THE MEANING OF THE TITLE OF THE POEM N.A. NEKRASOV “WHO LIVES WELL IN RUSSIA”

Nekrasov’s entire poem is a worldly gathering that is flaring up and gradually gaining strength. For Nekrasov, it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long path of truth-seeking.

The Prologue sets up the action. Seven peasants argue about “who lives happily and freely in Rus'.” The men do not yet understand that the question of who is happier - the priest, the landowner, the merchant, the official or the tsar - reveals the limitations of their idea of ​​​​happiness, which comes down to material security. A meeting with a priest makes men think about a lot:

Well, here's Popov's vaunted life.

Starting from the chapter “Happy”, a turn is planned in the direction of the search for a happy person. On their own initiative, the “lucky” ones from the lower classes begin to approach the wanderers. Stories are heard - confessions of courtyard people, clergy, soldiers, stonemasons, hunters. Of course, these “lucky ones” are such that the wanderers, seeing the empty bucket, exclaim with bitter irony:

Hey, man's happiness! Leaky with patches, Humpbacked with calluses, Go home!

But at the end of the chapter there is a story about a happy man - Ermil Girin. The story about him begins with a description of his litigation with the merchant Altynnikov. Yermil is conscientious. Let us remember how he paid off the peasants for the debt collected in the market square:

All day long Yermil walked around with his purse open, asking, Whose ruble is it? I didn’t find it.

Throughout his life, Yermil refutes the initial ideas of wanderers about the essence of human happiness. It would seem that he has “everything that is needed for happiness: peace of mind, money, and honor.” But at a critical moment in his life, Yermil sacrifices this “happiness” for the sake of the people’s truth and ends up in prison. Gradually, the ideal of an ascetic, a fighter for the people's interests, is born in the minds of the peasants. In the part “The Landowner,” the wanderers treat the masters with obvious irony. They understand that noble “honor” is worth little.

No, you are not a noble to us, give us the word of a peasant.

Yesterday's "slaves" took on the solution of problems that since ancient times were considered a noble privilege. The nobility saw its historical destiny in caring about the fate of the Fatherland. And then suddenly the men took over this single mission from the nobility and became citizens of Russia:

The landowner, not without bitterness, said: “Put on your hats, sit down, gentlemen!”

In the last part of the poem, a new hero appears: Grisha Dob-rosklonov - a Russian intellectual who knows that people's happiness can only be achieved as a result of a nationwide struggle for the “Unflogged province, Ungutted volost, Izbytkovo village.”

The army is rising - Innumerable, The strength in it will be indestructible!

The fifth chapter of the last part ends with words expressing the ideological pathos of the entire work: “If only our wanderers could be under their own roof, // If only they could know what was happening to Grisha.” These lines seem to answer the question posed in the title of the poem. A happy person in Rus' is one who firmly knows that he must “live for the happiness of his wretched and dark native corner.”

The very title of the poem sets us up for a truly all-Russian review of life, for the fact that this life will be examined truthfully and thoroughly, from top to bottom. It aims to find an answer to the main questions of the time, when the country was going through an era of great changes: what is the source of the people’s troubles, what has really changed in their lives, and what has remained the same, what needs to be done so that the people can truly “live well” in Russia and who can claim the title of “lucky”. The process of searching for a happy person turns into a search for happiness for everyone, and numerous meetings with those who claim to be happy make it possible to show the people's idea of ​​happiness, which is clarified, specified and at the same time enriched, acquiring a moral and philosophical meaning. Therefore, the title of the poem aims not only at the socio-historical basis of its ideological content, but is also associated with certain unchanging foundations of spiritual existence, moral values ​​developed by the people over many centuries. The title of the poem is also associated with folk epics and fairy tales, where the heroes are looking for truth and happiness, which means it orients the reader to the fact that not only the broadest panorama of the life of Russia in its present, past and future should unfold before him, but also indicates a connection with the deep origins of national life.

