Quotes. Lopakhin - characterization of the hero (Cherry Orchard A.P. Chekhov) Lopakhin cherry orchard characterization name

Introduction

"... if it (the role) fails, then the whole play will fail." So in one of the letters Chekhov spoke about the role of Lopakhin from the play "The Cherry Orchard". Oddly enough, the author places the focus not on Ranevskaya, the owner of the cherry orchard, but on Lopakhin. A merchant, a rather limited person, himself honestly admitting that he is essentially a "fool and an idiot" - this is the characterization of Lopakhin from "The Cherry Orchard" that is remembered by readers in the first place. And yet it is his author who calls the "central" figure in the work! He is echoed by a number of critics who define this hero as a hero of the new time, a viable person of a “new formation”, with a sober and clear view of things. In order to better understand this contradictory image, let us analyze Lopakhin.

Lopakhin's life path

The fate of Lopakhin and Yermolai Alekseevich was closely intertwined with the fate of the Ranevskaya family from the very beginning. His father was a serf with Ranevskaya's father, he traded "in the village in a shop." Once, - recalls Lopakhin in the first act - his father drank and broke his face. Then the young Ranevskaya took him to her place, washed him and consoled him: "Don't cry, little man, he will heal before the wedding."

Lopakhin still remembers these words, and they echo in him in two ways. On the one hand, he is pleased with the caress of Ranevskaya, on the other, the word "little man" hurts his pride. It was his father who was a peasant, Lopakhin protests, and he himself "got into the world", became a merchant. He has a lot of money, "a white vest and yellow shoes" - and he achieved all this himself. His parents did not teach him anything, his father only beat him drunk. Remembering this, the hero admits that, in essence, he remained a peasant peasant: his handwriting is bad, but he does not understand anything in books - “he read a book and fell asleep.”

Lopakhin's energy and hard work deserves undoubted respect. From five o'clock he is already on his feet, working from morning till evening and cannot imagine his life without work. An interesting detail - because of his activities, he does not have enough time all the time, some business trips that he goes on are constantly mentioned. This hero in the play looks at his watch more often than others. In contrast to the strikingly impractical Ranevskaya family, he knows the count of both time and money.

At the same time, Lopakhin cannot be called a money-grubber or an unprincipled "merchant-grabber", like those merchants whose images Ostrovsky liked to draw so much. This can be evidenced by at least the ease with which he part with his money. In the course of the play, Lopakhin will repeatedly give or offer money on credit (recall the dialogue with Petya Trofimov and the eternal debtor Simeonov-Pishchik).

And most importantly, Lopakhin is sincerely worried about the fate of Ranevskaya and her estate. Merchants from Ostrovsky's plays would never do what comes to Lopakhin's mind - he himself offers Ranevskaya a way out of the situation. But the profit that can be obtained by renting a cherry orchard for summer cottages is not at all small (Lopakhin himself calculates it). And it would be much more profitable to wait for the trading day and quietly buy a profitable estate. But no, the hero is not like that, he will repeatedly invite Ranevskaya to think about his fate. Lopakhin does not want to buy a cherry orchard. “I teach you every day,” he says desperately to Ranevskaya shortly before the auction. And it is not his fault that in response he will hear the following: dachas are "so common", Ranevskaya will never agree to this. But he, Lopakhin, let him not go away, with him "still more fun" ...

Characteristics of Lopakhin through the eyes of other characters

So, we are faced with an extraordinary character in which business acumen and a practical mind are combined with a sincere affection for the Ranevsky family, and this affection, in turn, contradicts his desire to cash in on their estate. To get a more accurate idea of ​​the image of Lopakhin in the play "The Cherry Orchard" by Chekhov, let's look at how the other characters respond about him. The range of these responses will be wide - from "the enormous mind of man" (Simeonov-Pischik) to "a predatory beast that eats everything in its path" (Petya).

A vivid negative characteristic belongs to Ranevskaya's brother, Gaev: "boor, fist." Somewhat adorns Lopakhin in the eyes of Gayev is the fact that he is "Varin's fiance", and yet this does not prevent Gayev from considering the merchant a limited person. However, let's see from whose lips such a description of Lopakhin sounds in the play? Lopakhin himself repeats it, and he repeats without malice: "Let him speak." For him, in his own words, only one thing is important - that "amazing, touching eyes" of Ranevskaya looked at him "as before."

