spiritual life: no true faith, no interests, no aspirations. The only thing that worries her in a conversation with Chichikov is not to undercut the price, although the subject of the bargain is unusual and even at first frightens and bewilders her. But the reason for this is, for the most part, the education system itself and the position of women in society.

Thus, Korobochka is one of the types of landowners and human types that make up the image of Gogol’s contemporary Russia.

List of used literature

1. Gogol N.V. Collected Works in eight volumes. - (Library "Ogonyok": domestic classics) - T.5. "Dead Souls". Volume one. - M., 1984.

2. Kirsanova R.M. Costume in Russian artistic culture of the 18th - first half of the 20th centuries: Experience of an encyclopedia / Ed. T.G. Morozova, V.D. Sinyukova. - M., 1995. - P.115

3. Razumikhin A. “Dead Souls” Experience of modern reading // Literature (Appendix to “First of September”). - No. 13 (532). - April 1-7, 2004.

Similar documents

Creative history of Gogol's poem "Dead Souls". Traveling with Chichikov around Russia is a wonderful way to understand the life of Nikolaev Russia: a road adventure, city attractions, living room interiors, business partners of a clever acquirer.

essay, added 12/26/2010


A study of Gogol's method of characterizing heroes and social structure through portrait and everyday details. The artistic world of the poem "Dead Souls". Principles of revealing the characters of landowners. The hidden character traits of the hero. The basis of the plot of the poem.

abstract, added 03/27/2011


The history of the creation of the poem "Dead Souls". The purpose of Chichikov's life, the behest of his father. The primary meaning of the expression "dead souls". The second volume of "Dead Souls" as a crisis in Gogol's work. "Dead Souls" as one of the most readable and revered works of Russian classics.

abstract, added 02/09/2011


The meaning of the title of the poem “Dead Souls” and the definition of N.V. Gogol of her genre. The history of the creation of the poem, features of the storyline, the original combination of darkness and light, the special tone of the narrative. Critical materials about the poem, its influence and genius.

abstract, added 05/11/2009


A poem in which all of Rus' appeared - all of Russia in cross-section, all its vices and shortcomings. The world of landowner Russia in the poem by N.V. Gogol's "Dead Souls" and a satire on the terrible landowner Rus'. Feudal Rus'. The fate of the Motherland and the people in pictures of Russian life.

abstract, added 03/21/2008


The artistic originality of Gogol's poem "Dead Souls". Description of the extraordinary history of writing the poem. The concept of "poetic" in "Dead Souls", which is not limited to direct lyricism and the author's intervention in the narrative. The image of the author in the poem.

test, added 10/16/2010


Pushkin-Gogol period of Russian literature. The influence of the situation in Russia on Gogol’s political views. The history of the creation of the poem "Dead Souls". Formation of its plot. Symbolic space in Gogol's "Dead Souls". Representation of 1812 in the poem.

thesis, added 12/03/2012


The concept and sources of the poem "Dead Souls". Its genre originality, features of plot and composition. Gogol's poem as a critical image of life and customs of the 19th century. The image of Chichikov and the landowners in the work. Lyrical digressions and their ideological content.

course work, added 05/24/2016


Features of the everyday environment as a characteristic of landowners from the poem by N.V. Gogol's "Dead Souls": Manilov, Korobochki, Nozdryov, Sobakevich, Plyushkin. Distinctive features of these estates, specificity depending on the characters of the owners described by Gogol.

course work, added 03/26/2011


Gogol's artistic world is the comic and realism of his creations. Analysis of lyrical fragments in the poem "Dead Souls": ideological content, compositional structure of the work, stylistic features. Gogol's language and its significance in the history of the Russian language.

In what works of Russian literature are images of landowners presented and in what ways can these characters be compared with Plyushkin?

The images of provincial landowners are presented in the novel in verse “Eugene Onegin” by A.S. Pushkin and in the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” by N.A. Nekrasova.

