What to do if the auction did not take place. Actions in case of a failed electronic auction Recognition of the auction as invalid grounds

As part of the request for proposals after failed auction It is, however, prohibited to change the procurement object (however, it is formally possible, but not recommended, to change its cost, as well as the deadlines for execution). The notice to the Unified Information System must be submitted by the customer no later than 5 days (calendar) before the day of the request for proposals. At the same time, according to 44-FZ, the customer has the right to independently send invitations to participate in the procurement process to those persons who, in his opinion, are capable of fulfilling the terms of the contract. However, these persons in this case must be indispensable counterparties of the customer for at least 18 months before the date of request for similar supplies. The auction did not take place if all applications were rejected at the stage of consideration of the first parts. In theory this is hardly possible, but in reality electronic trading Anything can happen. Accordingly, in this case the previous paragraph on the request for proposals is applicable.

Article 71. Consequences of declaring an electronic auction invalid

Federal Law and documentation about such an auction or about the non-compliance of participants in such an auction and the applications they submitted with the requirements of this Federal Law and (or) documentation about such an auction; 4) the contract is concluded in accordance with paragraph 25 of part 1 of Article 93 of this Federal Law in the manner established by Article 70 of this Federal Law, with a participant in such an auction, the application for participation in which was submitted: a) earlier than other applications for participation in such an auction, if several participants in such an auction and the applications they submitted were found to comply with the requirements of this Federal Law and the documentation for such an auction; b) the only participant in such an auction, if only one participant in such an auction and the application submitted by him are recognized as complying with the requirements of this Federal Law and the documentation on such an auction. 3.1.

Failed auction

Approvals in accordance with paragraph 25 of part 1 of article 93 of the Law on contract system arises only if an open competition, a competition with limited participation, a two-stage competition, a repeated competition, or a request for proposals are declared invalid. Explanations on this issue given in Letter of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia No. 658-EE/D28i, FAS Russia No. ATs/1587/15 dated January 20, 2015. The data in the table does not take into account changes from 01/01/2015 (no approval is required now) No. Grounds for recognition of the electronic auction failed Actions Customer Approval Conclusion of the contract 1 Not a single application has been submitted (Part.
16th century 66 44-FZ) The customer makes changes to the schedule (procurement plan) and carries out the purchase by conducting a request for proposals in accordance with clause 8, part 2, art. 83 44-FZ or in another way in accordance with 44-FZ (part 4 of Art.

Article 71 44-FZ - consequences of declaring an electronic auction invalid

Federal Law and documentation about such an auction or about the non-compliance of this participant and this application with the requirements of this Federal Law and (or) documentation about such an auction with justification said decision, including indicating the provisions of this Federal Law and (or) documentation about such an auction, which this application does not comply with; b) the decision of each member of the auction commission on the compliance of the only participant in such an auction and the application submitted by him for participation in it with the requirements of this Federal Law and the documentation on such an auction, or on the non-compliance of this participant and the application submitted by him for participation in such an auction with the requirements of this Federal Law and ( or) documentation about such auction; ConsultantPlus: note. From July 1, 2018, Federal Law dated December 31, 2017 N 504-FZ amends paragraph 4 of part 2 of Article 71. Cm.
Federal Law) 4 Based on the results of consideration of the first parts of applications, the auction commission decided to refuse admission to participation of all procurement participants (Part 8, Article 67 44-FZ). The Customer makes changes to the schedule (procurement plan) and carries out the purchase by conducting a request proposals in accordance with clause 8, part 2, art. 83 44-FZ or in another way in accordance with 44-FZ (Part 4 of Article 71 44-FZ) 5 The Auction Commission decided to recognize only one procurement participant who submitted an application to participate in such an auction as its participant (Part 8 Article 67 44-FZ) Coordination of the Customer’s decision with the body authorized to exercise control in the field of procurement (FAS, Rosoboronzakaz) (clause 25, part 1, Article 93 44-FZ) Conclusion of a contract with sole supplier(Clause 4, Part 2, Article 71, Clause 25, Part 1, Art.

