My impressions of the novel fathers and sons. Fathers and Sons, Ivan Turgenev - "I re-read Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons": heroes, meaning, love line in the novel and my impressions."

This novel is from the school curriculum. Never distinguished by diligence, for some reason I read this novel and I confess, it left an indelible mark on my heart ... When I read the last lines, I could not resist: tears kept coming. I remember sitting down and crying heartily)) it was a pity for young Bazarov and poor parents ...

I like the style of the novel. Turgenev very accessible, intelligibly and interestingly describes all the events taking place in the novel, while reading the novel, pictures of life involuntarily appear before your eyes, a model of relations in the society of that time looms ... "Fathers and Sons" is taken separately more than realistic story of one family. Nothing super new. just people different generation suddenly "sezhzhatsya" and face eternal problems. The appearance of Bazarov in the Kirsanovs' house is like a catalyst in order to sharpen the eye on the problem of the views of different generations.

I don't want to talk much about the already common name of the problem "fathers and sons". everyone knows it, everyone has encountered it at least once. "Children" run ahead of the fathers for progress, forgetting traditions, and the "fathers" stubbornly refuse to use the novelties of this progress and change their views that have developed over the years. In general, this topic is always relevant. The fact that now everything is an innovation, special scientific nature, gadgets, we accept as progress, then in the 18-19 centuries, even new views that were different from the traditional ones were akin to this very progress.

The author shows how Russia is changing, how such “Bazarovs” are capable, albeit partially, of modifying the views of their environment. Even if, Arkaky, his comrade, nevertheless moved away from nihilistic thoughts, because he was too "Soft and liberal barchina", but he moved away, but his thoughts were still renewed (he became a wonderful manager of his estate and household) ... and the Elder Brother Nikolai Petrovich, who at first received the new guest with hostility, after a demonstrative duel, suddenly gained respect for him and considered that Bazarov was not such a bad person ... I just want to say: "The renewal of" brains "is going on at the right pace ..." . if it is sharper, then there will be a revolution, and so the people mature and quietly come to a new one, more meaningfully, having matured, so to speak. Keeping traditions and new thinking in the right proportions.

Bazarov, like a bright flash, like a bolt from the blue, appeared brightly, "brainwashed" as best he could and disappeared ... Everyone thinks that he is really an ardent nihilist who denies all power and traditions, but it turns out that in his soul he quite a romantic young man. These new thoughts, mental anguish haunt him: what he denied, what he taught everyone, suddenly turns out to be in him (tender feelings, romance, sentimentality) and he can’t do anything about it ... How painfully Bazarov perceives the refusal of Odintsova, who, like him, easily refuses him and denies his feelings ...

On the example of the main character, he is on both sides of the barricade. Conflicting thoughts, the realization of hopelessness, when he cannot control himself and his thoughts and feelings devastate this person, and due to inattention and absent-mindedness, he dies very stupidly ... And only old decrepit parents remember him and come to him every time ... and for others, he remained a bright flash, a spot ....

On the example of this small and quite ordinary family reflects the mood of society. People's worldview is changing: the more active and daring, driven by their ideas, break forward, bending the weaker ones under them. But even the strongest and most daring always have a weak spot, because there are no invulnerable ones. No matter how Bazarov mocked traditions, no matter how ardent a nihilist he considered himself, meeting with a woman who aroused real feelings in him changed not only his views, but also his life, which he had to rethink.

And the conflict between generations has always been and will be. Children are the engines of progress, and parents are the keepers of traditions. This is how the world works harmoniously. It's just the law social development without which there is no progress, no evolution...

Once again, walking between the shelves of the city library, I realized that I did not want to waste time on detective stories, love stories or modern bestsellers. I wanted something Russian, thoughtful, and I went to the classics. Wandering my eyes through the books, I stopped at Turgenev and realized that I didn’t remember at all what the work “Fathers and Sons”, which we once went through school curriculum. I only remember that I didn’t really understand it, and then it seemed to me terribly boring.

This time the book was read from cover to cover, including a review of this work by Pisarev called "Bazarov".

I don’t know why, but I want to know more and more how people lived before, when there were no TVs, computers and slow cookers. Moreover, it was after this work that I wanted to read Russian history written in those days. I'll ask Karamzin next time in the library.

The plot of "Fathers and Sons"

The work begins with the fact that the old father (Nikolai Kirsanov) meets his student son (Arkady Kirsanov) on the road.

