In what era did A.S. live? Griboyedov? Eight striking facts from the life of Alexander Griboyedov What talents did Griboyedov have?

The phenomenon is the talent of A.S. Griboyedov. Life path and character of A.S. Griboyedov
This man's talent was truly phenomenal. His knowledge was enormous and multifaceted, he learned many languages, was a good officer, a capable musician, an outstanding diplomat with the makings of a major politician.
But despite all this, few would have remembered him if not for the comedy “Woe from Wit,” which put Griboyedov on a par with the greatest Russian writers.
There are many mysteries and gaps in Griboyedov’s biography, especially regarding childhood and youth. Neither the year of his birth (1794 or 1795; although the day is precisely known - January 4), nor the year of admission to the university noble boarding school is known with certainty. The widely spread version, according to which Griboedov graduated from three faculties of Moscow University and only because of the War of 1812 did not receive a doctorate, is not supported by documents.
One thing is certain: in 1806 he entered the Faculty of Literature, and in 1808 he graduated from it. If Griboedov was really born in 1795, as most biographers believe, he was then 13 years old.
More reliable information about Griboyedov’s life, starting in 1812. During the invasion of Napoleon, Alexander Sergeevich, like many Moscow nobles, enlisted as an officer in the militia. But he never had the chance to take part in battles: the regiment was in the rear.
After the war, the future writer served in Belarus. Griboyedov spent his youth stormy. He called himself and his fellow soldiers, the Begichev brothers, “stepsons of common sense” - so unbridled were their pranks.
There is a known case when Griboyedov once sat down at the organ during a service in a Catholic church. At first he played sacred music for a long time and with inspiration, and then suddenly switched to Russian dance music.
Griboedov also played pranks and mischief in St. Petersburg, where he moved in 1816 (he spent a year in retirement, and then became an official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). But by this time he had already begun to study literature seriously. From Belarus Griboedov brought the comedy (translated from French) “The Young Spouses”.
It was staged in the capital not without success. Then Griboyedov participated as a co-author in writing several more plays. The stage became his real passion. He became friends with the director of the St. Petersburg theater, playwright Shakhovsky, and especially close with the talented poet and theater expert Pavel Katenin.
In collaboration with Katenin, Griboyedov wrote the best of his early works - the comedy in prose "Student" (1817). During Griboedov’s lifetime, it did not appear either on stage or in print. Perhaps the attacks on literary opponents (Zhukovsky, Batyushkov, Karamzin), whose poems were parodied in the play, seemed indecent to the censors.
No less than the author's fame, Griboedov was seduced and attracted by the behind-the-scenes life of the theater, an indispensable part of which were affairs with actresses. One of these stories ended tragically.
Two friends of Griboyedov, revelers Sheremetev and Zavadovsky, competed over the ballerina Istomina. The well-known duelist in the city, Alexander Yakubovich (the future Decembrist), fanned the quarrel, and accused Griboedov of ignoble behavior. Sheremetev had to fight with Zavadovsky, Yakubovich - with Griboedov.
Both duels were to take place on the same day. But while after the first duel they were providing assistance to the mortally wounded Sheremetev, time had passed. The next day, Yakubovich was arrested as the instigator and exiled to the Caucasus. Griboyedov was not punished, but public opinion considered him guilty of Sheremetev’s death. The authorities decided to remove from St. Petersburg the official “involved in history.”
Griboyedov was offered to take the place of secretary of the Russian mission either in the United States of America or in Persia. He chose the latter, and it sealed his fate.
On the way to Persia, Griboedov stayed in Tiflis for almost a year. There the postponed duel with Yakubovich took place. Griboyedov was wounded in the arm - for him, as a musician, this was very sensitive.
Griboyedov served in Persia for three years, then moved as a “diplomatic official” to the staff of the Chief Administrator of Georgia, General A.P. Ermolov. Service in Tiflis under this extraordinary man gave him a lot.
Griboyedov spent 1823-1824 on vacation in Moscow, in the village of the Begichevs, in St. Petersburg. His new work - the comedy "Woe from Wit" - created a sensation.
The comedy was conceived back in Persia, started in Tiflis, and finished in the village of the Begichevs. The author read the play in many literary salons. But he failed to publish or stage “Woe from Wit.”
It’s unlikely that the comedy was skipped because of its political urgency: there are not many places in “Woe from Wit” that are dubious in this regard; they would not be difficult to remove or soften. But the play had a flavor of scandal: many Muscovites recognized themselves in its characters (usually mistakenly). It was the censorship who wanted to prevent the scandal. The authorities even banned a performance that theater school students wanted to present in a small circle.
In the almanac “Russian Waist for 1825” they published only the second half of the first act and the entire third. The full text was distributed in thousands of handwritten copies.
In January 1826, after the Decembrist uprising, Griboyedov was arrested on suspicion of involvement in a conspiracy. After some time, he was not only released, but also received another rank, as well as an allowance in the amount of an annual salary.
There really was no serious evidence against him, and even now there is no documentary evidence that the writer somehow participated in the activities of secret societies.
On the contrary, he is credited with a disparaging description of the conspiracy: “One hundred warrant officers want to turn Russia over!” But, perhaps, Griboyedov owes his acquittal to the intercession of a relative - General I. F. Paskevich, a favorite of Nicholas I.
In 1828, Griboyedov was appointed envoy plenipotentiary to Persia. On the way, in Tiflis, he fell passionately in love with Princess Nina Chavchavadze, the daughter of his old friend, the Georgian poet Alexander Chavchavadze, and married her.
The marital happiness was immeasurable, but it soon ended. A month after the wedding, the young couple left for Persia. Nina stopped in border Tabriz, and Griboyedov moved further - to the capital of Persia, Tehran.
Just a month later, tragedy unfolded there. On January 30, 1829, the embassy was destroyed, and everyone who was in it was killed. Only one person was saved.
Griboyedov was buried in his beloved Tiflis, in the monastery of St. David on Mount Mtatsminda. At his grave, the widow erected a monument to him with the inscription: “Your mind and deeds are immortal in Russian memory, but why did my love survive you?”
The life of A. S. Griboyedov is interesting and instructive. From his biography we learn what representatives of the advanced educated nobility were like and how they behaved.

There is still much that is unclear in the biography of A. S. Griboyedov (1795-1829). It is not known exactly when Griboyedov was born - in 1790 or 1795. Now the year of birth is accepted as 1795, other documents give a different, earlier date. For understanding the life and work of Griboyedov, these discrepancies are significant: we cannot say with certainty who Griboyedov is a child prodigy, who graduated from Moscow University at the age of 13 with a candidate’s degree, or a normally developed person who, at a fairly mature age for those times, completed his only work. There is just as much vagueness in the coverage of other places in the playwright’s biography.