The auction was declared invalid

Federal Law due to the fact that the auction commission has made a decision that all second parts of applications for participation in it do not meet the requirements established by the electronic auction documentation, or on the grounds provided for in Part 15 of Article 70 of this Federal Law, the customer makes changes to the plan - schedule (if necessary, also in the procurement plan) and carries out the procurement by conducting a request for proposals in accordance with paragraph 8 of part 2 of Article 83 of this Federal Law (in this case, the procurement object cannot be changed) or otherwise in accordance with this Federal Law.

Electronic auction declared invalid

From July 1, 2018, Federal Law dated December 31, 2017 N 504-FZ amends Part 3.1 of Article 71. See the text in a future edition. 3.1. If the electronic auction is declared invalid on the grounds provided for in Part 13 of Article 69 of this Federal Law due to the fact that the auction commission made a decision on compliance with the requirements established by the documentation for the electronic auction, only one second part of the application for participation in it, a contract with a participant in such an auction who submitted the said application is concluded in accordance with clause 25 of part 1 of Article 93 of this Federal Law in the manner established by Article 70 of this Federal Law. (Part 3.1 introduced by Federal Law dated June 4, 2014 N 140-FZ) ConsultantPlus: note. From July 1, 2018, Federal Law dated December 31, 2017 N 504-FZ amends Part 4 of Article 71.
Cm.

If the auction is declared invalid due to

Federal Law and contained on the date and time of the deadline for filing applications for participation in such an auction in the register of participants in such an auction who have received accreditation on the electronic platform; 2) operator electronic platform within the period specified in paragraph 1 of this part, is obliged to send a notification the only participant such an auction; 3) the auction commission, within three working days from the date the customer receives the second part of this application from the only participant in such an auction and the documents specified in paragraph 1 of this part, considers this application and the specified documents for compliance with the requirements of this Federal Law and the documentation on such an auction and sends to the operator of the electronic site a protocol for considering the application of the only participant in such an auction, signed by members of the auction commission.

If the electronic auction is declared invalid

Attention

The only application - the procedure The laws on electronic trading FZ-44 and FZ-223 are constantly supplemented and coordinated with others regulations. In 2014, additional amendments were adopted to No. 498-FZ and Art. 25 No. 44-ФЗ within the framework of which the issue of conditions is considered in more detail failed auction. The grounds are determined by Art. 71, parts 1-3.1 No. 44-FZ.

Provided that the only application for participation in the auction was under consideration at the site, it is considered to be the winning one. The key feature of declaring an auction invalid for this reason is the admission of only one participant to participate in it. The customer may enter into a contract agreement with a single participant.
The conditions under which a contract can be signed should be taken into account. This is possible only with that participant (Article 70 of Federal Law-44) whose application fully meets the requirements.
This document should reflect the following information:

• Title of the document;
• place, time and date of its preparation;
• list of members of the auction commission;
• name of the failed auction;
• information about the customer;
• auction object;
• the reason for declaring the auction invalid;
• information about the site where the protocol will be placed.

So, Art. 71 of Law No. 44 defines 5 possible situations in which the auction is declared invalid. The same article defines the order of actions that the customer must take after the event receives the specified status.
Federal Law “On the privatization of state and municipal property” (as amended and supplemented) if the auction for the sale of state or municipal property is declared invalid, then the sale of the specified property is carried out through a public offer. If the auction does not take place, the only participant in the auction, no later than twenty days after the day of the auction, has the right to conclude a purchase and sale agreement or a lease agreement for the auctioned item. land plot, and the organ state power or the local government body, by whose decision the auction was held, is obliged to conclude an agreement with the only auction participant at the starting price of the auction.

The auction was declared invalid; one application was submitted under Federal Law 44

Based on the above, concluding an agreement with a single participant failed trades does not comply with the requirements of civil law, and also contradicts the essence of the auction itself. In addition, in accordance with the current judicial practice submitting an application to participate in the auction does not mean concluding an agreement with the auction organizer by accepting a public offer. A contract is a two- or multilateral transaction that implies the emergence of rights and obligations for all its parties.

If we assume that the notice of the auction organizer is an offer to conclude an agreement with the subject of the auction, then the application of a potential participant should indeed be considered acceptance. But the bidder does not bear any obligations to conduct the auction, since providing the required documents and making a deposit are his rights, but not his obligations.