But it turns out that Arkasha is not traveling alone, but with a friend - Evgeny Bazarov. Arkasha is under his great influence, looks into his mouth, considers him his teacher, but Bazarov is not to the taste of his relatives, especially his aristocratic uncle Pavel Kirsanov.

On the basis of the disagreement between the views of the youth and the views of the older generation, a conflict eventually occurs. External - between Bazarov and Kirsanov, and internal - in the soul of Bazarov. After all, he, such an unprincipled "nihilist", managed to ... fall in love. Yes, to whom! To a lady who will give him a head start in his unscrupulousness!

How will this story end? I won’t spoil it, I’ll just say that there will be no sweetness and vanilla.

The main characters of "Fathers and Sons" by Turgenev

And yet, I want to introduce readers to the main characters and even show them thanks to the illustrations from the book.

• Evgeny Bazarov

In my opinion, this person can be respected only for one quality - incredible performance. The future doctor, he is already studying daily natural Sciences, in practice and in theory. He can already provide quality medical care. Bazarov grew up in modest conditions, but as a child he had everything he needed. I would like to note the fact that during the training, Eugene did not burden his parents, did not ask them for money.

Bazarov does not recognize authorities, spits on customs and mores, but this would be nothing if he were not rude to people. Sometimes he seems to me just an ill-mannered person who covers up his cultural gaps with a philosophy of nihilism. He does not understand music and art, and therefore denies them. He has never loved, therefore he denies love. He squeamishly calls light feelings like friendship and love "romance" or "nonsense." He is rude to people, openly calls his friends fools and keeps them close to him as a retinue of admirers. The conflict in his soul occurs when he falls in love. His system of views breaks down, and now he, dumbfounded, notices behind him that he, too, is becoming a romantic. And in this regard, he tries to escape.

Perhaps she is much worse than Bazarov. This is a very smart and prudent woman who did not disdain a wedding with an old man for the sake of inheriting his fortune. Now she lives with his wealth: effeminate, bored, having no meaning in life. But when she gets to know Bazarov, she becomes interested: what kind of bird is so interesting?

At the end of the work, it seemed to me that Anna would thaw when she saw Bazarov, but no. She came only to make sure of her frigidity, the absence of feelings.

Arkady Kirsanov and Katerina Odintsova

Arkady Kirsanov is a very gentle, kind and romantic person. For the last six months, he has been fascinated by the ideas of Bazarov, but his inner nature is rebelling against these very ideas. And we will recognize him in the end as a man of the old school: he loves to listen to music, dream, be jealous, he is capable of love, tenderness, compliments. At the same time, he is honest and open to people.

Katia, younger sister Anna, - a man with a rod. She is soft, beautiful, but knows how to bend her line and subjugate. Katya is not spoiled by life.

• Pavel Kirsanov

This is the antagonist of Bazarov. The man is aristocratic, bilious, but for me - nothing of himself. Yes, he is educated, smart, educated, but his life was in vain. True, and he did an act worthy of respect. He fell in love, but abandoned his love for the benefit of a loved one.

• bauble

This character is a mystery to me. Personally, I thought it was a wolf in sheep's clothing. Now she is so sweet, submissive, kind, open, fearful and simple. But so far she is NOBODY. But there is a marriage with a nobleman ahead, and how she will show herself is still unknown. Why do I doubt her? She behaved too freely with Bazarov, I would say that she herself provoked him. Perhaps in the future she will become very similar to Anna Odintsova, because she does not marry a peer, but a person who is suitable for her father.

• Bazarov's parents

I can only sympathize with these characters. They raised a bastard who wanted to spit on everyone and everything. I'm just sorry for the old people.

But they loved Bazarov more than anyone else in the world.

Love in the novel by I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"

The book shows us 2 types of love.

Lyubov Bazarova - furious, tough, passionate. When he showed his feelings, even Odintsova became unwell, scared.

Arkasha's love is soft, compliant, spiritual. This is the case when friendship and mutual understanding first appear, and then a feeling of love.

It is from the second kind of love that strong marriages are formed. I believe that such relationships are not boring. Thanks to them, you go home like a fortress, and do not wait - what kind of tsunami awaits you tonight.

The meaning of the novel Fathers and Sons by I.S. Turgenev

In my opinion, I.S. Turgenev wanted to tell the reader the following.