Origin and early talent. A. S. Griboedov was born into an old noble family of retired Second Major Sergei Ivanovich Griboyedov, who married his namesake Nastasya Fedorovna Griboyedova. The future playwright received his initial education at home under the guidance of teachers from Moscow University. In 1803 he entered the Moscow University Noble Boarding School, in 1806 he became a student in the literature department of Moscow University, from which he graduated with a candidate's degree in 1808. By this time, Griboyedov had mastered the main European languages ​​and knew ancient languages.

Later he studied oriental languages. In addition to his ability for languages, Griboedov had numerous talents: he successfully studied philosophy, archeology, politics (he attended lectures at the ethical and political department of the university), composed music (two of his waltzes are known) and improvised on the piano.

Circle of acquaintances. The gift of writing manifested itself early in him. At the university, he wrote the comedy “Dmitry Dryanskoy” (not preserved), which portrayed the struggle between Russian and German professors in a funny light. Brilliantly educated, sparkling wit, Griboyedov attracted the then freedom-loving officer and civilian youth. He met many future Decembrists (I.D. Yakushkin, N.I. Turgenev, S.P. Trubetskoy, V.F. Raevsky) on the Smolensk estate of his maternal uncle. Subsequently, after leaving the university, he became close to P. Ya. Chaadaev, P. I. Pestel, P. A. Katenin, P. A. Vyazemsky, A. A. Shakhovsky, A. A. Bestuzhev, V. K. Kuchelbecker , A.S. Pushkin, V.F. Odoevsky, F.V. Bulgarin and other famous people, became friends with many of them.

The Griboedov House on Novinsky Boulevard in Moscow (far left).
Lithograph from the beginning of the 19th century.

During the Patriotic War of 1812, Griboyedov voluntarily enlisted in the Moscow Hussar Regiment (cornet), but did not participate in battles. After the war, he served as an adjutant under General A.S. Kologrivov, whose nephews D.N. and S.N. Begichev became his friends.

A word about Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov.

You are starting to study the biography of A.S. Griboedova. The resources below will help you answer the following questions:

1. In what era did A.S. live? Griboyedov?
2. What kind of education and upbringing did A.S. receive? Griboyedov?
3. In what historical events of that era did A.S. take part? Griboyedov?
4. What events, people and things are connected with the death of Griboyedov?

To prepare for the test, I advise you to complete the following tasks:

• compile for yourself a chronological certificate of A.S.’s education. Griboedova:

• draw up a certificate of military and civil service of A.S. Griboedova

What struck you most about the personality and life path of A.S. Griboedova? Write an essay on this topic (complete the task below).

A.S. Griboedov is a universal genius.

A.S. Griboyedov is called a universal genius. When you read the materials below, you will understand why.
Answer the questions:

• What other talents, besides literary ones, did A.S. have? Griboyedov?
• What is A.S. famous for? Griboyedov as a diplomat?

You can learn more about A.S. Griboyedov

Zriddle "Woe from Wit". Features of a dramatic work

The new work, “Woe from Wit,” was unlike previous dramatic works. How it was different and how the writer’s contemporaries reacted to it, you will learn from this lesson.

Lesson Plan

The idea of ​​a comedy.

The canons of classicism and the comedy “Woe from Wit”. Reviews from contemporaries and critics.

Famous directors about "Woe from Wit".

Control testing.

You will learn about what caused the birth of the famous comedy “Woe from Wit” from the information below. Think about the question, what prompted A.S. Griboyedov the plot of the comedy: fantasy, stories of contemporaries, personal experience. Try to argue your point of view. You may need materials from the previous lesson for this.

The canons of classicism and the comedy "Woe from Wit". Reviews from contemporaries and critics

Woe from Wit" with its appearance called into question the need to adhere to the canons of classicism.
Below are materials on this topic. Read carefully the article by I.A. Goncharov “A Million Torments.”

It is there that you will find answers to the following questions.

1. Classicism is characterized by the following canons: unity of place, unity of time, unity of action (if a comedy begins with a love affair, then only this line should develop and find its outcome in the end), unity of style (only high or only low), a clear division of heroes into positive and negative, idealization of positive characters, long monologues of the main character. What canons are observed by A.S. Griboyedov in comedy, and which ones are violated?
2. What reaction did the writer’s violation of the norms of classicism cause?
3. What role did it play, according to I.A. Goncharova, the writer’s violation of the norms of classicism?

Famous directors about "Woe from Wit"

“Woe from Wit,” banned during the author’s lifetime, found its stage life later. The play was not perceived by either the directors or the audience as archaic.

Famous directors V.E. Meyerhold and K.S. Stanislavsky is the leader of two completely different directions in theatrical art in their approaches. Each of them had their own special considerations regarding the production of the comedy "Woe from Wit". Whose opinion is closer to you, and what instructions would you give to a modern director for staging a comedy??

Control testing

Russian criticism about A.S. Griboyedov. Ideas of Decembrism in comedy

With this topic we complete the study of the work of A.S. Griboedova. His comedy “Woe from Wit” was interesting to Russian critics not only because of the conflict, which is unlikely to ever lose its relevance, but also as a historical work that reflected the era of the Decembrists.

Lesson Plan

The era of A.S. Griboyedov - the era of the Decembrists

True talent usually cannot limit itself to just one field of science or art. As you know, it must manifest itself “in everything.” There are many examples confirming this fact. They even created a special term for such individuals. They are called polymaths. This review is a story about people who have earned the epithet “great” in history and about those talents that remained “behind the scenes” of their main activities.

Mikhail Lomonosov

Usually, when talking about numerous talents, they cite the example of Leonardo da Vinci, who, in addition to artistic gifts, had the ability to research and invent. However, Russia can boast of an equally gifted person. Enumerating all the talents of Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov will also take a lot of time: encyclopedist, physicist and chemist, founder of scientific navigation, instrument maker, geographer, metallurgist, geologist, and also a poet, artist, historian, philologist and genealogist, educator and polyglot. Moreover, in all these areas he achieved impressive success and left behind a rich legacy.

There is another talent of his that is not often mentioned. It is known that while studying abroad at the University of Marburg, the young student perfectly mastered the art of fencing and often put it into practice. So Lomonosov can rightfully be called a very versatile person.

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

The great composer was generally a very enthusiastic person. Even as a child, if he liked some activity, he could devote himself to it, forgetting about everything in the world. This is what happened, for example... with mathematics. Little Wolfgang was educated at home, and when he discovered the beauty of precise mathematical laws, he was fascinated by them no less than by music. There are memories that the walls and floor in his room during this “mathematical” period were completely covered with formulas. Later, with no less zeal, he became interested in dancing.