In most cases, when the phrase “the purchase did not take place” is announced, participants have the impression that either there are no proposals for the tender, or all applications for participation in it have been rejected. However, there are many more cases where a purchase is declared unsuccessful.

Consider this for different stages procedures.

All bases are collected in the table.

Submitting applications	Consideration			Conclusion of a contract
1. There are no offers. 2. Only one application has been submitted.	General basis	For competitive procedures	For electronic auction	The winner’s evasion from concluding a contract and the subsequent evasion of the second participant from signing the contract.
	1. All proposals were rejected. 2.Only one was found to meet the requirements.	When conducting a competition with limited participation: 1. No participant is called upon to meet additional requirements. 2. Only one participant was admitted based on the results of the prequalification selection.	When conducting an electronic auction, if there are no price offers at the auction within 10 minutes after the start of the auction.
		During the second stage 1. There are no offers. 2. Only 1 proposal was submitted or all participants were rejected. 3. Only one application was found eligible.

Competitive procedures

If during a competition a public procurement is declared invalid, 44-FZ provides for two cases further development events: carry out a new or repeated one, or purchase from a single supplier.

The difference between a new government procurement and a repeated one is that if the object, volume, requirements for participants do not change, that is, all conditions remain the same (except for the period for fulfilling the terms of the contract, which is extended for the period necessary for the repeated order, as well as the initial price, which can be increased by no more than 10%), then the order is repeated, otherwise - new.

When there are no applications submitted or they are found to be inappropriate, the procedure is repeated. Publication of a notice in repeat procedure carried out at least 10 days before the date of opening the envelopes (not 20 days, as usual).

If a repeat competition does not take place in the future for the same reasons (Part 2 of Article 55), then the customer has the right to carry out the procedure by reducing the deadline for submitting applications to 5 working days or in another way at the discretion of the customer.

If the procurement does not take place, the sole supplier enters into a contract if its application meets the requirements of the law and documentation. In this case, the customer must receive (clause 25, part 1, article 93).

This group will not include the case when, based on the results of the prequalification selection of a two-stage competition, only one participant is recognized as meeting the requirements (). The customer makes the purchase again, due to the fact that it is not possible to discuss the characteristics of the order object with several suppliers.

Electronic auction

When recognizing an electronic auction failed customer or enters into a contract with, while approval from the control body is not required (in cases provided for in Part 16 of Article 66, Part 8 of Article 67, Part 20 of Article 68, Part 13 of Article 69).

Or, if the auction did not take place, changes to the procurement plan are made if necessary in accordance with Part 6 of Art. 17, changes in the schedule are required, then the order is carried out again (part 16 of article 66, part 8 of article 67, part 13 of article 69, part 15 of article 70). Art. 92, in addition to the possibility of re-ordering, the customer has the right, in agreement with the control body, to purchase from a single supplier in accordance with clause 24, part 1 of Art. 93.

Sometimes, for a number of reasons, an electronic auction under 44-FZ may not take place (more precisely, it will be declared failed).

1. The auction did not take place if there was only one participant
In this case, the customer enters into a contract with this participant as the winner, provided that the second part of the application meets the established requirements under 44-FZ and auction documentation. In this case, approval from the regulatory authorities is not required, since according to the conditions, one application is sufficient for quorum if it is completed correctly. Naturally, if you refuse, you will be held liable as if you had participated in a full-fledged tender with many participants and won it. If you submitted a single bid and it did not go through, the customer must hold a new tender.

2. The auction did not take place if there were several participants
a) Let’s assume that there are several participants in an electronic auction, but only one of them meets the requirements for the second part of the application. Accordingly, in this case the rule of paragraph “1” is applicable, that is, the government customer enters into a contract with this participant without approval from the regulatory authority.
b) There are several participants in the auction, but the government customer rejected all applications at the stage of consideration of the second parts. The solution is to hold new auctions.