Ranevskaya herself refers to Lopakhin with warmth. For her, he is "a good, interesting person." And yet, from each phrase of Ranevskaya it is clear that he and Lopakhin are people of different circles. Lopakhin sees in Ranevskaya something more than just an old acquaintance ...

Love test

Throughout the play, every now and then comes the conversation about the marriage of Lopakhin and Varya, it is spoken of as a matter that has already been decided. In response to Ranevskaya's direct offer to take Varya as his wife, the hero replies: "I don't mind ... She's a good girl." And yet the wedding never took place. But why?

Of course, this can be explained by the practicality of Lopakhin the merchant, who does not want to take a dowry for himself. In addition, Varya has certain rights to the cherry orchard, and has a heart for it. The clearing of the garden stands between them. Varya explains her love failure even easier: in her opinion, Lopakhin simply does not have time for feelings, he is a businessman, unable to love. On the other hand, Varya herself does not suit Lopakhin. Her world is limited by household chores, she is dry and "looks like a nun." Lopakhin, on the other hand, has repeatedly shown the breadth of his soul (recall his statement about the giants, who are so lacking in Russia). From the incoherent dialogues between Varya and Lopakhin, it becomes clear: they absolutely do not understand each other. And Lopakhin, deciding for himself the Hamlet question "To be or not to be?", Is acting honestly. Realizing that he will not find happiness with Varya, he, like a district Hamlet, says: "Okhmelia, go to the monastery" ...

The point, however, is not only the incompatibility of Lopakhin and Varya, but that the hero has another, not expressed love. This is Lyubov Andreevna Ranevskaya, whom he loves "more than his own." Throughout the play, the leitmotif is Lopakhin's light, reverent attitude to Ranevskaya. He decides to make an offer to Varya after a request from Ranevskaya, but here he cannot overpower himself.

Lopakhin's tragedy lies in the fact that he remained for Ranevskaya the peasant whom she once carefully washed. And the moment he finally understands that the “dear” that he kept in his soul will not be understood, a turning point occurs. All the heroes of The Cherry Orchard lose something of their own, and Lopakhin is no exception. Only in the image of Lopakhin does his feeling for Ranevskaya act as a cherry orchard.

Lopakhin's celebration

And now it happened - Lopakhin acquires the estate of Ranevskaya from the auction. Lopakhin is the new owner of the cherry orchard! Now in his character a predatory beginning really appears: "I can pay for everything!" The understanding that he bought an estate where once, "poor and illiterate", did not dare to go beyond the kitchen, intoxicates him. But in his voice one can hear irony, a mockery of himself. Apparently, Lopakhin already understands that his celebration will not last long - he can buy a cherry orchard, "which is not more beautiful in the world," but buy a dream is not in his power, it will scatter like smoke. Ranevskaya can still be comforted, because she, in the end, leaves for Paris. And Lopakhin is left alone, perfectly understanding this. "Goodbye" - that's all he can say to Ranevskaya, and this ridiculous word raises Lopakhin to the level of a tragic hero.

Product test

Lopakhin Ermolai Alekseevich - a wealthy merchant, a native of ordinary peasants (his father was a serf). Lopakhin's father became free after the abolition of serfdom (1861). With a little money, he opened a shop and became rich. Yermolai energetically took up his father's business and significantly increased his wealth. Despite his condition, Lopakhin remained a simple man (he liked to emphasize this).

Lopakhin, has a calculating mind, business acumen and enterprise. He is energetic, and the scope of his activities is much wider than that of the previous masters of life.

From five o'clock he is already on his feet, working from morning till evening and cannot imagine his life without work. An interesting detail - because of his activities, he does not have enough time all the time, some business trips that he goes on are constantly mentioned. This hero in the play looks at his watch more often than others. In contrast to the strikingly impractical Ranevskaya family, he knows the count of both time and money.

Lopakhin loves Ranevskaya and keeps fond memories of her. In a conversation with Dunyasha, he says:

“I remember when I was a boy of fifteen, my deceased father - he was selling in a shop in the village at that time - hit me in the face with his fist, blood started to flow from my nose ... Lyubov Andreevna, as I remember now, was still young, so thin, let me to the washstand, in this very room, in the nursery. "Don't cry, the little man says, he will heal before the wedding ..."

Garden Rescue Plan

Upon learning of her trouble (the cherry orchard does not bring income and Ranevskaya is forced to put it up for sale in order to pay off the debts), Lopakhin proposes a rescue plan. As a true entrepreneur, he finds a way to make the garden profitable. To do this, you need to divide the garden into plots and lease it out for summer cottages. True, the cherry itself will have to be cut down.