His contemporaries considered him an excellent dancer. He played skittles skillfully and loved billiards; he even had a huge billiard table at home. In addition, he taught almost his entire adult life and was a very talented teacher. True, he himself grumbled about this activity, since he did not like to waste time and go to the students’ houses.

Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov

Everyone remembers that this great writer and playwright served as a diplomat, but few people know the fact that he was also a very talented pianist and composer. Unfortunately, only a few small plays have reached us from his works. One of them, written for piano, is considered the first Russian waltz. In addition, this gifted man was, by modern standards, a real polyglot, and his talent for languages ​​manifested itself from early childhood - already at the age of six he was fluent in three foreign languages, and a few years later - six. In addition to the main European languages, he knew Latin and ancient Greek.

Benjamin Franklin

This man, known throughout the world thanks to his portrait on the $100 bill, can rightfully be called the American Leonardo. In addition to his diplomatic work and political career, he is known as a brilliant inventor, writer, journalist and publisher. As a scientist, he studied electricity; by the way, the designation of charges “+” and “-”, known to everyone since childhood, was invented by him. At the same time, he developed a project for a useful practical device - a lightning rod. In addition, Franklin is the author of a rocking chair (a patent has been issued for this design), a special “Pennsylvania fireplace,” bifocal glasses and an electric motor. By the way, he became the first American member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

In addition to science and politics, he considered printing to be one of his main works. How did Franklin manage all this? – At the same time, he invented his own system of organizing time, thus becoming one of the founders of time management, which is very relevant today.

Alexander Porfirievich Borodin

The author of the famous opera “Prince Igor” was probably the only chemist musician in the world. Moreover, it is difficult to even compare and say which of these specialties should be called first. His achievements in chemistry and medicine were no less important than the creation of the epic symphonic style in music.

Both talents literally tore Borodin apart from childhood: at the age of 9 he was already playing several musical instruments and created his first piece of music, and at 10 he became interested in chemistry and almost burned down the whole house, since one of his first creations in this area there were homemade fireworks. So he remained in the memory of posterity as a man with two equal talents - an academician, a professor of medicine, one of the founders of the Russian Chemical Society and at the same time - a member of the “Mighty Handful”.

Sergei Sergeevich Prokofiev

There is probably no need to talk about the musical heritage of the great Russian composer. Over the 60 years of his life, he managed to create more than 130 works, which are considered real treasures of world artistic culture. But besides this, he also left behind a literary legacy - stories, a libretto, an autobiography, on which he worked for 15 years. Contemporaries believed that if he had not been a composer, he could well have become a writer. But Sergei Sergeevich also had a third passion - chess.

The composer himself said that “Chess is the music of thought.” In 1909, he drew with Emanuel Lasker, and in 1914, during simultaneous games with Jose Raul Capablanca, Prokofiev won one game and lost two. In order to have time to pay attention to all his hobbies, the composer taught himself strict discipline from childhood and learned to effectively switch from one type of activity to another.

Another of our great compatriots is called the “Russian Leonardo da Vinci” - this is the famous inventor Ivan Kulibin. Find out why.

Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov
1795 – 1829

Griboyedov was born in Moscow into a noble family. His ancestor, Jan Grzybowski, moved from Poland to Russia at the beginning of the 17th century. The surname Griboedov is nothing more than a peculiar translation of the surname Grzhibovsky. Under Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, Fyodor Akimovich Griboedov was a clerk of the rank and one of the five compilers of the Council Code of 1649.

House of Griboyedovs

The writer's father is retired Second Major Sergei Ivanovich Griboedov (1761 -1814). Mother - Anastasia Fedorovna (1768 -1839), maiden name was also Griboedova.

S. N. Griboyedov
(1761 -1814)
poet's father

Anastasia Fedorovna
(1768 -1839)
poet's mother

According to relatives, already in childhood Alexander was very focused and unusually developed. There is information that he was the great-nephew of Alexander Radishchev (the playwright himself carefully hid this). At the age of 6, he was fluent in three foreign languages, and in his youth already six, in particular, fluent English, French, German and Italian. He understood Latin and ancient Greek very well.
In 1803 he was sent to the Moscow University Noble Boarding School; Three years later, Griboedov entered the literature department of Moscow University. In 1808 he received the title of candidate of literary sciences, but did not leave his studies, but entered the moral and political department, and then the physics and mathematics department.

Young A. S. Griboyedov
in Khmelit

There are many mysteries and gaps in Griboyedov’s biography, especially about his childhood and youth. Neither the year of his birth is known for certain (although the day is precisely known - January 4), nor the year of admission to the University Noble Boarding School. The widely spread version, according to which Griboedov graduated from three faculties of Moscow University and only because of the War of 1812 did not receive a doctorate, is not supported by documents. One thing is certain: in 1806 he entered the Faculty of Literature, and in 1808 he graduated from it. If Griboyedov was really born in 1795, as most biographers believe, he was then thirteen years old. In the early years of the 19th century, this was rare, but it did happen. More reliable information about Griboyedov’s life since 1812. During the invasion of Napoleon, Alexander Sergeevich, like many Moscow nobles, enlisted as an officer in the militia. But he did not have the opportunity to participate in battles: the regiment was in the rear. After the war, for several years the future writer served as an adjutant on the territory of what is now Belarus.

Griboyedov spent his youth stormy. He called himself and his fellow soldiers “stepchildren of common sense” - their pranks were so unbridled. There is a known case when Griboyedov once sat down at the organ during a service in a Catholic church. At first he played sacred music for a long time and with inspiration, and then suddenly switched to Russian dance music. Griboyedov also hung out in St. Petersburg, where he moved in 1816 (he spent a year in retirement, and then became an official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). “But he had already begun to study literature seriously,” says V.N. Orlov.

Griboyedov - poet

In the fall in Moscow, Griboedov plunges headlong into literary and theatrical life. He is close with many writers and actors, especially with V.F. Odoevsky and P.A. Vyazemsky. The first of them recalled, talking about himself in the third person: “Music could be one of the reasons for friendly communication between the princes. Odoevsky and Griboyedov. Griboyedov's sister Maria Sergeevna... played the piano excellently, and especially the harp. Music circles were often held in Griboyedov’s house (near Novinsky). Griboyedov himself was an excellent piano player, but moreover, he and Prince. Odoevsky also studied the theory of music as a science, which was very rare at that time; their mutual friends made fun of them then; even in this circle there was a saying: “As soon as Griboyedov and Odoevsky start talking about music, it’s all lost; You won’t understand anything.”
V.F. Odoevsky, together with Kuchelbecker in Moscow, published the almanac Mnemosyne, which, along with the St. Petersburg almanac Polar Star, became a conductor of Decembrist ideas. Griboedov's program poem "David" is published here. This poem stands out against the background of poetic production of the 1820s for its deliberate archaism. Griboedov uses vocabulary that was used only during Trediakovsky’s time, and... creates a typically “Decembrist work.” You can compare the works of Pushkin and Griboyedov. Both poets address the theme of the prophet, but how differently they embody it.

