A composition based on Dubrovsky's novel defense of honor and independence. Composition based on the novel "Dubrovsky" by A. Pushkin: protection of the human person What is the protection of the human person

At all times, there were people who resigned themselves to the strength and inevitability of circumstances and were ready to accept fate with their heads down as it is. But at all times there have been people who are ready to fight for their happiness, people who do not want to endure injustice, people who have nothing to lose. We can meet such people on the pages of the novel by A.S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky".
This piece is deep and interesting. It impressed me with its idea, plot twists, sad ending, heroes. Kirilla Petrovich Troekurov, Vladimir Dubrovsky, Masha Troekurova - all these are strong and outstanding personalities. But the difference between them is that Troekurov was by nature a good person, he was connected by good comradely relations with the poor landowner Dubrovsky, he was characterized by human impulses, but at the same time he was a despot and tyrant. Troekurov is a typical serf-owner, in whom a sense of his own superiority and permissiveness, depravity and ignorance is developed to the limit. Whereas Dubrovsky and Masha are noble, sincere, pure and honest natures.
The main problem of the novel is the problem of protecting human dignity. But, one way or another, she is associated with all the characters in the work. First of all, this problem concerns the Dubrovsky family, which Troekurov deprived not only of the family estate, but also encroached on their noble honor and dignity.
Andrei Gavrilovich was confident that he was right, cared little about the court case that Troekurov had started against him, and therefore could not defend his rights. Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky could not stand the unequal battle with a stronger rival and died. Then Dubrovsky Jr. had to defend his own honor. By chance, he became the head of the peasant movement in order to "administer his own judgment." But from the very beginning he did not agree with the methods of struggle against the landlords. His pure and sincere nature did not allow him to become a real thug - cruel and merciless. He was just and merciful, so Vladimir did not lead the peasants for long. The peasant revolt was spontaneous, their actions were often contradictory, so they submitted to Dubrovsky's order, stopped the armed uprising and dispersed. “… Terrible visits, fires and robberies have stopped. The roads are now clear. "
But why does Vladimir not touch the property of his offender, the richest landowner in the district, Troekurov? As it turned out, Dubrovsky fell in love with Kirill Petrovich's daughter, Masha, and forgave his blood enemy for her sake. Masha also fell in love with Vladimir. But these heroes could not be together - Kirill Petrovich forcibly gave his daughter in marriage to the old Count Vereisky. Vladimir did not manage to save his beloved from marriage with an unloved person.
With such a plot twist, a sad ending, it seems to me, A.S. Pushkin shows that a person in Russia is defenseless against evil and injustice. Neither law nor society can protect him. He can only count on his own strength.
Therefore, I understand Vladimir Dubrovsky, who became a robber. What else could he do? Not finding protection from the law, he also decided to live by unwritten rules - the rules of strength and cruelty. But his noble, pure and sincere nature still limited the hero in this, made him a “noble robber”.

At all times, there were people who resigned themselves to the strength and inevitability of circumstances and were ready to accept fate with their heads down as it is. But at all times there have been people who are ready to fight for their happiness, people who do not want to endure injustice, people who have nothing to lose. We can meet such people on the pages of the novel by A.S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky".

This piece is deep and interesting. It impressed me with its idea, plot twists, sad ending, heroes. Kirilla Petrovich Troekurov, Vladimir Dubrovsky, Masha Troekurova - all these are strong and outstanding personalities. But the difference between them is that Troekurov was by nature a good person, he was connected by good comradely relations with the poor landowner Dubrovsky, he was characterized by human impulses, but at the same time he was a despot and tyrant. Troekurov is a typical serf-owner, in whom a sense of his own superiority and permissiveness, depravity and ignorance is developed to the limit. Whereas Dubrovsky and Masha are noble, sincere, pure and honest natures.

The main problem of the novel is the problem of protecting human dignity. But, one way or another, she is associated with all the characters in the work. First of all, this problem concerns the Dubrovsky family, which Troekurov deprived not only of the family estate, but also encroached on their noble honor and dignity.