Pushkin's heroes are similar to Plyushkin in some personal qualities. Thus, the poet emphasizes the low intellectual level of provincial landowners and their low spiritual needs. Their interests do not go beyond household chores, household chores, the subject of conversation is “haymaking”, “kennel”, stories about “their relatives”. In addition, these heroes from A.S. Pushkin are individualized, they represent characteristic artistic types. These characters are most characteristically outlined in the scene of the ball held in the Larins’ house on the occasion of Tatyana’s name day. Here

A.S. Pushkin presents us with images in line with the literary tradition: for example, adviser Flyanov refers us to the comedy of A.S. Griboyedov's "Woe from Wit", and the "district dandy" Petushkov, the "perky" Buyanov, Gvozdin, "an excellent owner, the owner of poor men" seem to anticipate the heroes of N.V. Gogol in the poem “Dead Souls”. Portrait details are characteristic. Pushkin’s “county dandy” Petushkov reminds us of Manilov, whose appearance was “too much of a sugary touch.” Buyanov, “in fluff, in a cap with a visor,” of course, is associated with Nozdryov: Gvozdin, the last character, reminds us of Gogol’s Plyushkin.

Thus, both A.S. Pushkin, and N.V. Gogol created certain literary types that were quite realistic and recognizable.

In the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” by N.A. Nekrasov we also encounter images of provincial landowners. Their characteristic features are tyranny, lack of spirituality, and lack of genuine, deep interests. Such heroes in Nekrasov are the landowner Obolt-Obolduev and Prince Utyatin. Like N.V. Gogol, N.A. Nekrasov critically evaluates these characters, depicting them in satirical colors. The author's attitude is already inherent in the hero's surname - Obolt-Obolduev. The author's mockery and subtle irony are heard in the portrait of this character:

The landowner was rosy-cheeked,

Stately, planted,

Sixty years old.

The dialogue with the peasants reveals such traits of the landowner as his longing for his old life, despotism and tyranny:

I will have mercy on whomever I want,

I'll execute whoever I want.

Law is my desire!

The fist is my police!

The blow is sparkling,

The blow is tooth-breaking,

Cheeky asshole!..

In the description of Prince Utyatin, the author’s frank sarcasm sounds:

Nose beak like a hawk's

The mustache is gray, long,

And - different eyes:

One healthy one glows,

And the left one is cloudy, cloudy,

Like a tin penny!

This hero also appears in the poem as a despot and tyrant, a man out of his mind, giving ridiculous orders to his peasants.

Thus, the heroes of the novel by A.S. Pushkin's characters are similar to Gogol's characters in their personal qualities. We also note the authors’ critical view of their heroes in all three works.

Searched here:

• in which works of Russian literature are images of landowners presented?
• images of landowners in Russian literature
• in which works of Russian literature are images of landowners presented and in what ways can they be compared with the character of Nekrasov’s work

In what works of Russian literature are provincial landowners represented and in what ways can these characters be compared with Manilov?

Read the text fragment below and complete tasks B1-B7; C1-C2.

Approaching the yard, Chichikov noticed the owner himself on the porch, who stood in a green shallot frock coat, putting his hand to his forehead in the form of an umbrella over his eyes in order to get a better look at the approaching carriage. As the chaise approached the porch, his eyes became more cheerful and his smile widened more and more.

- Pavel Ivanovich! - he finally cried out when Chichikov climbed out of the chaise. - You really remembered us!

Both friends kissed very hard, and _______ took his guest into the room. Although the time during which they will pass through the entryway, the front hall and the dining room is somewhat short, we will try to see if we somehow have time to use it and say something about the owner of the house. But here the author must admit that such an undertaking is very difficult. It is much easier to depict large characters: there, just throw paint from your entire hand onto the canvas, black scorching eyes, drooping eyebrows, a wrinkled forehead, a cloak black or scarlet like fire thrown over your shoulder - and the portrait is ready; but all these gentlemen, of whom there are many in the world, who look very similar to each other, and yet when you look closely, you will see many of the most elusive features - these gentlemen are terribly difficult for portraits. Here you will have to greatly strain your attention until you force all the subtle, almost invisible features to appear before you, and in general you will have to deepen your gaze, already sophisticated in the science of prying.

God alone could tell what kind of character ________ was. There is a kind of people known by the name: so-so people, neither this nor that, neither in the city of Bogdan nor in the village of Selifan, according to the proverb. Maybe ________ should join them. In appearance he was a distinguished man; His facial features were not devoid of pleasantness, but this pleasantness seemed to have too much sugar in it; in his techniques and turns there was something ingratiating favor and acquaintance. He smiled enticingly, was blond, with blue eyes. In the first minute of a conversation with him, you can’t help but say: “What a pleasant and kind person!” The next minute you won’t say anything, and the third you’ll say: “The devil knows what it is!” - and move away; If you don’t leave, you will feel mortal boredom.