In Pushkin there is only one archaic word “reins”. Everything else is quite perfect, the intonation of the verse is smooth and distinct, each word is linked to the other, the subsequent follows from the previous one. It’s different for Griboyedov. Lexical units seem to be isolated from each other; in any case, semantic “gaps” are felt between individual sentences.

Unglorious among the brethren from childhood,
Father was the youngest,
Shepherd of the parent flock;
And suddenly God gives her strength
My organ was created by my hands,
The psalter was arranged by the fingers
ABOUT! Who's up to the mountain heights
Will he raise sounds to the Lord?

With an almost equal volume of texts, the number of archaisms in Griboyedov exceeds Pushkin’s by almost ten times! It’s as if Griboyedov’s versifying talent is betraying him. What's the matter? This is explained by a number of reasons.
“David” is a very close arrangement in content and even in the number of words of the 151st psalm of King David. Griboedov's poem differs from the psalm in a change in meaning. Griboedov's hero, as already noted, is close in spirit to the inspired characters of Decembrist poetry, rising up to fight for the common good.
The poet was guided by a reader who not only remembered the Bible, but was also able to fill familiar words and images with new meaning from childhood. But simple allusion was not enough for Griboyedov; he wanted to raise modernity to mythological heights.
In Griboyedov’s poems, writes A. V. Desnitsky, “the speech gives the impression of being created anew, the combinations of words are new, despite the fact that the words used are almost “mossy,” therefore, naturally, the reader has more than one shade , not just one understanding of the author’s thoughts, but a certain polysemy, so broad that only after thinking about it, understanding it, the reader will, when reading, pick out from this polysemy what the author wanted to say. Such speech is so unique and original that it becomes the speech of “one person”, “the speech of Griboyedov”... - it was noted very accurately.
Griboedov's contemporaries did not accept his poetry. “Reading his poems makes my cheekbones hurt,” said Ermolov.
In Russian drama, Griboyedov had such predecessors as D. I. Fonvizin, I. A. Krylov, A. A. Shakhovsky. By the beginning of the 19th century, a type of poetic comedy had already developed in Russia, the driving force of which was, first of all, a love affair, but at the same time social problems were solved, or at least posed.

Attempts to translate works from French

At the beginning of his creative career, Griboyedov gravitated towards light, so-called “secular” comedy, far from exposing social evil. From his duty stations he brought the comedy (translated from French) “The Young Spouses” (1815).
The playwright's first experience was a translation and adaptation from French, which was widely practiced at that time. Creuset de Lessard's three-act comedy A Family Secret (1809) was turned by the translator into a one-act comedy, which naturally entailed some changes in the plot and composition. Poems that were not in the original also appeared. Griboedov retained the French names, but introduced individual episodes into the play that were more likely related to Moscow or St. Petersburg than to Parisian life. The future master can already be guessed in them, but for now these are just individual touches.
“Young Spouses” is a typically secular comedy. The conflict in it is based on love misunderstandings; there is no talk of any social contradictions. At least this is how the reader perceives it these days. In 1815, secular comedy, against the backdrop of classical tragedies that had recently been received with great enthusiasm and taught to prefer the state to the personal, looked different. There were other circumstances that contributed to the success of Griboedov’s dramatic experience. The comedy of Creuset de Lessard was already known to St. Petersburg theatergoers in the translation of A. G. Volkov, who was actively writing for the stage in those years, and already had certain literary skills. Griboyedov was introduced to dramaturgy for the first time - and, nevertheless, his translation is much more economical and elegant. Moreover, Zagoskin was undoubtedly right, who believed that Griboyedov’s translation was “much better” than the original source itself. “The action moves quickly, there is not a single unnecessary or cold scene: everything is in its place.”
“It is also important that Griboedov’s first experience already stated those principles of dramatic style that would later find brilliant implementation in “Woe from Wit”: a quick change of voices, picking up a cue, a combination of ironic coloring of the characters’ speech with intimate lyrical, a tendency towards aphoristic statements , to semantic, situational and intonational contrasts or oppositions,” writes V.I. Babkin.
It was staged in the capital not without success. Then Griboyedov participated as a co-author in several more plays. The stage became his real passion. He became friends with the director of the St. Petersburg theater, playwright Shakhovsky, and especially with the talented poet and theater expert Pavel Katenin. With Vyazemsky, the playwright writes the vaudeville opera “Who is Brother, Who is Sister, or Deception after Deception,” the music for which is created by A. N. Verstovskoy. Of course, it was a “trinket,” a benefit piece intended for the Moscow actress M.D. Lvova-Sinetskaya, who was distinguished by her gift of impersonation and was especially graceful in the roles of a travesty. P. A. Vyazemsky recalls: “...Director of the Moscow Theater F. F. Kokoshin... asked me to write something for a benefit performance by Lvova Sinetskaya... Just before that time, I met Griboyedov in Moscow, already the author of a famous comedy... and suggested that the two of us take on this business. He readily agreed." This is how the notes of the romance from the vaudeville opera by P. A. Vyazemsky and Griboedov to the music of A. N. Verstovsky “Who is brother, who is sister, or Deception after deception” appeared, published in the almanac “Mnemosyne” in 1824.

Griboyedov - musician

Once the actor-playwright P. A. Karatygin said to Griboyedov: “Ah, Alexander Sergeevich, how many talents God has given you: you are a poet, a musician, you were a dashing cavalryman and, finally, an excellent linguist!” He smiled, looked at me with sad eyes from under his glasses and answered me: “Believe me, Petrusha, whoever has many talents does not have a single real one.” He was modest...”
Decembrist Pyotr Bestuzhev spoke of his friend: “The mind is naturally abundant, enriched with knowledge, the thirst for which does not leave him even now, the soul is sensitive to everything high, noble, heroic. Lively character, inimitable manner of pleasant, tempting treatment, without an admixture of arrogance; gift of speech to a high degree; his pleasant talent in music, and finally, his knowledge of people make him an idol and adornment of the best societies.”
“According to the tradition accepted in Russian noble families, Alexander Sergeevich studied music from childhood. He played the piano very well and had great knowledge of music theory,” reports P. G. Andreev. There are many memories of Griboedov the pianist. “Griboyedov passionately loved music and from a very young age became an excellent piano player. The mechanical part of playing the piano did not present any difficulty for him, and subsequently he studied music completely, like a deep theorist (K. Polevoy). “I loved listening to his magnificent piano playing... He would sit down with them and begin to fantasize... There was so much taste, strength, and wondrous melody here! He was an excellent pianist and a great connoisseur of music: Mozart, Beethoven, Haydn and Weber were his favorite composers” (P. Karatygin).