3. No bids have been submitted (there are no participants in the auction)

According to Part 4 of Art. 71 44-FZ, the customer can make a request for proposals for the auction. As part of a request for proposals after a failed auction, it is prohibited, however, to change the procurement object (however, it is formally possible, but not recommended, to change its cost, as well as the deadlines). The notice to the Unified Information System must be submitted by the customer no later than 5 days (calendar) before the day of the request for proposals. At the same time, according to 44-FZ, the customer has the right to independently send invitations to participate in the procurement process to those persons who, in his opinion, are capable of fulfilling the terms of the contract. However, in this case, these persons must be indispensable counterparties of the customer for at least 18 months before the date of request for similar supplies.

4. The auction did not take place if all applications were rejected at the stage of consideration of the first parts
In theory, this is hardly possible, but in reality, anything can happen in electronic trading. Accordingly, in this case the previous paragraph on the request for proposals is applicable. If, of all applications, based on the results of consideration of the first parts (and not the second), only one participant is admitted, then, according to Part 2 of Article 71, the problem is resolved by approval from the regulatory body.

5. The auction did not take place because none of the participants came to it
According to Part 3 of Article 71, the problem is resolved by approval from the regulatory authority (the first application that meets the conditions of the auction). If no application matches, or the application matches, but the participant is ready for termination, then the clause applicable under the terms of 44-FZ is applied:

"3. If an electronic auction is declared invalid on the grounds provided for in Part 20 of Article 68 of this Federal Law due to the fact that within ten minutes after the start of such an auction, none of its participants submitted a proposal for the contract price:

4) the contract is concluded in accordance with paragraph 25 of part 1 of Article 93 of this Federal Law in the manner established by Article 70 of this Federal Law, with a participant in such an auction, the application for participation in which was submitted:

a) earlier than other applications for participation in such an auction, if several participants in such an auction and the applications submitted by them are recognized as complying with the requirements of this Federal Law and the documentation on such an auction.”

Failed electronic auction. Failed auction in electronic form.

• The concept of “failed electronic auction” means the absence of bidding when placing a specific order. At the same time, it is not at all necessary to imply that the contract (for this order) will not be concluded. For example, only 1 URZ showed up for the auction, it turns out that there will be no bidding, this URZ will not play with itself at the auction. It turns out. That the electronic auction (UAEF) was declared invalid, and the state. the contract will be concluded with this (the only one that applied) RZ.

A list of situations in which electronic auctions are declared invalid, but government contracts are still concluded.

• Only 1 URZ submitted an application (see above).

• Only 1 URZ was admitted to the UAEF. His application was found compliant, the rest were rejected.

• Several URZs were admitted, but none of the URZs made bids at the auction. In this case, the winner is the URZ who submitted his application before everyone else. A contract is concluded with him.

The electronic auction was declared invalid. Regulations and executed documents.

• If the auction (OAEF) is declared invalid, then, depending on whether there is a participant admitted to it, the actions and documents drawn up are as follows.

• A protocol for declaring the electronic auction (OAEF) invalid is drawn up and posted on the site.

Recognition of the electronic auction as invalid.

• This is a procedure that involves drawing up and posting a protocol on declaring the auction (OAEF) invalid.

Protocol for declaring an electronic auction invalid. There is a participant (admitted), and a state contract will be concluded with him.

The protocol states.

• Reason for declaring the auction invalid: only 1 participant was admitted and/or declared.

• Information that a state agreement will be concluded with this participant. Contract.

• If there were other participants, but their applications were rejected, then the reasons for the rejection of applications are indicated.

Protocol for declaring an electronic auction invalid. There were no applications submitted at all.

The protocol states.

• Fixing the fact: the electronic auction is recognized (the reason is indicated) as invalid.

• Reason for declaring the auction invalid: no bids were submitted.

The protocol of a failed electronic auction is posted on the ETP; it is a document that records the very fact that the electronic auction (OAEF) was recognized as failed, and the reasons are given: 1 participant or their absence.

TENDER DEPARTMENT REMOTELY Preparation of applications Control of finished Maximum % tolerance Help with participation Search for tenders Tender conveyor FAS and RNP Protocols of disagreements Controversial situations

SOLUTION ANY TASKS WHEN WORKING ON GOVERNMENT ORDER FAST and COMPLETELY

Consequences of declaring an electronic auction invalid.