Andrei Gavrilovich was confident that he was right, cared little about the court case that Troekurov had started against him, and therefore could not defend his rights. Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky could not stand the unequal battle with a stronger rival and died. Then Dubrovsky Jr. had to defend his own honor. By chance, he became the head of the peasant movement in order to "administer his own judgment." But from the very beginning he did not agree with the methods of struggle against the landlords. His pure and sincere nature did not allow him to become a real thug - cruel and merciless. He was just and merciful, so Vladimir did not lead the peasants for long. The peasant revolt was spontaneous, their actions were often contradictory, so they submitted to Dubrovsky's order, stopped the armed uprising and dispersed. “… Terrible visits, fires and robberies have stopped. The roads are now clear. "

But why does Vladimir not touch the property of his offender, the richest landowner in the district, Troekurov? As it turned out, Dubrovsky fell in love with Kirill Petrovich's daughter, Masha, and forgave his blood enemy for her sake. Masha also fell in love with Vladimir. But these heroes could not be together - Kirill Petrovich forcibly gave his daughter in marriage to the old Count Vereisky. Vladimir did not manage to save his beloved from marriage with an unloved person.

With such a plot twist, a sad ending, it seems to me, A.S. Pushkin shows that a person in Russia is defenseless against evil and injustice. Neither law nor society can protect him. He can only count on his own strength.

Therefore, I understand Vladimir Dubrovsky, who became a robber. What else could he do? Not finding protection from the law, he also decided to live by unwritten rules - the rules of strength and cruelty. But his noble, pure and sincere nature still limited the hero in this, made him a “noble robber”.

"Dubrovsky" is a work based on a case that was quite typical for the legal proceedings of that time. And the adventure motives were inspired by Shiller's "Robbers" to Pushkin. But the essay based on the novel "Dubrovsky" touches primarily on topics such as revenge and forgiveness, justice and equality.

Nashchokin's story

Situations in which more influential and wealthy landowners, using their opportunities, oppressed their poor neighbors in every possible way, often developed in Pushkin's times. In the judicial sphere, arbitrariness reigned. The landowner could take away from the poorer even the property that was due to him by law. A similar incident happened to a certain Ostrovsky.

As a result of dishonest litigation, he lost everything he had. However, he did not give up, did not give up. He organized a gang of robbers, whose members sought justice in their own way. This story was told to Pushkin by his friend Nashchokin. She also formed the basis of the work. An essay based on the novel "Dubrovsky" may have the title "Condemnation of arbitrariness."

Honor and dishonor

This motive is the main one. The defense of the human personality in the novel "Dubrovsky" is an essay that should begin with the depiction of a disgusting picture of landlord life, where despotism is combined with sycophancy, indifference to human suffering - with venality. And against this background, several images stand out clearly, and first of all, the main character, whose name the work is named after.

Inborn nobility or a long stay away from home played a role in the formation of the personality of Dubrovsky Jr. Even Vladimir's father, one of the best representatives of the nobility, possesses these negative qualities. Not surprising, because such a worldview has been passed down from generation to generation. In order to think differently, one of the representatives of this social stratum of society needs to be cut off from this world, to form his views away from it.

Oddly enough, quite often the reverse side of the medal of despotism is servility and servility. A person who is able to humiliate another is ready for his own humiliation. Of course, if it will be carried out by the one who is higher in social and material terms.

Vladimir Dubrovsky was repulsive to such a way of thinking. He could always defend his honor. But he considered it beneath his dignity to humiliate another person, whoever he was: a nobleman, an official, a peasant. Dubrovsky is an example of aristocracy, an example of a Russian nobleman. Unfortunately, there were only a few of them. Perhaps that is why this social stratum was destroyed.

Troekurov

The composition based on the novel "Dubrovsky" cannot get around the image of a tyrant landowner. After all, his permissiveness and entailed the key events of the novel.