N.V. Gogol “Dead Souls”

How did N.V. Gogol himself define the genre of “Dead Souls”?

Explanation.

“Dead Souls” is a work by the writer Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol, the genre of which the author himself designated as a poem. It was originally conceived as a three-volume work.

Answer: poem.

Answer: poem

Indicate the character's last name to be inserted in place of the blanks.

Explanation.

The hero's surname at the place of the passes is Manilov, a sentimental landowner, the first “seller” of dead souls.

Answer: Manilov.

Answer: Manilov

Source: Yandex: Unified State Exam training work in literature. Option 2.

In the first volume of Dead Souls, Chichikov visited five landowners. Indicate with a number what order the landowner from the above passage was.

Explanation.

Manilov was the first.

Answer: 1.

Answer: 1

Source: Yandex: Unified State Exam training work in literature. Option 2.

Tatiana Statsenko

The Unified State Exam instructions suggest writing ordinal numbers in words in the nominative case. This task was included in the database I will SOLVE the Unified State Exam based on Internet materials, therefore, probably, it is not in the format of the official FIPI demo version and requires recording the answer.

What is the name of the image of a hero’s appearance in a literary work (facial features, figures, facial expressions, gestures, clothes)?

Explanation.

Portrait is a recreation of the appearance of characters in epic and dramatic works, the appearance of people in lyrical poems (face, figure, clothing, gait, gestures, demeanor). This is one of the main techniques for depicting a person in a literary work. A portrait, emphasizing a person’s individual, unique features, is an important means of creating his image.

Answer: portrait.

Answer: portrait

Source: Yandex: Unified State Exam training work in literature. Option 2.

In the above passage, the character is characterized by a proverb (neither in the city of Bogdan nor in the village of Selifan). Establish a correspondence between the other three characters and their “proverbial”, phraseological characteristics. For each position in the first column, select the corresponding position from the second column.

Write down the numbers in your answer, arranging them in the order corresponding to the letters:

Explanation.

A−3: Nozdryov is a historical person. Nozdryov (N) is the third landowner from whom Chichikov is trying to buy dead souls. This is a dashing 35-year-old “talker, carouser, reckless driver.” N. lies constantly, bullies everyone indiscriminately; he is very passionate, ready to “take a shit” on his best friend without any purpose. N.’s entire behavior is explained by his dominant quality: “nimbleness and liveliness of character,” that is, unrestrainedness bordering on unconsciousness. N. doesn’t think or plan anything; he simply does not know the limits in anything. N. is a broken, frivolous person. He easily loses at cards. Nozdryov is a master of “pouring bullets”. He is a liar, but he is a liar under duress. He deliberately strings one lie onto another. Perhaps in this way he is trying to draw attention to himself. This person can easily betray; he does not know such a thing as strong friendship.

B−1: Sobakevich is poorly tailored, but tightly sewn. Sobakevich Mikhailo Semenych is a landowner, the fourth “seller” of dead souls. The very name and appearance of this hero (reminiscent of a “medium-sized bear”, his tailcoat is of a “completely bearish” color, he walks at random, his complexion is “red-hot, hot”) indicate the power of his nature.

Q−2: Plyushkin is a hole in humanity. Stepan Plyushkin is the last “seller” of dead souls. This hero personifies the complete death of the human soul. In the image of P., the author shows the death of a bright and strong personality, consumed by the passion of stinginess. The description of P.'s estate (“he does not grow rich according to God”) depicts the desolation and “cluttering” of the hero’s soul. The entrance is dilapidated, there is a special disrepair everywhere, the roofs are like a sieve, the windows are covered with rags. Everything here is lifeless - even the two churches, which should be the soul of the estate.

Read the passage below and complete activity C2.

Yes, do you need a register of all these parasites? Well, as I knew, I wrote them all down on a special piece of paper so that when I first submitted the revision, I could cross them all out.

Plyushkin put on his glasses and began rummaging through the papers. Untying all sorts of ties, he treated his guest to such dust that he sneezed. Finally he pulled out a piece of paper, all covered with writing. Peasant names covered her closely, like midges. There were all sorts of people there: Paramonov, and Pimenov, and Panteleimonov, and even some Grigory looked out; There were more than a hundred and twenty in all. Chichikov smiled at the sight of such numbers. Having hidden it in his pocket, he noticed to Plyushkin that he would need to come to the city to complete the fortress.