Lopakhin, being a practical and a little down-to-earth nature, does not understand the nostalgic feelings that Ranevskaya has for the garden. When she does not agree to do this with the garden dear to them, Lopakhin is surprised at the frivolity and idleness of Ranevskaya and her brother. He himself gets up at 5 am and works until night.

Lopakhin's celebration

At the end of the play, it is Lopakhin who acquires the cherry orchard. This is the moment of his highest triumph: the peasant's son, "illiterate Yermolai", becomes the owner of a noble estate, where his "father and grandfather were slaves." He no longer thinks about the feelings of the former owners of the estate. Joy is bursting out of Lopakhin, he laughs and stomps his feet. His feelings will be expressed in a monologue:

“If my father and grandfather stood up from their graves and looked at the whole incident, how Yermolai bought their estate, which is the most beautiful in the world. I bought an estate where my grandfather and father were slaves, where they were not even allowed into the kitchen ... ".

Having become the owner of the Ranevskaya estate, the new owner dreams of a new life: “Hey, musicians, play, I wish to listen to you! Come all to watch how Yermolai Lopakhin has enough ax in the cherry orchard, how the trees will fall to the ground! We will set up summer cottages, and our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will see a new life ... Music, play! "

The "new master" of life, Lopakhin, personifies the new time. He is the only one who is given to come closer to understanding the essence of the era, but in his life there is no place for real beauty, soulfulness, humanity, because Lopakhin is a symbol of only the present. The future belongs to other people

Lopakhin's quotes

True, my father was a man, but here I am in a white waistcoat and yellow shoes.

Your brother, here is Leonid Andreevich, says about me that I am a boor, I am a fist, but this is absolutely all the same to me. Let him speak. I only wish that you would still believe me, that your amazing, touching eyes would look at me as before. Merciful God! My father was a serf with your grandfather and father, but you, in fact, did so much for me once that I forgot everything and love you like my own ... more than my own.

You are very gentle, Dunyasha. And you dress like a young lady, and your hair too. You can not do it this way. We must remember ourselves.

Yes, time is ticking.

I constantly have money of my own and others', and I see what kind of people are around. You just need to start doing something to understand how few honest, decent people are.

The only wonderful thing about this garden is that it is very large. Cherries are born every two years, and there is nowhere to go, no one buys.

In the spring I sowed a thousand acres of poppy seeds, and now I have earned forty thousand pure. And when my poppy was blooming, what a picture it was! So, I say, I earned forty thousand and, therefore, I offer you a loan, because I can. Why pull your nose? I'm a man ... just.

My dad was a man, an idiot, he did not understand anything, he did not teach me, but only beat me drunk, and all with a stick. In fact, I am the same fool and idiot. I haven't learned anything, my handwriting is bad, I write in such a way that people are ashamed of them, like a pig.

The Cherry Orchard is considered an example of a dramatic classic. Its creation accompanied a turning point in Russian theater and Russian literature. This is a lyrical comedy with a sad aftertaste typical of Chekhov's works.

History of creation

Literary critics believe that the play is autobiographical. The plot of the work is built around a ruined noble family, forced to sell the family estate. Chekhov happened to get into a similar situation, so he knew the experiences of his heroes firsthand. The state of mind of each character was familiar to the writer, as a person faced with the need to leave his home. The narrative is permeated with subtle psychologism.

The novelty of the play was that its characters were not subdivided into positive and negative characters, not into main and secondary characters. These were people of the past, present and future, whom the writer classified according to their worldview. Lopakhin was a representative of the present, although sometimes there is a feeling that he could apply for the position of a man of the future.

Work on the work was carried out from 1901 to 1903. Chekhov was seriously ill, but completed the play, and in 1904 the premiere of a theatrical production based on a new plot took place on the stage of the Moscow Art Theater.

"The Cherry Orchard"

The biography and fate of Ermolai Alekseevich Lopakhin is closely connected with the life of the Ranevskaya family. The hero's father was a serf at Father Ranevskaya and was engaged in petty trade. The young lady showed sympathy for the young man, who every now and then flew in from his father, and he narrates this, recalling the history of life in serfdom. Ranevskaya's attitude excited the mind of Yermolai Lopakhin. He liked the caress of an attractive girl, but he understood that there was a gap between them, based on slavery. Even the meaning of the hero's surname and first name suggests that he is intended for a completely different society.

