Why did they change the presenter of the fashion show? Alexey Yagudin and Dmitry Kharatyan acted as hosts of the show “Fashionable Verdict. Format of the program “Fashionable Verdict”

Besides, in this moment Alexander is at the Mosfilm film studio, where filming of programs for the second half of March is in full swing.

In 2007 she appeared on Channel One new transmission, dedicated to style and fashion. “Fashionable Sentence” was loved by both men and women. After all, professionals not only correct mistakes in style, but also help to gain self-confidence. Today you will meet the stylists of the Fashion Court, the presenters of the Fashion Court and the most famous participants!

Format of the program “Fashionable Verdict”

The television project is a court hearing, although not quite an ordinary one. During the process, the manner of dressing and lack of taste are criticized. Most often, defendants are simply unable to find their own image. It is impossible not to say that the main thing in fashion court is the psychological side. After all, usually the presence of problems in a person’s appearance indicates his troubles and problems in life.

Court participants

Relatives or friends of the “defendants” usually turn to “Fashionable Verdict” on Channel One. Usually these are children, other halves, parents. This action looks like in a real court - the case is heard at the trial, the plaintiff is heard (dissatisfied appearance the culprit of the meeting). The prosecution is helping him in this. And the accused of bad taste is supported by the defense. The role of the chairman of the court is played by the presenter of “Fashionable Sentence”.

It is worth noting that almost all participants in the program have never worked on television as presenters. The exception is Arina Sharapova. Perhaps this is why the project became a phenomenal success.

Presenters

The first chairman of the Fashion Sentence court was the famous fashion designer Vyacheslav Zaitsev. He worked on this project from the summer of 2007 to mid-2009. The TV show participants were inspired by his manner of dealing with the “defendants”: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich rarely criticized, he spoke to the heroes of the project gently and good-naturedly.

Unfortunately for the audience, Zaitsev was forced to leave the project, because the life of the famous couturier is full of worries. The creation of new collections, the organization of shows, and even three or four “court hearings” every day simply exhausted the fashion designer. That’s why he recommended a new presenter - Alexander Vasiliev.

Shocking and daring, a real fashion maestro - this is how viewers of “Fashionable Sentence” on Channel One saw Alexander Alexandrovich. This impressive presenter took charge of the project in mid-2009 and temporarily left his post as a fashion judge in the spring of 2017. Despite the caustic comments and defiant behavior, repeatedly helped with advice to the participants of the “Fashionable Sentence”. In addition, the fashion historian is also its legislator. The maestro regularly demonstrates bold images and bright style solutions. Business card Vasiliev became scarves: bright colors, non-standard forms and the combinations changed every issue!

By the way, it was this presenter who managed to explain to the audience that the most important thing in style is individuality. For some time, the presenter was forced to give up working on the show and leave the throne. The fact is that he was actively preparing for a personal exhibition of costumes of the 18th-19th centuries, taking place at the State Historical Museum.

For eight issues, the great couturier was replaced by artist Andrei Bartenev. This fashion designer is primarily known for openly experimenting with the color and shape of outfits. On the project, stylists from “Fashionable Sentence” help him with this. He appears on television in very shocking costumes, completely different from clothes in the usual sense.

Special Issues

To participate in one of special issues Valentin Yudashkin was invited to the program. It happened on July 30, 2010 - the program’s birthday. In 2011, Denis Simachev, an artist and fashion designer, became the host of “Fashionable Sentence”.

Prosecutor

The permanent accuser of the fashion TV project is fashion expert Evelina Khromchenko. In addition to participating in this program, she heads L’Officiel magazine. Very aptly, but at the same time very correctly, she explained to the heroes of “Fashionable Sentence” simple rules. By the way, in 2011 Khromchenko took 23rd place in the overall ranking of 50 popular Russian TV presenters and 10 among female presenters.

Evelina herself explains: the main thing in her work is not to criticize a person, but to explain to him as tactfully as possible how exactly he can improve his life.

Defenders

On the “Fashionable Sentence” project, defenders, or rather, defenders, were repeatedly changed. The first was Arina Sharapova. She was unique" good fairy”, always taking the side of the accused. Arina repeatedly repelled the bold attacks of the prosecution.

Changed it pop singer Nadezhda Babkina. A very positive, friendly defender instilled confidence and self-love in the characters of the TV show. She did it in a kind of family way, very softly.