In town? But how?.., but how to leave the house? After all, my people are either a thief or a swindler: they will steal so much in a day that they won’t have anything to hang their caftan on.

So don't you know anyone?

Who do you know? All my friends died or became separated. Ah, fathers! how not to have, I have! - he screamed. - After all, the chairman himself is familiar, he even came to see me in the old years, how could he not know! We were teammates and climbed fences together! how can you not be familiar? so familiar! So shouldn't I write to him?

And of course, to him.

Why, so familiar! I had friends at school.

And on this wooden face suddenly some kind of warm ray slid, it was not a feeling that was expressed, but some kind of pale reflection of a feeling, a phenomenon similar to the unexpected appearance of a drowning person on the surface of the waters, which produced a joyful cry in the crowd that surrounded the shore. But in vain, the overjoyed brothers and sisters throw a rope from the shore and wait to see if the back or arms tired from the struggle will flash again - this was the last appearance. Everything is silent, and after that the quiet surface of the unresponsive element becomes even more terrible and deserted. So Plyushkin’s face, following the feeling that instantly slid across it, became even more insensitive and even more vulgar.

“There was a quarter of blank paper lying on the table,” he said, “but I don’t know where it went: my people are so worthless!”

Then he began to look under and on the table, rummaged everywhere and finally shouted: “Mavra! and Mavra! A woman answered the call with a plate in her hands, on which lay a cracker, already familiar to the reader. And the following conversation took place between them:

Where are you going, robber, paper?

By God, master, haven’t you seen the small piece of cloth with which you deigned to cover the glass?

But I can see in my eyes that I’ve tinkered.

But what would I like? After all, I have no use with her; I don't know how to read and write.

You're lying, you demolished the sexton: he's messing around, so you demolished it for him.

Yes, the sexton, if he wants, can get himself papers. He hasn't seen your scrap!

Just wait a minute: at the Last Judgment the devils will beat you up with iron slingshots for this! You'll see how they cook!

But why will they punish me if I didn’t even pick up a quarter? It’s more likely some other woman’s weakness, but no one has ever reproached me for theft.

But the devils will get you! They’ll say: “Here’s to you, you swindler, for deceiving the master!”, and they’ll give you a hot roast!

And I’ll say: you’re welcome! By God, no way, I didn’t take it... Yes, there she is lying on the table. You always reproach us unnecessarily!

Plyushkin saw, for sure, a four and stopped for a minute, chewed his lips and said: “Well, why did you disagree like that? What a pain! Tell her just one word, and she’ll answer with a dozen! Go and bring the light to seal the letter. Wait, you grab a tallow candle, tallow is a sticky business: it will burn - yes and no, only a loss; and bring me a splinter!”

Mavra left, and Plyushkin, sitting down in an armchair and taking the pen in his hand, spent a long time turning the four in all directions, wondering if it was possible to separate another eight from it, but finally became convinced that it was impossible; stuck the pen into an inkwell with some kind of moldy liquid and a lot of flies at the bottom and began to write, making letters that looked like musical notes, constantly holding his agility hand, which was jumping all over the paper, sparingly molding line after line, and not without regret, thinking about that there will still be a lot of blank space left.

N.V. Gogol, “Dead Souls”.

C2. In what works of Russian literature are provincial landowners represented and in what ways can these characters be compared with Plyushkin?

Along with N.V. Gogol, A.S. Pushkin, N.A. Nekrasov, M.E. Saltykov-Shchedrin and many other Russian writers, using various techniques of satirical depiction (for example, telling surnames, vivid epithets and metaphors, hyperbole, speech and portrait characteristics), created images of provincial landowners in their works.

Provincial landowners are described by A. Pushkin in the novel “Eugene Onegin”. Let's remember Dmitry Larin, Tatyana's father. He was a “simple and kind fellow”, “he ate and drank in his dressing gown” and “died an hour before dinner.” Such is Onegin’s uncle: “for about forty years he scolded the housekeeper, looked out the window and crushed flies.” These good-natured lazy people lived without any purpose. Pushkin also shows the guests at Tatyana’s name day: fat Pustyakov, Gvozdin, “an excellent host, the owner of poor men,” arrived.

A number of landowners are depicted in the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” by N.A. Nekrasov. One of them is Obolt-Obolduev - “round,” “mustachioed,” “pot-bellied, with a cigar in his mouth.” This is exactly how the peasants see the landowner, and diminutive suffixes convey a contemptuous attitude towards the former owner of serf souls. Obolt-Obolduev does not realize the insignificance of his own existence and yearns for his unlimited power - to “execute” or “have mercy.”