Lopakhin became rich by becoming a merchant and was able to turn his fate around. He made himself and, in the absence of proper education, got out into the people, which he is incredibly proud of. Although it is admitted that books are empty for him, and the handwriting has not acquired a noble appearance. The former serf achieved everything by hard work, his whole life is in work. Lopakhin is in a hurry all the time, looking at his watch, expecting a new meeting. He knows how to manage his own time and finances, unlike the Ranevskaya family.

Lopakhin repeatedly brings up a conversation about the cherry orchard, offering help. He easily part with the money, lending, but in the case of the estate being sold, something else is involved: Lopakhin loves Ranevskaya. He acts nobly, offering to buy out the garden and rent it out for summer cottages, although he could quietly buy it for his own use.

Lopakhin demonstrates business qualities that are surprising for a former serf. He is practical and calculating, but does not use his talents against those close to him. At the same time, some characters give an impartial characterization of the hero, believing that Lopakhin is pursuing the possibility of a lucrative deal.

Throughout the action, it is repeatedly said about Lopakhin's marriage to Vara. Yermolai does not marry a girl not because of a lack of dowry, but because of the question of cutting down the garden. Varya, however, sees in the groom only a businessman, to whom the wedding can be beneficial as a deal. The incoherent dialogues between the characters make it clear that there is no mutual understanding between them. The love for Ranevskaya, warm in Lopakhin's heart, does not allow him to think about other women. The hero proposes to Varya exclusively at the request of his beloved.

In the play, each character loses something along with The Cherry Orchard. Lopakhin loses faith in love, realizing that the image of a simple peasant is forever entrenched in Ranevskaya's perception. Having bought Ranevskaya's garden from the auction, he, the representative of the future, the owner of the estate, where his family was in service, falls into euphoria. But, having acquired the garden, he did not achieve the fulfillment of his dream, which remained unattainable. Ranevskaya leaves Russia, leaving for Paris, and Lopakhin is left alone with the estate where he spent his youth.

In the finale of the play, Ermolai Alekseevich speaks of an awkward life. It becomes obvious to him that everything that he aspired to turned out to be empty. He realizes how many people in his country exist aimlessly and do not understand why they live.

The author's attitude to Lopakhin is not as negative as that of other characters in the play. Chekhov considers Lopakhin a "fool" and justifies the hero by the lack of education and upbringing. Many of Lopakhin's actions indicate that, despite his business acumen, the man is not distinguished by simple foresight. He is late for the train to meet Ranevskaya. Wanting to help her out of trouble, he buys a garden. Decides to call Varya in marriage and immediately forgets about it.

Lopakhin's image has been incredibly relevant in recent decades. This is a "hero of our time", skillfully building a business, but callous in soul. A person who is incapable of perception and thinks exclusively about his own self-realization through material wealth. Ermolai Lopakhin presents his description of the anti-portrait of Chekhov. A finely feeling writer, whose works are full of philosophical meaning and tragedy, is the complete opposite of the son of serfs who has broken out into people.

Screen adaptations

The first film adaptation of the play by the Russian playwright Chekhov was made in Japan in 1936 by director Morato Makoto. The heroes have been modernized to match the actual Japanese images. In 1959, director Daniel Petri directed the film The Cherry Orchard, in which Martin Hirte played the role of Lopakhin. In the production of Jan Bull in 1973, the image of Lopakhin was absent, and in the Soviet film adaptation of 1976, Yuri Kayurov appeared as a merchant in the television play by Leonid Kheifets.

Richard Aid in 1981 starred Bill Paterson in the role of Lopakhin, and in the Soviet film of Igor Ilyinsky in 1983 he played Yermolai. Anna Chernakova, who shot the film "The Cherry Orchard" 10 years later, invited Lopakhin to the role. The image of the merchant in the television movie Sergei Ovcharov in 2008 went to. He became the most famous performer of this role on the theatrical stage.

Quotes

Lopakhin is colorful by the fact that he does not forget his place. Like any person who has not seen a prosperous life, he is proud of what he managed to achieve without patronage and help. For him, the main expression of success is material wealth:

"My father, it is true, was a man, and here I am in a white vest, yellow shoes."