One of the most restrained defenders at the “Fashionable Verdict” is Larisa Verbitskaya. Even in incredibly emotional moments, she manages to maintain a sternness that her colleagues cannot boast of. At the same time, her comments are always to the point, clear and interesting. The same can be said about the outfits of this defender: laconic and discreet, they always contain a twist.

It is worth noting that Larisa Rubalskaya, Anzhelika Varum, Larisa Dolina, Daria Dontsova, Larisa Guzeeva and Slava took part as defenders in the fashion court.

Stylists at Fashion Sentence

The most difficult work falls on the shoulders of stylists. TV show specialists remain behind the scenes, but at the same time they are literally between two fires: they must take into account the wishes of all parties to the process. But as a result of this hard work, viewers can see completely new people - stylish, bright and confident.

So who are these people who are the stylists of “Fashionable Sentence”? She leads a team of professionals. She has the power to unravel a person, to open the heroes’ eyes to themselves.

Currently, six pairs of stylists are working on the program. Among them are Yulia Nechaeva, Ekaterina Kondakova.

The new host of the “Fashionable Sentence” program, Andrei Bartenev, told why fashion historian Alexander Vasiliev needed a replacement. According to the designer, he really enjoyed taking part in the filming.

“The program that we recently filmed will be aired on March 1. It was with great pleasure that I met with my old friends Evelina Khromchenko and Nadezhda Babkina, and once again admired their professionalism, heroism, resilience and health. Because in order to present” Fashionable verdict", you need to be very healthy person– not only mentally, but also physically,” Bartenev explained to the correspondent website.

ON THIS TOPIC

Andrey emphasized that he used to often watch the program with the participation of Alexander Vasiliev. “Even then I had thoughts that something needed to be changed in it. I didn’t like the scenery, I would have changed the music, but it turned out that we were dealing with such a well-worn blockbuster that changing any detail would mean killing the audience’s interest ", shared the new presenter.

The fashion judge admitted that he carefully prepared for the shoot. “The producers told me that they would like to see me as a presenter when I was on a business trip. I packed a whole suitcase of classic English suits, thought that the audience was used to seeing me in bright clothes, and decided to surprise them. However, the producers said: “No, no, we need you exactly like this! Bring back your bright suits!

The artist added that viewers will see only eight episodes of the program with his participation - then Alexander Vasiliev will return to the presenter’s chair. “Now he is preparing for his exhibition of costumes of the 18th – 19th centuries, as soon as it is completed, he will again become the presenter,” Andrey noted.

Hello, subscribers and those passing by. Today I’m reviewing the show “Fashionable Sentence,” which has been airing on Channel One for several years now. I’ve been wanting to write for a long time, but somehow I never got around to it and there was no reason, but here there are two of them at once. The first is the first day of spring, March 1st! Hurray, we're exhausted. I congratulate everyone on this. The second reason is the new presenter Andrei Bartenev, who replaced fashion historian Alexander Vasiliev in this post. Even if the replacement is short-lived - only for 2 weeks, while the fashion guru is preparing an exhibition in Moscow, but still this event is out of the ordinary and signals that not everything is in order in the fashion kingdom.

The structure of the program “Fashionable Sentence” became ossified many years ago and cosmetic changes are periodically made to it. Sometimes there are more serious interventions. Unfortunately, the 2017 version of the “Fashion Sentence” has little to do with fashion. Discussion fashion trends and trends, shows with elderly models, excursions into fashion and even shopping in a clothing store - everything is a thing of the past. Now “Fashionable Sentence” is a tongue-lashing for an hour, like in any other talk show on the First, and at the very end of the episode there are two transformations - a demonstration of the heroine’s old wardrobe and a show of the stylists’ work, and before that there are 40-50 minutes of cries from the husband or other relatives and the heroine's colleagues, lamentations about fate, tears and turning dirty panties inside out.

The “fashionable verdict” rests on three pillars: Evelina Khromchenko, who knows how to analyze problems with style in detail and give clear recommendations, Nadezhda Babkina, who knows how to choose the right words in everyday terms, and the host-toastmaster Alexander Vasiliev. All three have been sitting in their chairs for a long time and it’s time for everyone to move on. Evelina Khromchenko’s participation in “Fashionable Verdict” is a huge step back and stagnation in her career. Publicity is good and beneficial, but why throw pearls before swine? The morning audience of Channel One and the world of fashion are two non-intersecting planes. All her advice and comments are, of course, valuable, but for some reason, after her transfer, models that meet the requirements of fashion and good taste do not appear in clothing markets. Cheap clothes will always look cheap and shabby, since clothes are an indicator of the status of the wearer. No one will sell a fashionable style for 100 rubles. For 100 rubles they will specially make the ugliest design so that you can see a beggar woman walking over there from a kilometer away. Even Yudashkin in his collection for Faberlic charged the price for a skirt (judging by the advertisement) to one and a half thousand. Chinese Faberlic for one and a half grand! Go crazy.