Yes, there will always be a difference in views between the generation of fathers and children. And there is nowhere to go from this. The world is developing. But there are immutable principles that will allow father and child to understand each other. First of all, it is love. Love is that feeling that helps lovers to compromise, put up with shortcomings, which will close your mouth when you need to remain silent in order to avoid quarrels and resentment, which will endow you with eloquence when you need to support each other with words.

It is the feeling of love that will provide a sick parent with a glass of water in old age.

And yes, if you have read this far, now is the time to call your parents and just say a few kind words to them.

The central place in Turgenev's novel Fathers and Sons is occupied by Evgeny Vasilievich Bazarov. All the attention of the novel is focused on it. Bazarov is the son of a district doctor, a nihilist who studied the exact sciences and medicine. The father could not fully provide for his son, and therefore Bazarov himself was forced to make his way to the people. The hard student life, life with small penny work, did not indulge Bazarov and gave severity to his face. My first impression of Bazarov was not one of pleasant ones, it even caused some kind of neglect for him, his appearance distinguished him from other people, from the gray mass. Tall, long hoodie with tassels. A long and thin face with a broad forehead, a flat top, a pointed nose, large greenish eyes and drooping sandy whiskers, it expressed self-confidence and intelligence. Separate features, such as a robe with tassels, a broad forehead, a pointed nose, a persistent and condescending smile, showed and emphasized his vanity and extraordinary self-confidence. Bazarov had good reputation in society, he made himself an excellent career. He broke through his career with his head, his wonderful mind, and not with low bows and the intercession of an important uncle. Bazarov is distinguished by his great intelligence and, as a result, makes a strong impression on people who encounter him. He defines a real person. A real person, he says, is one about whom there is nothing to think about, but whom one must obey or hate. Bazarov himself fits the definition of a real person; he makes an impression on those around him: he intimidates and repels some, subjugates others. As a remarkably intelligent man, he did not meet his equal. When I meet a man who would not give in to me, he said with emphasis, then I will change my mind about myself. Bazarov is a proud and proud person. He looks down on people and rarely hides his half-contemptuous, half-protective attitude towards those who hate him and those who obey him. He never loved anyone, he never needed anyone, he was not afraid of anyone, and therefore he spared no one. I do not understand how you can live without paying attention to anyone. Bazarov, everywhere and in everything, does as he pleases or as it seems to him advantageous and convenient. It is controlled only by personal whim or personal calculations. As Pisarev said: Bazarov does not recognize any regulator, any moral law, any principle, neither under himself, nor outside himself, nor within himself. Bazarov's ironic attitude to rashness, to romanticism, works of art literature, art, to lyrical impulses turns into deep cynicism. But along with all his shortcomings, Bazarov is a very strong nature, a noble and true person, somewhere even sincere: he treats people the way he perceives them, if he likes a person, then he likes it sincerely, without a second thought, if not, then no, but also sincerely. Bazarov is an image that brings together all the qualities that, bit by bit, were in all the advanced and progressive people of his time.

I had a desire to apologize (I don’t know - to Bazarov? to Turgenev?) for the stupid first reading and those first impressions that I wrote about. Where I saw one confusion in views, I saw the amazing strength and consistency of a person who makes mistakes, "grabs over the edge", but seeks. Yesterday, leafing through a textbook, I came across the words that Tolstoy said about himself, but, in my opinion, they are very suitable for people like Bazarov: “You have to fight, make mistakes, fall and get up again, but calmness - mental meanness. It seemed to me that Bazarov was indifferent to everything beautiful. He loved, and truly loved. This feeling gave birth to another person in him, whom Bazarov himself did not notice in himself. How he wanted to snatch this love from himself! And he couldn’t, because he was a very strong person, which means that he fell in love very strongly and forever.

"...Freedom, about which the government is busy..." - isn't there any hope in these words for reform as for real liberation? And is there any disdain for the people in the words about peasant drunkenness? There is neither one nor the other, at least for the reader who reads the text without prejudice. The word "freedom" in relation to the ongoing reform (let's not forget - the action of the novel takes place in 1859) was common both among the peasants and among the advanced intelligentsia, no matter how the very possibility of freedom was regarded. Here is evidence from N. A. Nekrasov’s poem “Village News” (1860):

Converges in my hut. more yes more people: - Well, speak quickly, What have you heard about freedom?

And about the reform, which had already taken place, terribly disappointing the lyrics, he still found it possible to write the poem “Freedom” (1861): I know: in place of the networks of serfs, People came up with many others, Yes, but it’s easier for the people to unravel them. Muse! hopefully welcome freedom!