The hero understands how valuable an education he did not receive in his current position would be. He also feels that he lacks the ability to understand the world he is so eager to get into, where he wants to be accepted as “his own”:

“My dad was a man, an idiot, he didn’t understand anything, he didn’t teach me, he only beat me drunk, and all with a stick. In fact, I am the same fool and idiot. I haven’t learned anything, my handwriting is nasty, I write in such a way that people are ashamed of them, like a pig. ”

Lopakhin's main achievement lies in the fact that he manages to understand: the life he aspires to is worthless. Money does not bring him pleasure. Owning a cherry orchard gives an understanding that his dreams turned out to be empty, the pleasure of their fulfillment is doubtful. Work becomes the main life credo for the hero:

“When I work for a long time, tirelessly, then thoughts are easier, and it seems that I also know why I exist. And how many people in Russia, brother, who exist for an unknown reason. "

One of the central characters in the play by A.P. Chekhov is an enterprising native of the lower classes. Outwardly, it seems that actions do not develop around him, he stands aside from the problem of the work. In fact, everything is completely different. The image and characterization of Lopakhin in the play "The Cherry Orchard" is a brilliant example of the ingenious author's skillful mastery of the word. With short strokes, with insignificant actions, he brings a new class of society out of the shadows.

Character's appearance and origins

Ermolai Alekseevich comes from a poor peasant family. The cruel father beat his son with a stick, did not provide the necessary. Ermolai ran barefoot in the snow, never studied. Serf grandfather and father were "in slavery" by Ranevskaya's parents. Ermolai likes to call himself a "man". By this word he means a whole class of serfs working for the owners. The peasants were not allowed into the house, even into those rooms where the owners were rarely present. From the words of his son, it becomes clear that his father is by profession, by occupation, a merchant in a shop. Perhaps the trading vein of the father grew into the entrepreneurial spirit of his son. At some moments it seems that Lopakhin is not proud, but boasts of his origin. But here, probably, there are mixed feelings. Ermolai Alekseevich is pleased with himself: he managed to acquire an estate that his ancestors could not have dreamed of.

The young merchant is neat in appearance. Strange, but the author does not speak about Lopakhin's age. One can only assume he was somewhere between 30 and 40. He was 15 years old when Ranevskaya was young and thin. What emphasizes the classic in the guise of the character:

• Gentle fingers;
• White vest;
• Yellow shoes.

Modest details, but easy to imagine.

Character of the hero

Lopakhin is shown from different angles. His character allows you to choose the most striking features:

• Hard work: gets up at 5 am and works until late at night.
• Mind: A man with no education is successful in accumulating wealth.
• Modesty: does not refuse peasant origin.
• Self-criticism: Ermolai knows his weaknesses, is not afraid to voice them to others: a fool, an idiot, bad handwriting.

Ermolai Lopakhin is very busy. He does not miss a single opportunity to increase his capital.

Lopakhin can get nasty, so Gaev calls him a fist. The man does not pay attention to such remarks addressed to him, perhaps Gaev is not the person whose words are worth listening to. Trofimov compares Ermolai with a predator. In the plot of the play, the predatory nature is manifested very clearly. Lopakhin "swallowed" the cherry orchard without noticing how much grief he brought to those around him. Moreover, it should be noted that some of them are close to him.

Beliefs and Authorities

Ermolai Alekseevich is not afraid of labor on the ground. Agriculture gives him a good income: sows poppy and gets 40 thousand. He admires nature, but surprisingly only the one that brings profit. Blooming poppy is a beautiful picture. Huge forests, vast fields, deep horizons make Lopakhin's brain work with tripled strength. He represents people as giants who must master all natural gifts. And the merchant does not admire the cherry orchard. He sees in it only areas for summer cottages. The gentle soul of a man is not upset at the thought of the death of the garden. The only great thing about the garden is that it is big. The size is commensurate with the possible income. Delicious aromatic berries are not interesting. They will be born 2 times a year, what to do with them. It is unprofitable even to trade them.

The main belief of the merchant is the importance of money. The more he spins among them, the less he sees decent people. They all seem dishonest, envious and evil to him. It cannot be said that money made Lopakhin a stingy person. HE lends, the classic does not specify the terms of the debt, but not everyone wants to use the merchant's generosity. Peter Trofimov prefers to remain poor, but not a debtor to the merchant. Ranevskaya easily asks for a loan.

Lopakhin and the owners of the cherry orchard

Ermolai has known Ranevskaya since childhood. He treats her with affection. From the hero's remarks, the viewer learns that the owner of the estate did a lot of good for the merchant. Love for a woman as for a loved one, sister, friend. Relationships are confidential. Ermolai wants Ranevskaya to believe him as before. An interesting phrase:

"Sleep well, there is a way out ...",

But when the decision with the garden was made, no proposals were received from Lopakhin to the former owners.