Nadezhda Babkina - she definitely suits to sit on the jury. I don’t know what’s going on with her concerts and who generally listens to her songs and goes to her concerts. It's definitely not me. She doesn’t release hits, she doesn’t make videos. The rare performances that I catch on TV make me immediately switch to another channel. Here’s the thing: I like Babkina as a person, despite the fact that she is a confidant of you-know-who, but I would never listen to her songs. Before Babkina, Larisa Verbitskaya sat in the same place. This was quiet horror. How could a professional presenter be unable to connect two words without prompting and last in the defender’s chair for 6 years? Thank God it was removed in the end.

Alexander Vasiliev... It seems that at first he came to the “Fashionable Verdict” for fun, and then he was drawn in. This is better than sitting anonymously in Paris among the dusty rubbish that he bought at flea markets, but you also need to know honor. In fact, he says the same words in each episode - only the jokes and banter towards the heroines of the program differ. It seems to me that if he could choose the heroes of the program, he would not have allowed all these freaks with sad destinies to air on Channel One.

Am I glad that Vasilyev was replaced, albeit for two weeks? Yes. The artist Andrey Bartenev is no less famous than Alexander Vasiliev and is no worse than Khabalite. He’ll sit there for a week and make it so hot—mama, don’t worry. They write on the Internet that they would like to see the evil pug Lisovets in the presenter’s chair. Well, I do not! Who is Lisovets? A name and nothing more. Celebrity became famous thanks to TV, and not because of his work. Vasiliev is a fashion historian and has written many books. Bartenev is an avant-garde artist with a name. Everything is correct, IMHO. I would generally introduce rotation of the central seat into the rule.

The heroes of the show are a separate conversation. 99% of the episodes are with women and very rare programs where they dress up as men. My aunt’s work colleague took part in the “Fashionable Verdict” a long time ago. She said that all the problems that the heroines broadcast from the podium are complete fiction, fantasy. They need to somehow justify their appearance on the show. Nobody gives the wardrobe that stylists select for heroines to anyone - everything has to be returned. I also read on the Internet revelations from owners of clothing stores and boutiques that they sincerely hate the stylists of Channel One, since they always return the clothes they bought. It's a shame, of course, that famous show cannot afford to give Demshan things to heroes who have been used far and wide. And yes, it’s very infuriating that the presenters always say “I’m putting on/dressing” correctly, but the characters are extremely incorrect - they’re always “dressing” and no one corrects them.

I’m not a fashion expert and generally wear the same clothes for years, but I still have a sense of beauty. And sometimes I’m just shocked by how stylists disfigure the heroines of the show. In fact, there is one visual-psychological trick here. The main transformation that stylists make is not in changing clothes, but in applying the right makeup and creating a normal hairstyle on the head. The “before” version of the heroines is a quiet horror, mainly because of the bullshit that’s going on in their heads. Unwashed, unkempt - everything looked as if it had just come out of the forest. Another option is freaks, but they are less common. Basically, these are unwashed, unkempt, shapeless village women. Body shapes cannot be changed in 1-2 hours of stylists’ work, just as a sense of style cannot be instilled, so they change their hairstyle, and, as it seems to me, any clothes will go well with a good hairstyle. Yes, I have general principles- so that the clothes do not fit too tightly around saggy boobs and a fat butt, so that the top of the clothes covers the nurse, you cannot wear a black bra under a white blouse, etc., but 90% of success is still on the head and, as a result, in the head. It seems to me that the program would benefit significantly if they showed how stylists work with patients, otherwise now it’s just some kind of WHAM! and the beauty came out. What did you do, how did you do it, what principles did you use to select outfits and style? It is obvious that they dress everyone with the same brush - a wealthy woman with a slight extra. After the end of the program, for some reason they don’t give a million dollars to the account so that the proposed style can be maintained. And even if all the things were actually donated, I can’t imagine how these ladies would flaunt in chic outfits along the dirty roads in their villages and towns with knee-deep mud, where everyone wears quilted jackets and rubber boots.