There are always many guests in the Troekurov house. But not all of them are here of their own free will. Troekurov treats them almost the same as his serfs. This person is spoiled, perverted and incredibly vain. However, it is worth giving him his due - in his soul there is something, if not noble, then capable of appreciating and respecting nobility. It was not for nothing that for a long time the only person to whom he treated with respect was his neighbor from Kistenevka. An essay based on the novel "Dubrovsky" can reveal the complex inner world of this Russian master, in whose outrage, first of all, his sycophants were guilty. There would be more landowners like Andrei Dubrovsky in the district, and Troyekurov would not be able to realize all his vain plans. Consequently, he would not be corrupted.

Masha Troekurova

Since Vladimir returned to his home and learned about the insult inflicted on his father by the neighbor's master, a desire to take revenge has settled in his soul. The author does not tell how he hatched his plan. Pushkin created this work in a clear realistic spirit, without unnecessary descriptions and digressions. But a few episodes are enough, and the reader becomes clear about the spiritual world in which Dubrovsky was after the death of his father.

An essay on literature based on the novel "Dubrovsky" can be devoted to the lyrical motive of this work. The romantic theme here is closely related to revenge and the desire to defend one's honor. No matter how strong they were, after meeting with Masha, Vladimir refuses them. He does not want to do evil to Troyekurov anymore.

Other characters

A full essay can be devoted to the answer to the question of why Vladimir refused to take revenge. The heroes of the novel "Dubrovsky" represent a rather complex system of images. In the center of the story is the son of the Kistenevsky master. Opposing it creates a noble society. But there is also a background - Kistenev's serfs and Troyekurov's peasants. However, setting himself the goal of revenge and showing a certain toughness, Dubrovsky treats an ordinary peasant with unusual respect for a landowner. This speaks not of love for the working people, but of education and nobility.

Reply left the guest

The inner world turns out to be more imperious for the hero than the laws of society, desires are more imperative than the consciousness of necessity. This is the essence of the romantic hero. Pushkin retains it in the novel, where he wants to realistically investigate the reasons for the defeat of the romantic personality before the force of circumstances. Speaking of Vladimir Dubrovsky as a hero endowed with romantic impulses, we mean precisely the direct romanticism of his behavior and feelings, and not a complete romantic system of worldview, which he doesn't. He often does not fully realize his conflict with reality. The process of realizing oneself and reality is not shown in Dubrovsky, as, say, it is done in Lermontov's A Hero of Our Time. Pushkin's interest in the problem of the relationship between romantic impulses and the laws of society was created by the post-December situation, when the bitterness of the experience of the heroes on December 14, 1825 required clarification of the causes of the catastrophe. V. Klyuchevsky pointed out the connection of the romantic hero Vladimir Dubrovsky with the inner world and impulses of the Decembrists: the pole of the century and at the same time its negation. One can already see the features of a gentle, noble, romantically protesting and bitterly deceived by fate Aleksandrovtsi, a member of the Union of Prosperity ”. It is significant that this idea belongs to a historian who was able to see in Pushkin's novel a reaction to the social situation of the era. Pushkin recognized the idea of ​​individual independence as one of the conditions for social progress. In "Refutation to Critics" he wrote about the historical significance of the idea of ​​honor, about the ancient nobility - the bearer of nobility and independence: “Whatever the way of my thoughts, I never shared with anyone the democratic hatred of the nobility. It always seemed to me a necessary and natural estate of a great educated people. Looking around me and reading our old chronicles, I regretted seeing how the ancient noble families were destroyed, how the rest fell and disappear ... and how the name of a nobleman, hour by hour more humiliated, finally became a parable and a mockery of the commoners who came out as nobles , and even idle jokes! " These notes by Pushkin, written in Boldino in 1830, are very close to the feelings that inspired the old Dubrovsky. But for Pushkin "there are dignities above the nobility of the family, namely: personal dignity." The idea of ​​honor and the protection of the rights of the human person lay at the basis of Pushkin's humanistic worldview. Fidelity to this idea determined both poetry and personal behavior. No wonder Lermontov will call the deceased Pushkin "a slave of honor." Vladimir Dubrovsky is presented as a noble defender of this idea; even having become a robber, he remains a servant of justice. This is how V. Dubrovsky appears in Globova's story. He is endowed with excellent qualities of determination, courage, self-control. Falling into the situation of Hamlet, Vladimir Dubrovsky also does not avenge his father. For Hamlet, "murder is disgusting in itself," the humanistic outlook does not allow the Danish prince to turn into a blind instrument of revenge. To shed blood, Hamlet needs grandiose grounds and the immediacy of indignation. He cannot commit primitive revenge, for he is endowed with love for humanity and the consciousness of the impossibility of defiling himself with a crime. Vladimir Dubrovsky is bound in his action by his love for Masha Troekurova. This is what the Pushkin hero is usually accused of, just as Hamlet was accused of reflection and passivity for many centuries. However, for all the equal size of these heroes, their refusal to revenge is explained by high reasons. For Hamlet, revenge for his father develops into a struggle to restore humanity to the world. Reflection of Hamlet led him to abandon low motives for action. Discarding them, Hamlet goes to a tragic victory. With Dubrovsky, revenge for his father involuntarily develops into a social protest. He becomes the defender of the offended. But Vladimir Dubrovsky does not overcome the low motives of action, like Hamlet, but refuses revenge for the sake of love. Urging Masha not to fear the robber in him, Vladimir says: “It's all over. I told him