A comparison of heroes from different works of art allows us to draw a conclusion: provincial landowners are distinguished by empty, worthless pastime, their interests are primitive and wretched.

Reva Tatyana, 11 A class of 2013

Essay – Images of landowners in the work “Dead Souls”. (Var 1)

Poem by N.V. Gogol’s “Dead Souls” is not only a description of the life and way of life of the Russian people in the nineteenth century, the writer in a satirical manner was able to show the most terrible human vices. According to the plot of the work, the main character Pavel Ivanovich Chichikov encounters them throughout his entire journey. The author clearly shows us how selfish, greedy, cruel and empty people can be - the images of the landowners of a small town clearly illustrate this.

Self-interest and greed

Chichikov's path begins with a meeting with Manilov. At first glance, it seems that a more honest, correct, kinder, more caring and nicer person cannot be found. But, as often happens, first impressions are very deceiving. Manilov is not at all worried about his relatives, and he is not interested in serfs at all. A very stupid, lazy, empty person. His attentiveness and kindness can be put in quotation marks. Chichikov quickly discovers these human vices Manilova understands that for this carefree person, the only thing that matters is his own comfort.

After Manilov, the landowner Korobochka introduced herself to Chichikov as a completely different person. She is very economical and greedy, her life is limited to everyday worries, everything counts, no extravagance. Despite this, the landowner also has positive qualities - kindness and hard work, but the woman’s strong limited interests make her very stupid. Even when selling dead souls, she very reluctantly agrees to this because of her greed, saying: “...I’d better wait a little longer...”.

Cruelty and idleness

Even more unpleasant N.V. Gogol made images of other heroes of the poem - Nozdryov and Sobakevich. The first is a completely empty person, his life consists of constant partying, drinking and entertainment. Nozdryov spends his money only on entertainment and dubious companies. Sobakevich is the complete opposite of Nozdryov, his practicality borders on pettiness. Cunning and cruel, he trusts only himself and cares only about his money.

The deadest soul

Merge everything human vices in “Dead Souls” Gogol succeeded in the image of Plyushkin. His stinginess borders on the absurd: the landowner stores food that rots, the house is full of expensive things, they deteriorate over time. There is dirt and dust all around, he avoids his own children and collects unnecessary things.

Through the created images of landowners, the author was able to perfectly show what was happening in Russia at that time. Human vices are depicted very vividly and clearly, forcing each reader to involuntarily look into his soul and see what others may not notice.

Essay – Images of landowners in the work “Dead Souls”. (Var 2)

Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol is a great writer who raises important social topics in his works. So in the poem “Dead Souls” it not only describes in the smallest detail the life of that time, but also the characteristics of the landowners, their vices and shortcomings. At the center of the story is a provincial town. There Pavel Chichikov deals with various landowners.

Opposite images

First, the main character meets Manilov. He is quite caring, honest and correct. The landowner gives the impression of a good person. But you shouldn't believe your first impression. Manilov only hides behind a mask of piety. This person is a real egoist who cares only about his own well-being. He is forced to demonstrate kindness in order to gain favor in this world.

The opposite of Manilov is the secretary Korobochka. She has a different set of qualities. She only cares about the household. She is not a spender, unlike the landowner. The box can be called a good woman with a kind heart. But she is practically not interested in anything, she has no occupation for her soul. The woman is always trying to save money. Even when selling dead souls, she takes time, demonstrating greed.

Pavel Chichikov has to deal with unpleasant personalities. One can safely include Sobakevich among them. This person has a distrust of the whole world. He is cruel and petty. Chichikov himself compares him to a medium-sized bear. Another unpleasant type is Nozdryov. The man spends his fortune on entertainment. He gets mixed up with dubious companies. They consist of drunkards, gamblers and other antisocial individuals.

The most interesting person is Plyushkin. The landowner's appearance is quite awkward. It contains the features of both women and men. Plyushkin's estate is drowning in ruins. There is dirt and dust all around. He turned his house into a dump. The man collected all sorts of rubbish. He tries not to communicate with loved ones and avoids children.

The images of landowners in the poem “Dead Souls” best characterize the state of Russia at that time. Through the described vices, the author tries to direct a person to the true path.

Other interesting essay topics