N. S. Begichev

Griboyedov, a pianist, often performed among friends and at musical evenings as an improvising soloist and accompanist. His partners in playing music together were amateur singers, artists of the Italian opera troupe, and composers. For example, to his accompaniment, Verstovsky performed for the first time the romance “Black Shawl,” which he had just composed. To our great chagrin, most of the plays composed by Griboyedov were not recorded on music paper and are irretrievably lost to us. Only two waltzes have survived. They do not have names, so we will call them by musical terms: Waltz in A-flat major and Waltz in E minor. The first of them was written during the winter of 1823/24. E. P. Sokovnina, the niece of S. I. Begichev, Griboyedov’s best friend, talks about this: “This winter, Griboedov continued to finish his comedy “Woe from Wit” and, in order to more accurately capture all the shades of Moscow society, went to balls and dinners, which he had never been interested in, and then retired for whole days in his office. I still have a waltz composed and written by Griboedov himself, which he handed over to me.” This was the first edition of the B-moll waltz. Sokovnina sent his manuscript to the editors of the Istorichesky Vestnik with the following note: “I am enclosing this waltz in the confidence that it can still bring pleasure to many.” So, Sokovnina’s testimony establishes that the composition of one of the waltzes dates back to the period of the final finishing of Woe from Wit. Another waltz, As major, was apparently written at the same time.

House of N. S. Begichev in Moscow

However, Griboedov's musical creativity was not limited to the waltzes that have come down to us. The daughter of P. N. Akhverdova, who raised Griboyedov’s future wife, told researcher N. V. Shalamytov that on his first trip to Persia (1818), Griboyedov, visiting her mother’s house in Tiflis, often “sat down at the instrument and played with a larger part of his composition. She also recalls that Griboyedov, during his second trip to Persia as minister plenipotentiary (1828), again stayed with P.N. Akhverdova and here he often played “dances of his own composition” for children, the melodies of which, she continues, “I still remember clearly, not very beautiful and uncomplicated.”
The publication of Griboedov’s works edited by I. A. Shlyapkin (1889) states: “As we heard, there is also a mazurka written by A. S. Griboyedov.” Unfortunately, Shlyapkin did not indicate the source of his information.
While studying music with his fiancée and then his young wife, Griboyedov, according to her biographer, K. A. Borozdin, was a strict teacher and tried to cultivate taste in the classical school.” One should think that in his creative aspirations Griboyedov relied primarily on classical examples.
On the other hand, we know that Griboyedov loved folk songs and accepted them only in their pure form. It’s a shame that Alexander Sergeevich’s musical works disappeared without a trace, remaining unrecorded, just as his improvisations disappeared, echoing within the walls of literary and musical salons and living rooms and leaving only memories among listeners. Nevertheless, music for Griboedov was a genuine part of his being, and not just a detail of his surrounding life.
In the memory of Griboyedov's wife, Nina Alexandrovna, who survived him by almost thirty years, his other works were preserved for a long time, including the largest and most significant - the piano sonata. Biographer N.A. Griboyedova says: “Nina Alexandrovna knew a lot of plays and his own compositions, very remarkable for the originality of the melody and masterful arrangement - she willingly played them to those who loved music. Of these, one sonata was especially good, full of soulful charm; She knew that this piece was my favorite and, sitting down at the piano, she never refused me the pleasure of listening to it. One cannot help but regret that these plays remained unrecorded by anyone: “Nina Alexandrovna took them with her.” Thus, Griboyedov’s most serious musical work has not reached us. The impressions of contemporaries from Griboyedov’s improvisations and from his compositions that disappeared completely coincide with the characteristics that can be given to two waltzes published in a collection of salon vocal and instrumental miniatures. - “Lyrical album for 1832.” They stand out noticeably from the piano section of the album. One contemporary review of Lyrical Album said: “The dance department is very weak. In it, only Griboyedov's Waltz in E minor deserves attention, long known, but still not losing its freshness, due to its excellent melody. The author himself played this trinket with excellent skill.” M. M. Ivanov, who wrote an opera based on the plot of “Woe from Wit” - an unsuccessful opera, the best number of which was Griboedov’s B-moll waltz, performed at Famusov’s ball - believes that Chopin and Griboyedov drew from the same source - from the Polish folk song, a melody familiar to both of them.” Both Griboyedov waltzes are small piano pieces, very simple in form and texture; their music is of a lyrical-elegiac nature, lighter in the Waltz in E minor. The first of these waltzes is less known, but the second is now extremely popular. It is well deserved; the music of the waltz in E minor is characterized by some special, tenderly sad poetic comfort; her sincerity and spontaneity touches the soul.

Written for piano, both waltzes exist in a large number of arrangements for various instruments: harp, flute, button accordion and others.
In fact, Griboyedov's Waltz in E Minor is the first Russian waltz that has survived to this day thanks to its artistic merits, and actually sounds in our musical everyday life. He is popular, he is well known by many and is loved by the widest circles of music lovers.
“So, the appearance of Griboyedov as a musician is multifaceted: the great Russian writer possessed not only the creative gift of a composer and improviser, not only the well-known technical perfection of a pianist and some knowledge of other instruments, but also a musical theoretical preparation that was rare in those days,” writes P G. Andreev.
His untimely death did not allow Griboyedov to create new works, which promised to constitute a significant page in the history of Russian literature. But what he did gives grounds to place Griboyedov in the cohort of artists of world significance.

In the literary war between the Arzamas people and the Shishkovites, Katenin and Griboyedov took a special position. The works of the Arzamas people seemed to them lightweight and unnatural, while the Shishkovists seemed outdated. They themselves were looking for new possibilities for verse, even at the expense of lightness and smoothness. Katenin was not afraid of rudeness that was indecent for the public. Griboyedov supported him: he published an article (1816), where he defended Katenin’s ballad “Olga” from criticism and himself sharply criticized V. A. Zhukovsky’s famous ballad “Lyudmila” on the same plot. This article made Griboedov's name famous in the literary world.
Together with Katenin, Griboedov wrote the best of his early works - the prose comedy "Student". During Griboedov’s lifetime, it did not appear either on stage or in print. Perhaps the attacks on literary opponents (Zhukovsky, Batyushkov, Karamzin), whose poems were parodied in the play, seemed indecent to the censors. Moreover, in the main character - the fool Benevalsky - it was not difficult to recognize the traits of these writers.
Griboedov was no less attracted to the author's fame by the behind-the-scenes life of the theater, an indispensable part of which were affairs with actresses. “One of these stories ended tragically,” as S. Petrov reports.