It really upsets me that people are ready to make public (albeit not seriously, as it turns out) accusations against each other, promises to divorce, etc. If they told me this even as a joke, I would be left with a trace of sincere resentment for a long time, if not forever. When a loved one is ready to utter terrible and shameful words to the whole country, it means there has been no smell of love there for a long time. Calculation, self-interest, ambition - whatever. After the “Fashionable Sentence” you can safely file for divorce, IMHO. Before participating in “Fashionable Verdict,” the program’s heroes need to make an important decision - what is more important to them: relationships or five minutes of fame. Many choose fame and put on a show on Channel One, where all that is missing is a fight. Television corrupts people, makes them go against themselves, makes them deceive the audience. The heroes' karma suffers from this - I'm 100% sure. People, don't go to such deceitful programs. Then it will come back to haunt you! Alisovika from “Tomboys” also asked her husband to beat her on camera, and now they (in her own words) no longer live together. And don’t forget that the word is not a sparrow and “betrayal” of yourself and your relationship will forever remain recorded on video. This too should not be forgotten.

A separate category of experts in the “Fashionable Verdict” are pop, theater, film and TV stars who came to mock the poor clothes of the heroines. Here you can immediately see who is experienced and wise, and who is narrow-minded. Wise stars unconditionally support the heroines and say that everything suits them, no matter what they wear - this way they earn +100 to their karma and their popularity. Narrow-minded starlets zealously criticize and mock the heroines, taking the side of the accusation. After all, “Fashionable Sentence” is a popular show, and after all, you have to bend your heart and hide your essence, otherwise streams of dirt will fall on social media, and then no one will come to the premiere of the play or to the concert. The role of a star expert was created not for criticism, but for PR, and not everyone understands this. Some stars, by the way, would do well to transform themselves before dispensing advice. For example, Tatyana Bulanova spoke in the first issue of “Fashionable Sentence”. I love her as an artist, but listening to fashion advice and criticism from her performance... uh... A shoemaker without boots, as they say. People with an impeccable sense of style should be invited to be celebrity experts, and not those who can dress up normally every once in a while or less often.

What disappoints me most about “Fashionable Verdict” is not the complete rejection of fashion and not the ossification of the format, but... the advertising that is pushed in the program. Until recently, Alexander Vasiliev advertised suitcases with DeSheli, for example. Now we have switched to "Horsepower". There’s something I don’t understand - why are advertising ordered exclusively by companies with a dubious reputation, while celebrities sign up for it? Where are L'Oreal-Paris, Avoni and Prastichosspadi Arichleymy?

Well, I’ll end on a positive note, although 5 years have passed since that event. year 2012. Release of "Fashionable Sentence" with... lesbians ( link to legal online viewing). What a success it was! That episode of “Fashionable Verdict” showed that they are not there just for the money. It's no secret that mostly LGBT people work in the fashion and beauty industry. And it is very strange that in a program about fashion this topic was carefully hushed up and is still being hushed up. Everyone sees everything, everyone understands everything, but you can’t pronounce or talk about it. Funny! By the way, the next day after the broadcast, that episode was removed from the Channel One website and it remained only on the official website of the Fashionable Sentence.

Here's another question I have for you, dear readers. Have you figured out the secret to filming a show where the heroine transforms in a matter of minutes? It is clear that the process takes for a long time, but the presenters don’t sit and wait for the stylists to work a miracle. As far as I know, “Fashionable Verdict” is filmed in blocks of several episodes a day. I suspect that episodes are filmed exactly until the heroine goes backstage for a makeover, and then the presenters run to change clothes and film the next episode exactly until that same moment. And so on, until transformations happen and the endings are filmed, again with the presenters changing clothes. Do you think so too or is the shooting technology still different?

I give the show “Fashionable Sentence” three stars and, unfortunately, I cannot recommend watching it, because the further it goes, it becomes simpler and worse in terms of filling and presentation. “Fashionable sentence” is not developing, but is steadily degrading and will soon become obsolete, since all that is left of fashion in it are horns and legs and the meaning of the program has been reduced to empty talk about life. And yes, I don't believe that problems can be solved with new hairstyle and clothes.

“Fashionable Verdict” airs from Monday to Friday at 11 am on Channel One. All issues and much more can be found on the official website of the Modny-TV project .

Thank you for your positive ratings and comments!

My other reviews: Movies | Cartoons | TV series | TV show| Cosmetics | Food

Sincerely, Andy Goldred