Essay on literature on the topic: The meaning of the title of the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'”

Other writings:

1. Nekrasov’s entire poem is a flaring up, gradually gaining strength, worldly gathering. For Nekrasov, it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long path of truth-seeking. The “Prologue” begins the action. Seven peasants argue about “who lives Read More ......
2. The meaning of the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is not clear. After all, the question is: who is happy? – raises others: what is happiness? Who deserves happiness? Where should you look for it? And “The Peasant Woman” does not so much close these questions as it opens them and points them to them. Read More......
3. Disputes about the composition of the work are still ongoing, but most scientists have come to the conclusion that it should be like this: “Prologue. Part One”, “Peasant Woman”, “Last One”, “Feast for the Whole World”. The arguments in favor of this particular arrangement of material are as follows. In the first part Read More......
4. Artistic features of the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'.” Having decided to create a book about the people and for the people, Nekrasov subordinates the entire artistic structure of the work to this goal. The poem contains the real linguistic element of folk speech. Here is the speech of wanderers, seekers of happiness, and rich Read More......
5. Nekrasov’s entire poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is a flaring up worldly gathering that is gradually gaining strength. For Nekrasov, the process itself is important here; it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long path of truth-seeking. Read More......
6. The question of the first “Prologue” deserves special attention. The poem has several prologues: before the chapter “Pop”, before the parts “Peasant Woman” and “Feast for the Whole World”. The first “Prologue” is sharply different from the others. It poses a problem common to the entire poem “To whom Read More ......
7. The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” (1863-1877) is the pinnacle of Nekrasov’s creativity. This is a true encyclopedia of Russian pre-reform and post-reform life, a work grandiose in its breadth of concept, depth of penetration into the psychology of people of various classes of Russia at that time, truthfulness, brightness and diversity of types. Nekrasov devoted a long time to the poem Read More ......
8. The poem by N. A. Nekrasov “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is a broad epic canvas that depicts the consequences of one of the most significant events in the history of Russia - the abolition of serfdom. The peasantry expected liberation, but, having been released without land, they ended up Read More......

Collection of essays: The meaning of the title of N. A. Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'”

Nekrasov’s entire poem is a flaring up, gradually gaining strength, worldly gathering. For Nekrasov, it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long path of truth-seeking.

The Prologue sets up the action. Seven peasants argue about “who lives happily and freely in Russia.” The men do not yet understand that the question of who is happier - the priest, the landowner, the merchant, the official or the tsar - reveals the limitations of their idea of ​​​​happiness, which comes down to material security. A meeting with a priest makes men think about a lot:

Well, here's what you've praised

Popov's life.

Starting from the chapter “Happy”, a turn is planned in the direction of the search for a happy person. On their own initiative, the “lucky” ones from the lower classes begin to approach the wanderers. Stories are heard - confessions of courtyard people, clergy, soldiers, stonemasons, hunters. Of course, these “lucky ones” are such that the wanderers, seeing the empty bucket, exclaim with bitter irony:

Hey, man's happiness!

Leaky with patches,

Humpbacked with calluses,

Go home!

But at the end of the chapter there is a story about a happy man - Ermil Girin. The story about him begins with a description of his litigation with the merchant Altynnikov. Yermil is conscientious. Let us remember how he paid off the peasants for the debt collected in the market square:

All day with my money open

Yermil walked around, asking questions,

Whose ruble? I didn’t find it.

Throughout his life, Yermil refutes the initial ideas of wanderers about the essence of human happiness. It would seem that he has “everything that is needed for happiness: peace of mind, money, and honor.” But at a critical moment in his life, Yermil sacrifices this “happiness” for the sake of the people’s truth and ends up in prison. Gradually, the ideal of an ascetic, a fighter for the people's interests, is born in the minds of the peasants. In the part “The Landowner,” the wanderers treat the masters with obvious irony. They understand that noble “honor” is worth little.

No, you are not noble to us,

Give me your peasant's word.

Yesterday's "slaves" took on the solution of problems that since ancient times were considered a noble privilege. The nobility saw its historical destiny in caring about the fate of the Fatherland. And then suddenly the men took over this single mission from the nobility and became citizens of Russia:

The landowner is not without bitterness

Said: “Put on your hats,

Sit down, gentlemen!

In the last part of the poem, a new hero appears: Grisha Dobrosklonov - a Russian intellectual who knows that people's happiness can only be achieved as a result of a nationwide struggle for the “Unflogged province, Ungutted volost, Izbytkovo village.”