Cornet
A. S. Griboyedov

Two friends of Griboyedov, young revelers Sheremetev and Zavadovsky, competed over the ballerina Istomina. The well-known duelist in the city, Alexander Yakubovich (the future Decembrist), fanned the quarrel, and accused Griboedov of ignoble behavior. Sheremetev had to compete with Zavadovsky, and Yakubovich - with Griboyedov. Both duels were to take place on the same day. But while they were providing assistance to the mortally wounded Sheremetev, time was running out. The next day, Yakubovich was arrested as the instigator and exiled to the Caucasus. Griboyedov was not punished for the duel (he was not looking for a quarrel and did not fight in the end), but public opinion considered him guilty of Sheremetev’s death. The authorities decided to remove from St. Petersburg the official “involved in the story.” Griboyedov was offered a position as secretary of the Russian mission either in Persia or in the United States of America. He chose the former, and it sealed his fate.

A. I. Yakubovich

On the way to Persia, Griboedov stayed in Tiflis for almost a year. There the postponed duel with Yakubovich took place. Griboyedov was wounded in the arm - for him as a musician it was very sensitive.

1817
duel

Griboyedov served in Persia for three years, and then moved as a “diplomatic official” to the staff of the Chief Administrator of Georgia, General A.P. Ermolov. Service under this extraordinary man, an outstanding commander and real dictator of the Caucasus, gave him a lot.
In the years when Griboyedov conceived and wrote Woe from Wit, a fatal gap for Russia began between the authorities and the thinking part of society. Some European educated people resigned in scandal, many others became members of secret anti-government organizations. Griboyedov saw this, and his idea for a comedy matured. Undoubtedly, the fact that the expulsion of the author himself from St. Petersburg was associated with slander played a role here. “In a word, Griboyedov was tormented by a problem - the fate of an intelligent person in Russia,” writes N. M. Druzhinin.

Griboyedov - hussar

The actual plot (“plan,” as they said then) of “Woe from Wit” is simple. Griboyedov himself retold it best of all in a letter to Katenin: “The girl herself, not stupid, prefers a fool to an intelligent man... and this man, of course, is in contradiction with the society around him... Someone out of anger made up about him that he was crazy, no one believed it and everyone repeats... he didn’t give a damn to her and everyone and was like that. The queen is also disappointed about her sugar medovich” (i.e. the heroine was disappointed in the “fool”).
And yet, almost none of his contemporaries understood the plan for “Woe from Wit.” The play was so inconsistent with the usual ideas about comedy that even Pushkin saw it as a flaw, not an innovation. Katenin, and even more so Griboyedov’s magazine ill-wishers, shared the same opinion, and he had them.
First of all, readers are accustomed to the “rule of three unities.” In "Woe from Wit" the unity of place and time is observed, but the main thing - the unity of action - is not visible. Even in Griboyedov’s presentation, at least two plot lines are visible. Firstly, a love triangle: the main character Chatsky ("smart man") - Molchalin ("Shar Medovich") - Sofya Pavlovna ("Queen"). Secondly, the story of the confrontation between the hero and the whole society, which ends with gossip about madness. These lines are connected: after all, it was none other than Sophia who started the gossip. And yet the plot is clearly “bifurcated”.
It was also doubtful to what extent the play had the right to be called a comedy. Of course, in “Woe from Wit” there are many funny lines and many of the characters are amusingly depicted (the dignitary Famusov - Sophia’s father, Colonel Skalozub, the young lady Natalya Dmitrievna, the slacker Repetilov). But this is not enough for a real comedy. The plot itself should be comical - some kind of misunderstanding that is resolved in the finale. In addition, according to the literary ideas of Griboyedov’s time, positive heroes, as a rule, win as a result of cunning tricks, while negative ones are left in the cold.

Manuscript
"Woe from Wit"

First edition
"Woe from Wit"

In Woe from Wit, as literary scholars have noted, everything is very similar - and everything is not the same. It is Chatsky who finds himself in a funny position: he cannot believe that Sophia really loves the “wordless” Molchalin. But the author and the reader do not laugh at all, but are sad and sympathize with the hero, who in the finale runs “...to search the world where there is a corner for the offended feeling...”.
Sophia becomes convinced that Molchalin never loved her, and this is also a dramatic, not a comic situation. The funny thing, however, is Famusov in the finale, in whose house a scandal broke out. But judging by the “plan”, Famusov is a minor character. In the end, there were no winners, and no one was trying to win. There is no one to laugh at either.
The key to understanding Woe from Wit was given by Griboyedov himself. He wrote: “The first outline of this stage poem, as it was born in me, was much more magnificent and of higher significance than now in the vain outfit in which I was forced to clothe it.” He immediately names the reason why he gave this “vain outfit” to the play. “The childish pleasure of hearing my poems in the theater, the desire for them to succeed, forced me to spoil my creation...” So, “Woe from Wit” is not a comedy by design, but a work of a different kind, only then adapted to the conditions of the stage. Perhaps it would be most accurate to call the play a “poetic-dramatic story.” The beginning of the play is morning in Famusov’s house. Griboedov talks about his characters in much more detail than is necessary for the course of the drama. An elderly dignitary lives for his own pleasure, visits with guests, gives balls himself, indulges in “monastic behavior” and slowly pesters the maid... He has one concern - to get his daughter married. He has already found a good groom - Skalozub, about whom he says: “And a golden bag, and aims to become a general.” The daughter, a girl raised on sentimental books, is in love with a quiet, poor official and secretly meets with him at night. However, their dates are very chaste:

He will take your hand and press it to your heart,
He will sigh from the depths of his soul,
Not a free word, and so the whole night passes...

In accordance with the laws of the comedy genre, this is where the intrigue would begin: the lovers, with the help of the maid Lisa, must somehow deceive their father and arrange their happiness. But the intrigue doesn't begin. The reader knows nothing about Sophia's plans. Molchalin, as it turns out at the end of the play, did not want to get married at all. And then suddenly Chatsky, Sophia’s childhood friend, returns from a three-year journey. The fact that Chatsky is in love with Sophia adds, of course, trouble to both her (how to get rid of an unnecessary admirer) and Famusov (won’t he cross Skalozub’s path?). But this is not the main thing in comedy. The point, first of all, is that Chatsky brings with him an outsider’s view of the usual Moscow life. Everyone else is completely satisfied with their position, but Chatsky is able to criticize Moscow life. It turns out that there are values ​​that cannot be included in the usual way of life.
Thus, the hero undermines the basis of the existence of this society - everything as a whole and each character individually. The meaning of Sophia’s life is love for Molchalin, and Chatsky laughs at his dumbness and servility. That’s why it comes out of her mouth: “He’s out of his mind.” Sophia herself, of course, does not understand her words literally, but she is glad that her interlocutor understood them in a literal and not a figurative sense.