At all times, there were people who resigned themselves to the strength and inevitability of circumstances and were ready to accept fate with their heads down as it is. But at all times there have been people who are ready to fight for their happiness, people who do not want to endure injustice, people who have nothing to lose. We can meet such people on the pages of the novel by A.S. Pushkin "Dubrovsky".

This piece is deep and interesting. It impressed me with its idea, plot twists, sad ending, heroes. Kirilla Petrovich Troekurov, Vladimir Dubrovsky, Masha Troekurova - all these are strong and outstanding personalities. But the difference between them is that Troekurov was by nature a good person, he was connected by good comradely relations with the poor landowner Dubrovsky, he was characterized by human impulses, but at the same time he was a despot and tyrant. Troekurov is a typical serf-owner, in whom a sense of his own superiority and permissiveness, depravity and ignorance is developed to the limit. Whereas Dubrovsky and Masha are noble, sincere, pure and honest natures.

The main problem of the novel is the problem of protecting human dignity. But, one way or another, she is associated with all the characters in the work. First of all, this problem concerns the Dubrovsky family, which Troekurov deprived not only of the family estate, but also encroached on their noble honor and dignity.

Andrei Gavrilovich was confident that he was right, cared little about the court case that Troekurov had started against him, and therefore could not defend his rights. Andrei Gavrilovich Dubrovsky could not stand the unequal battle with a stronger rival and died. Then Dubrovsky Jr. had to defend his own honor. By chance, he became the head of the peasant movement in order to "administer his own judgment." But from the very beginning he did not agree with the methods of struggle against the landlords. His pure and sincere nature did not allow him to become a real thug - cruel and merciless. He was just and merciful, so Vladimir did not lead the peasants for long. The peasant revolt was spontaneous, their actions were often contradictory, so they submitted to Dubrovsky's order, stopped the armed uprising and dispersed. “… Terrible visits, fires and robberies have stopped. The roads are now clear. "

But why does Vladimir not touch the property of his offender, the richest landowner in the district, Troekurov? As it turned out, Dubrovsky fell in love with Kirill Petrovich's daughter, Masha, and forgave his blood enemy for her sake. Masha also fell in love with Vladimir. But these heroes could not be together - Kirill Petrovich forcibly gave his daughter in marriage to the old Count Vereisky. Vladimir did not manage to save his beloved from marriage with an unloved person.

With such a plot twist, a sad ending, it seems to me, A.S. Pushkin shows that a person in Russia is defenseless against evil and injustice. Neither law nor society can protect him. He can only count on his own strength.

Therefore, I understand Vladimir Dubrovsky, who became a robber. What else could he do? Not finding protection from the law, he also decided to live by unwritten rules - the rules of strength and cruelty. But his noble, pure and sincere nature still limited the hero in this, made him a “noble robber”.