• There is one participant.

• Concluding a contract with this participant.

• No participants or applications.

• Repeated auction.

• Replacement of an order.

Cases of declaring an electronic auction invalid.

• No applications.

• All applications (all URZ) were rejected.

• 1 participant allowed.

• There were no offers during the bidding.

• If only 1 (one) participant is admitted to the auction, a contract is concluded with him.

• If several RRPs are admitted to the auction at once, but no one has made “moves,” the contract is concluded with the RRP that submitted its bid before everyone else.

• If there were no applications or all applications were rejected, but the order is processed again.

Repeated auction in electronic form.

• Implies a procedure for re-placing an order if the initial auction is declared invalid, and there is no one to conclude a contract with.

• Rules and actions when re-auction- the same as with the original one.

Using an electronic auction, the customer determines the supplier (performer, contractor). Auctions are held on a special electronic trading platform (ETP), where the winner is the one who offers the lowest price.

Government institutions are obliged to carry out electronic auctions if necessary, purchase goods, works or services that, in accordance with the order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2019-r dated October 31, 2015, are included in the List.

Cases of an auction being declared invalid
Current legislation identifies 4 cases in which an electronic auction is considered invalid:

1. When submitting for tender single application or their absence.
2. After reviewing the applications, the competition commission decided to admit one participant to the auction or rejected all applications.
3. After the start of the auction, not a single proposal was submitted regarding the contract price within 10 minutes.
4. Neither the auction winner nor the second participant confirmed their desire to enter into an agreement with the customer after the end of the auction.

In the first two cases, the customer has the right to conclude a contract with the person who submitted an application for the auction (if it meets the requirements). In this case, the contract price cannot exceed that originally announced by the customer.

If situation No. 3 arises, the contract can be concluded after its approval by the control body. In this case, the counterparty may be an auction participant who submitted an application earlier than the others or the only participant if his application meets the established requirements.

In the fourth situation, or if the only participant is unwilling to enter into a contract, the customer must make changes to its procurement schedule and conduct the procurement using another procurement method - in the form of a request for proposals or another method.

If the customer, after a failed auction, decided to conclude a contract with a single supplier, then he does not have the right to make changes to the contract (according to the law on the contract system of public procurement).

The procedure for concluding a contract with a single supplier
In the event of a failed electronic auction, the customer can enter into an agreement with a single supplier only after the consent of the body authorized to monitor the procurement sphere.

Article 70 Part 2 of the Federal Law No. 44 establishes that the customer, within 5 days after placement in a single information system(EIS) of the protocol on the results of the auction must publish the draft government contract without his signature. The counterparty signs this project within 5 days, starting from the date of placement of the project.

Uncertainty in the interpretation of norms
It remains unclear in what order the government customer should sign a contract with a single supplier. If we refer to the letter from the Ministry economic development RF No. D28i-1616 dated August 19, 2014, then we will see the following in paragraph 8 of the letter: the government customer must initially agree on the signing of the contract with the regulatory authority and only then begin the procedure for concluding it with the counterparty. Otherwise, the performer (contractor) may be misled when a government contract is sent to him that has not yet been approved by the control body. This may lead to premature financial expenses contractor who will be allocated to ensure the execution of the contract. Also, the customer may be fined for such actions.

Approval of the conclusion of a government contract
In order for the regulatory authority to consider the possibility of concluding a government contract with a single contractor, the customer must send him a corresponding appeal.

When considering an appeal, the authorized control body must be guided by the Procedure, which was approved in Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation No. 537 dated September 13, 2013.

To minimize the risk of refusal to sign a contract with a single supplier, it is advisable to perform the following preliminary steps:

• submit a request to the only participant in the failed auction for confirmation that he will conclude a contract on the terms specified in the government procurement documentation at a price not higher than the one originally announced at the auction;
• prepare a written justification that the selected supplier fully complies with the requirements of 44-FZ legislation and auction documentation.

If the deadlines or procedure for sending documents or information to the procurement control body to agree on the desire to conclude a contract with a single supplier are violated, the official may be fined 50 thousand rubles.