He is ready to believe!
Ah, Chatsky! You love to dress everyone up as jesters,
Would you like to try it on yourself?
Other characters seriously prove Chatsky's madness.
Khlestova:
There are also some of the funny ones;
I said something, he started laughing.
Molchalin:
He advised me not to serve in the Archives in Moscow.
Countess granddaughter:
He deigned to call me a milliner!
Natalya Dmitrievna:
And he gave my husband advice to live in the village.

For Khlestova, the main thing is the respect of others, for Molchalin it’s a career, for Natalya Dmitrievna it’s social entertainment. And since Chatsky touches all this with his words and actions, he is “insane in everything,” as the informer and rogue Zagoretsky sums up what has been said.
The understanding that life is imperfect, that everything in it is determined by the desire for a calm, secure existence, is what Griboyedov calls “mind.” That is why he wrote that in his play there are “25 fools for one sane person,” although, of course, there are almost no stupid people there. But in society, Chatsky’s mind is useless. “Will such a mind make a family happy?” - says Sophia, and she is right in her own way.
Chatsky is restless everywhere - not only in Moscow. In St. Petersburg, he “was not given ranks” - he wanted to be useful to the state and could not: “it’s sickening to serve.” At the first appearance, Sophia’s question: “Where is better?” - Chatsky answers: “Where we are not.” It’s not for nothing that at the beginning of the action he appears from nowhere, and at the end he disappears to nowhere.
The hero of a comedy who rejects society and is rejected by it is a typical hero of romanticism. Chatsky bears very little resemblance to the gloomy and self-confident hero. He has more kinship with the future heroes of the Russian classic novel. No matter how different Lermontov’s Pechorin, Leo Tolstoy’s Prince Andrei, Dostoevsky’s “The Teenager”, Versilov are, they are all wanderers who “search the world” for the truth or suffer from the inability to find it. In this regard, Chatsky is their undoubted ancestor.
The open ending of Woe from Wit is also typical for the Russian novel. The initial calm of life in the finale of the play is destroyed. Sophia has lost Molchalin, he will probably be forced to leave Famusov’s house, and Famusov himself will no longer be able to live as before. There was a scandal, and now this pillar of Moscow society is afraid.
Oh my god! What will he say?
Princess Marya Alekseevna!
But what will happen to the heroes next is unknown, and it doesn’t matter: the “story” is completed. “A Tale”, and not a novel, only because “Woe from Wit” is too small in volume for a novel. The concept of Woe from Wit required that the life of the society that Chatsky encounters be shown in all its everyday details. Hence the most noticeable feature of the play is its language and verse.
For the first time in Russian literature, Griboyedov managed to actually write as they speak, and not as people should speak, according to the author.
Every line of the characters is completely natural, right down to the obvious irregularities of speech: “to the hairdresser”, “headlong”, etc. Chatsky, a graduate of the same “Famusov” Moscow, knows its language. Sometimes you can’t tell where Chatsky is speaking and where Famusov is speaking:

They know how to dress themselves up
Taffeta, marigold and haze,
They won’t say a word in simplicity, everything will be done with a grimace -
This is Famusov.
That others, just as of old,
The regiments are busy recruiting teachers,
More in number, cheaper in price? –

This is Chatsky laughing at his Moscow upbringing. But his words may sound completely different. Some of his monologues are solemn speeches:

Where? Show us, fathers of the fatherland,
Which ones should we take as models?
Aren't these the ones who are rich in robbery?
They found protection from court in friends, in kinship,
Magnificent building chambers...
Others are beautiful sad lyrical poems:
In the carriage so-and-so on the way
An unimaginable plain, sitting idly,
Everything is visible ahead
Light, blue, varied...

Already this multitude of intonations, inaccessible to other characters (with the partial exception of Sophia), suggests that Chatsky is more humane than them...
Strange as it may seem, it would be more difficult for Griboyedov to achieve such naturalness in prose than in poetry. Russian prose was still insufficiently developed at that time. In his poems, the author had examples of Derzhavin, Krylov, playwright N. Khmelnitsky, and his literary opponents - the Arzamas people. But the traditional verse of “high comedy” - iambic hexameter, too monotonously measured - was not suitable for “Woe from Wit”. Griboedov wrote the play in iambic with a different number of feet (free). In Russian drama, it was used before only in a few forgotten experiments. Later attempts to imitate Griboyedov were not successful: the culture of free iambic was lost. In Griboyedov’s time, this was the most flexible size. Fables have long been written to them: for example, Krylov, even before Griboyedov, masterfully imitated colloquial speech in them. The same meter was used in the genre of elegy, where Batyushkov and other poets learned to perfectly convey melancholic feelings. A free iambic may also resemble an ode, as in Chatsky’s accusatory monologues.
The size was perfect for the design. The result is brilliant, light, and when necessary, deep stage dialogue, which is etched in the memory from one reading. At least a hundred of Griboyedov’s poems became proverbs. And the variety of conversational intonations of the text provides truly limitless possibilities for acting and directorial interpretations. The collision of a lonely hero with the world is always exciting. That is why Woe from Wit will be performed on stage as long as the Russian theater exists.
Griboyedov spent 1823 and 1824 on vacation - in Moscow, in the village of the Begichevs, in St. Petersburg. His new work, the comedy Woe from Wit, created a sensation. It was conceived in Persia, started in Tiflis, and finished in the village of the Begichevs. The author read the play in many literary salons. But he failed to publish or stage Woe from Wit. Hardly a comedy was missed because of its political urgency.
“He already understood that literature was his true calling. I conceived new works. He no longer wanted to write comedies. There was something more grandiose in my head - a tragedy from ancient Armenian history - a drama about 1812. From all this, only plans remain,” writes P. M. Volodin.

In January 1826, after the Decembrist uprising, Griboyedov was arrested on suspicion of involvement in a conspiracy. There is a legend that Ermolov warned him about the arrest and thereby gave him the opportunity to destroy incriminating papers. During the investigation, Griboyedov behaved boldly, was ready, in turn, to blame his accusers for the wrong arrest (his letter on this matter to the tsar was returned with the remark that “they don’t write to the sovereign in such a tone”), but categorically denied belonging to a secret society. The majority of the Decembrists (with the exception of Obolensky and Trubetskoy, who slandered him) also confirmed this in their testimony. A few months later, he was not only released, but also received another rank, as well as an allowance in the amount of an annual salary. There really was no serious evidence against him, and even now there is no documentary evidence that the writer somehow participated in the activities of secret societies. On the contrary, he is credited with a disparaging description of the conspiracy: “One hundred warrant officers want to turn Russia over!” But, perhaps, Griboyedov owed such a complete acquittal to the intercession of a relative - General I. F. Paskevich, a favorite of Nicholas I.