According to some literary scholars, Ermolai Alekseevich loves Ranevskaya more than his own. A bright feeling, a desire to help go through the whole plot, but others believe that for a merchant, love for Lyubov Andreevna ends with the fate of the cherry orchard. He himself chops off what he kept deep in his soul.

Lopakhin and Ranevskaya's adopted daughter

The girl adopted by the family sincerely loves Yermolai. She hopes that Lopakhin is a good soulful person. In a conversation with Lyubov Andreevna, Ermolai does not refuse to marry: "I am not averse to ...". But for more than 2 years, their imaginary connection has only been heard in the air. The merchant avoids Varya, is silent in her presence or jokes. In the last acts of the play, the mother asks Lopakhin to offer his hand and make an offer, to end this problem. There are many contradictions in the word set of Yermolai's monologue:

• I don't understand - to confess;
• There is still time - even now;
• Let's finish - basta;
• Without you, I won't make an offer.

The reader understands that Yermolai is not ready. He hopes that everything will be resolved by itself. Why tie the knot now when there is another joyful event? Acquisition of a cherry orchard opens up new opportunities for a merchant, and love will stop his life. The merchant has no time for feelings, especially since love has no real value.

The success of the entire play depends on the performer of the role of Lopakhin. This is the opinion of the author. The classic in the center of the action puts not the real owners of the garden, but the future owner. The play becomes the starting point of a new life for each hero. Lopakhin is the reason for the changes. His sober look, practicality, business acumen attract the audience.

The plot of the play "The Cherry Orchard" is based on the sale of an estate for debts. This family nest belonged to an aristocratic family, but its owner spent a lot of money abroad, and proper care was not provided for the estate. Although Ranevskaya's daughters tried to live economically, her habits led to losses, and the estate went under the hammer.

The merchant Lopakhin E.A. plays one of the important roles in the play, earlier he was a serf with Ranevskaya's grandfather and father, and was engaged in trade in a shop. By the time described in the play, Lopakhin managed to enrich himself. The character himself is ironic to himself, saying that the man has remained a man. Lopakhin says that his father did not teach him, but only beat him after drinking, therefore he himself, according to his speeches, is "a fool and an idiot", he has a bad handwriting, and did not undergo training.

Characteristics of the hero

Although Lopakhin did not study, he can be called smart, he is also adventurous and has an enviable business acumen.

Also among the main qualities are:

• energy. He is active;
• hardworking. The character plants a poppy and does other work, earning his own labor;
• generous. Easily lends Ranevskaya and other people as much as he can;
• employment. The man constantly checks his watch, gathers or describes himself immediately after returning;
• industrious. Without work, he doesn't know what to do with his hands.

Other participants in the play have different opinions about Lopakhin, Ranevskaya considers him interesting and good, while Gaev says that he is a boor. Simeonov-Pivshchik considers him a man of great intelligence, Petya Trofimov calls him a rich man, and yet he has a positive attitude. He also notes his delicate and obscure soul, gentle fingers, like an artist.

The image of the hero in the play

(A. A. Pelevin— Lopakhin A.A., S.V. Giatsintova— Ranevskaya L.A., V. V. Maruta— Simeonov-Pishchik, Moscow Theater named after Lenin Komsomol, 1954)

It is Lopakhin who is the only active character, and his energy is directed towards making money. The author wrote Lopakhin as a central figure, and refers to people who appreciate art, and not just rake in money. The soul of the artist lives in the hero, he speaks tender words, he was the only one who offered a way out of the situation - the restructuring of the garden. Lopakhin is secretly in love with Ranevskaya, understands the impracticability of the future fate of the estate under the same management, in general, he soberly assesses the situation. As a result, Lopakhin buys the estate at the auction, but still understands the absurdity of his life, he cannot live in harmony with himself.

What message is transmitted through Lopakhin?

(Alexander Savin— Lopakhin A.A., Galina Chumakova— Ranevskaya L.A., Altai Youth Theater , 2016 )

Chekhov loved to look at and show Russia symbolically, investing more in each image. The play poses the question of who the future of the country belongs to. In the history of the play, the words of the heroes almost always diverge from their actions, as Ranevskaya, promising not to return to Paris, leaves, and Lopakhin admires the cherry orchard, but knocks it down.

Lopakhin clearly shows an example of human misunderstanding, in his heart he wanted to be with the landowner, and he was offered the idea of ​​marrying Vara. It broke his heart, and tore his delicate soul. In theory, he came out the winner, because the estate passed into his possession, but the result is tragic, and his feelings remained unrequited.