The army rises -

Uncountable,

The strength in her will affect

Indestructible!

The fifth chapter of the last part ends with words expressing the ideological pathos of the entire work: “If only our wanderers could be under their own roof, // If only they could know what was happening to Grisha.” These lines seem to answer the question posed in the title of the poem. A happy person in Rus' is one who firmly knows that he must “live for the happiness of his wretched and dark native corner.”

Nekrasov’s entire poem is a flaring up, gradually gaining strength, worldly gathering. For Nekrasov, it is important that the peasantry not only thought about the meaning of life, but also set out on a difficult and long path of truth-seeking.

The “Prologue” begins the action. Seven

Peasants argue about “who lives happily and freely in Russia.” The men do not yet understand that the question of who is happier - the priest, the landowner, the merchant, the official or the tsar - reveals the limitations of their idea of ​​​​happiness, which comes down to material security. A meeting with a priest makes men think about a lot:

Well, here's what you've praised

Starting from the chapter “Happy”, a turn is planned in the direction of the search for a happy person. On their own initiative, the “lucky” ones from the lower classes begin to approach the wanderers. Stories are heard - confessions of courtyard people, clergy, soldiers, stonemasons,

Hunters. Of course, these “lucky ones” are such that the wanderers, seeing the empty bucket, exclaim with bitter irony:

Hey, man's happiness!

Leaky with patches,

Humpbacked with calluses,

But at the end of the chapter there is a story about a happy man - Ermil Girin. The story about him begins with a description of his litigation with the merchant Altynnikov. Yermil is conscientious. Let us remember how he paid off the peasants for the debt collected in the market square:

All day with my money open

Yermil walked around, asking questions,

Whose ruble? I didn’t find it.

Throughout his life, Yermil refutes the initial ideas of wanderers about the essence of human happiness. It would seem that he has “everything that is needed for happiness: peace of mind, money, and honor.” But at a critical moment in his life, Yermil sacrifices this “happiness” for the sake of the people’s truth and ends up in prison. Gradually, the ideal of an ascetic, a fighter for the people's interests, is born in the minds of the peasants. In the part “The Landowner,” the wanderers treat the masters with obvious irony. They understand that noble “honor” is worth little.

No, you are not noble to us,

Give me your peasant's word.

Yesterday’s “slaves” took up the task of solving problems that since ancient times were considered a noble privilege. The nobility saw its historical destiny in caring about the fate of the Fatherland. And then suddenly the men took over this single mission from the nobility and became citizens of Russia:

The landowner is not without bitterness

Said: “Put on your hats,

In the last part of the poem, a new hero appears: Grisha Dobrosklonov - a Russian intellectual who knows that people's happiness can only be achieved as a result of a nationwide struggle for the “Unflogged province, Ungutted volost, Izbytkovo village.”

The strength in her will affect

The fifth chapter of the last part ends with words expressing the ideological pathos of the entire work: “Our wanderers would be under their own roof, If only they could know what was happening to Grisha.” These lines seem to answer the question posed in the title of the poem. A happy person in Rus' is one who firmly knows that he must “live for the happiness of his wretched and dark native corner.”

Essays on topics:

1. PART I The prologue tells about the events that occur in the poem itself. That is, about how seven peasants...
2. In the poem “Who Lives Well in Rus',” Nekrasov, as if on behalf of millions of peasants, acted as an angry denouncer of the socio-political system of Russia and...
3. The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is the pinnacle work of N. A. Nekrasov’s creativity. He nurtured the idea of ​​this work for a long time, fourteen...
4. In his poem N. A. Nekrasov creates images of “new people” who emerged from the people’s environment and became active fighters for the good...