A. S. Griboyedov
1827

Paskevich turned out to be Griboyedov’s new boss in the Caucasus. He sincerely loved and appreciated the writer. He was with the general during the war with Persia, and participated in peace negotiations in the village of Turkmenchay. Griboedov drew up the final version of the peace treaty, which was extremely beneficial for Russia. In the spring of 1828, Alexander Sergeevich was sent to St. Petersburg with the text of the agreement. He also brought with him the manuscript of the tragedy in verse “Georgian Night”. Two scenes from it have survived, but whether the author finished the tragedy is unknown.

Griboedov the diplomat

Conclusion
Turkmanchay Treaty

Griboyedov took charge of foreign relations with Persia and Turkey, accompanied Paskevich on his campaign against Erivan, and conducted peace negotiations with the heir to the Persian throne, which ended with the conclusion of the Turkmanchay Peace, which was very beneficial for Russia. With the text of the Turkmanchay Treaty, he was sent to the Tsar in St. Petersburg, received a large monetary reward and a brilliant appointment as plenipotentiary ambassador to Persia. Until then, Griboyedov, in his own words, was “a beggar, a servant of the sovereign made from bread,” “in an instant he became both noble and rich.” His “fiery passion... for extraordinary deeds”, for “boundless plans” has now found an outcome.

Conclusion
Turkmanchay Treaty

In June of the same 1828, Griboedov was appointed envoy plenipotentiary to Persia. On the way, in Tiflis, he fell passionately in love with Princess Nina Chavchavadze, the daughter of his old friend, the Georgian poet Alexander Chavchavadze, and in October he married her. The marital happiness was immeasurable, but it was so short and soon ended. A month after the wedding, the young couple left for Persia. Nina stopped in border Tabriz, and Griboyedov moved further - to the capital of Persia, Tehran. Just a month later, tragedy unfolded there.

Black Rose
Tiflis
Nina Griboyedova
— Chavchavadze

She was 16 years old
he is 38.
Griboyedov was in a hurry...

The Turkmanchay Treaty created a preferential position for Russia in Persia. This inevitably pitted Russia against England, which in turn was interested in predominant influence on Persian affairs. One of the most difficult knots in world politics was being tied in Persia. Griboedov, deeply aware that the outcome of the diplomatic duel with England would depend only on the economic conquest of Persia by Russian capital, in opposition to the East India Trading Company, put forward a grandiose project for the creation of the “Russian Transcaucasian Company”, containing “gigantic plans” for the capitalization of the entire country. In the accompanying note, Griboyedov tried in every possible way to prove that his project did not contain any novelty. However, the project, which was at least half a century ahead of Russian reality, did not meet with sympathy in Russian government circles, in particular, those who were afraid of the exclusive rights that Griboyedov demanded for the Company and its main figures. However, the British immediately felt in him a most dangerous enemy, who in Persia, according to the testimony of one contemporary (who generally did not sympathize with Griboedov), replaced “an army of twenty thousand with his single face.”
But his mission was extremely thankless. He had to strive, among other things, for Persia to release natives of Russia who wanted to return to their homeland. Among them was the Shah's eunuch Mirza Yakub, an Armenian by birth. As the Russian representative, Griboyedov could not help but accept it, but in the eyes of the Iranians it looked like the greatest insult inflicted on their country. They were especially outraged that Mirza Yakub, a Christian by birth who converted to Islam, was planning to renounce Islam. The spiritual leaders of Tehran Muslims ordered the people to go to the Russian mission and kill the apostate. Everything turned out even worse. Griboedov, along with the entire staff of the Russian mission (with the exception of the secretary who accidentally escaped) during an attack on it by a crowd fanaticized by the mullahs, who in turn acted on the orders of the British.

Monastery of St. David
late 19th century photograph

Griboyedov was buried in his beloved Tiflis, in the monastery of St. David on Mount Mtamtsminda. At his grave, the widow erected a monument to him with the inscription: “Your mind and deeds are immortal in Russian memory, but why did my love survive you?”

Monument at the grave
A. S. Griboedova
in the church of St. David
in Georgia

Inscription on Griboedov's grave

“Your mind and deeds are immortal in the memory of Russians,
but why did my love survive you?”

And here are the lines from Pushkin’s memoirs: “Two oxen harnessed to a cart were climbing a steep road. Several Georgians accompanied the cart. “Where are you from?” I asked them. "From Tehran." - “What are you bringing?” - “Griboeda”. It was the body of the murdered Griboedov, which was transported to Tiflis...”
“What a pity that Griboyedov did not leave his notes! It would be up to his friends to write his biography; but wonderful people disappear among us, leaving no trace of themselves. We are lazy and incurious,” says N. M. Druzhinin.
The significance of any writer of the past of our time is tested, first of all, by how close his spiritual image is to us, how much his work serves our historical cause. Griboyedov fully withstands this test. He is close and dear to people as a writer, faithful to the truth of life, as a leading figure of his time - a patriot, humanist and freedom-lover, who had a deep and fruitful impact on the development of Russian national culture.

And I went to meet him,
and all of Tiflis is with me
Moved by the crowd, he walked to the Erivan outpost.
They cried on the rooftops when I fell unconscious...
Oh, why did my love survive him!!

A. Odoevsky

Griboyedov and his great comedy are surrounded by truly popular love in our country. Now more than ever, the words inscribed on Griboedov’s gravestone sound loudly and convincingly:
“Your mind and deeds are immortal in Russian memory...”

Bibliography:

1. Andreev, N.V. Great writers of Russia [Text] / N.V. Andreev. – M.: Mysl, 1988.
2. Andreev, P. G. Griboyedov - musician [Text] / P. G. Andreev. – M.: Elista, 1963.
3. Babkin, V. M. A. S. Griboyedov in Russian literature [Text] / V. M. Babkin. – L., 1968.
4. Volodin, P. M. History of Russian literature of the 19th century [Text] / P. M. Volodin. – M., 1962
5. Druzhinin, N. M. A. S. Griboedov in Russian criticism [Text] / N. M. Druzhinin. – M., 1958.
6. Orlov, V. N. A. S. Griboedov [Text] / V. N. Orlov. – 2nd ed. – M.
7. Petrov, S. A. S. Griboedov [Text] / S. A. Petrov. – M., 1955.