The very title of the poem sets us up for a truly all-Russian review of life, for the fact that this life will be examined truthfully and thoroughly, from top to bottom. It aims to find an answer to the main questions of the time, when the country was going through an era of great changes: what is the source of the people’s troubles, what has really changed in their lives, and what has remained the same, what needs to be done so that the people can truly “live well” in Russia and who can claim the title of “lucky”. The process of searching for a happy person turns into a search for happiness

For everyone, and numerous meetings with those who claim to be happy make it possible to show the people's idea of ​​happiness, which is clarified, specified and at the same time enriched, acquiring a moral and philosophical meaning. Therefore, the title of the poem aims not only at the socio-historical basis of its ideological content, but is also associated with certain unchanging foundations of spiritual existence, moral values ​​developed by the people over many centuries. The title of the poem is also associated with folk epics and fairy tales, where the heroes are looking for truth and happiness, which means it orients the reader to the fact that not only the broadest panorama of the life of Russia in its present, past and future should unfold before him, but also indicates a connection with the deep origins of national life.

1. Humor plays a special role in the poetics of the work. With the help of various shades of humor, the author and heroes of the poem express their superiority over the serf owners. When in the “Prologue” the author gently chuckles at the seven disputants,...
2. The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” became one of the central ones in the work of N. A. Nekrasov. The time when he worked on the poem was a time of great change. The passions of the representatives were in full swing in society...
3. More complex and at the same time somehow simpler than Obolt-Obolduev and Prince Utyatin, the Shalashnikovs - father and son, as well as their manager, the German Vogel, spoke to the men. Wanderers and reader...
4. The changes that occur with the seven men in the process of their search are extremely important for understanding the author's intention, the central idea of ​​the entire work. Only wanderers are given in the course of gradual changes, in evolution (the rest of the active...
5. I have never seen such a corner, Where would your sower and guardian be, Where would the Russian peasant not groan! N. A. Nekrasov Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov was surprisingly sensitive and attentive to people...
6. The only thing God forgot to change was the harsh lot of the peasant woman. N. A. Nekrasov A multifaceted creative exploration of the depths of folk life led Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov to the creation of perhaps the most amazing work - “Frost,...
7. The people's share, their happiness, light and freedom, first of all! N. A. Nekrasov. The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” was written by the great Russian poet Nikolai Alekseevich Nekrasov. There is something in this work...
8. The result of life and creative path. This result is the poem by N. A. Nekrasov “Who Lives Well in Rus',” on which the author worked for about 20 years. The globality of the issue required the poet to scale...
9. Peasants are defenseless victims of landowners. They suffer many injustices, but they have no one to complain to. “God is high, the king is far away,” says old man Savely to Matryona Timofeevna. The king, who held state power in his hands,...
10. Without in any way detracting from the social significance of Nekrasov’s poems, which introduced “sobbing sounds” into Russian lyrics and made us shudder at the sight of people’s suffering, we cannot help but say something about the works where the poet explores the subtle...
11. In the not so distant past, the Russian Empire was full of noble estates and the landowners Nekrasov lived there. In post-reform Russia, the landowners retained a dominant position, and the peasants, as in the pre-reform era, suffered under...
12. Nekrasov devoted his odes to life to working on a poem, which he called his “favorite brainchild.” “I decided,” said Nekrasov, “to present in a coherent story everything that I know about the people, everything that ...
13. 1. Seven wanderers looking for a happy man. 2. Ermil Girin. 3. “Serf Woman” Matryona Timofeevna. 4. Grigory Dobrosklonov. The theme of searching for a happy lot and “mother truth” occupies a significant place in the folklore tradition, on...
14. Perhaps not a single writer or poet has ignored a woman in his work. Attractive images of a lover, a mother, a mysterious stranger adorn the pages of domestic and foreign authors, being a subject of admiration, a source of inspiration,...
15. The poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” is built on the basis of a strict and harmonious compositional plan. In the prologue of the poem, a broad epic picture emerges in general outlines. In it, as if in focus, highlighted...
16. N. A. Nekrasov decided to write “an epic of peasant life.” But when the work was published, it became clear that it reflected not only the life of the peasantry. This poem has become a real encyclopedia of all Russian...
17. 1. The main meaning of the poem. 2. Peasantry in the poem. 3. The hard lot and simple happiness of the Russian people. 4. Matryona Timofeevna as a symbol of the Russian woman. 5. Grisha Good clones - the ideal of the intelligentsia...N. A. Nekrasov rented the magazine “Otechestvennye zapiski” and invited M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin as a co-editor. “Domestic Notes” under the leadership of Nekrasov became the same combat magazine as “Sovremennik”, they followed...