It is just as difficult to hear the approval of the reform in Bazarov's words as in Nekrasov's poetry. In addition, the whole replica of the hero is angry and ironic. And in his attitude to peasant drunkenness, Bazarov is an obvious like-minded person of Dobrolyubov (article "People's Affairs", 1859) and Nekrasov, who saw sworn enemies of people's freedom in the tavern and vodka. Soon after Turgenev's lessons, ninth graders will study the poem "Who Lives Well in Russia", they will read the chapter from it "Drunk Night" ...

So, it turns out that the author of Fathers and Sons is being reproached for departing from historical truth where he strictly follows it. Similar reproaches about other passages in the novel are no more grounded. They are spawned known period development of the science of literature and are the result of inattention to a specific, irreplaceable public role verbal art, capable - in the best creations - of breaking through any obstacles to the truth of life.

According to Pisarev, Pechorin's temperament is characteristic of Bazarov, Pechorin's mental strength. And in general, he appears in a series of a whole gallery of "smart people" - the Onegins, the Pechorins, the Belᴛᴏʙs, the Rudins. These are people who do not want to live the life of those hundreds of thousands of "indivisible", (atoms) that have never "used their brain as an instrument of independent thinking" and who "lived happily ever after".

“Smart people” have always been bored, sad, even yearned for an unsatisfied desire to act, to be useful.

But now new type such people. Now " smart people It became clear that yearning is not enough? that happiness cannot be begged for, it must be won. Unfortunately, they do not yet see a way to do this. “In practical terms, they are just as powerless as Rudin, but they have become aware of the demolition of powerlessness and have ceased waving their hands. “I can’t act now,” each of these new people thinks to himself, “I won’t even try; I despise everything that surrounds me, and I will not hide this contempt

I will fight evil when I feel strong.” The Bazarovs, according to the critic, are not loafers at all. On the contrary, unlike their predecessors, they are working proletarians, they are forced to earn a living. But their main advantage lies elsewhere. “The Pechorins have a will without knowledge, the Rudins have knowledge without a will; Bazarov has both knowledge and will. Thought and deed merge into one solid whole. The case of the Bazarovs is precisely the critical work of thought carried out by a highly developed, completely independent personality, free from any superstition, authority, accepted norms.

The critic is undoubtedly right when he speaks of Bazarov's independence. But do the heroes really have any moral laws, principles, and integrity? It's true, he doesn't put them on display, he remains silent in response to Pavel Petrovich's direct question, tells Arkady that he acts in one way or another "because of the feeling" that his "brain is so arranged." Let's remember the fight between Evgeny Bazarov and Pavel Kirsanov. Is it possible that behind the denial there are no ideals, no convictions? “My grandfather plowed the land,” says Bazarov, “with arrogant pride.” It is important to understand that it is important for him not only as an argument in the dispute that he, rather than Pavel Petrovich, is recognized as "his compatriot." Bazarov despises "aristocrats", that is, people who boast of rights received not by personal merit, but by inheritance. True, Bazarov himself wants to go against his people - against their ignorance, drunkenness, superstition, patriarchal obedience. Isn't it clear that the true democratic ideals of the hero are behind all this?

Page 1 from 1

The events take place in the prince's chamber in 1030. In one of the chambers (in the gallery) monks sit - scribes of books: monk-artist Nikita, who draws headpieces and miniatures for books, monk-scribe Svichkogas, hieromonk Sylvester, who directs all work. Everyone is waiting for the return of Prince Yaroslav from Chud, where he fought. Sylvester urges scribes: ...

On the high bank of the Volga there is a city garden. Every day a local self-taught watchmaker Kuligin comes here, looks at the Volga and can't get enough of it. And today he is on his favorite bench. He is talking with Vanya Kudryash, a dashing guy, a clerk of the richest local merchant - Savel and Prokofievich Diky. Curly is bored with Kuligin's enthusiasm: well, it's beautiful, well, so what? Nearby they notice the owner of Kudryash, Dikiy, who reprimands his nephew Boris Grigorievich. - A poignant man! Curly smiles...

"The Life of Archpriest Avvakum" - the first autobiographical work Russian literature, in which Archpriest Avvakum himself spoke about himself and his long-suffering life. Speaking of the work of Archpriest Avvakum, A.N. Tolstoy wrote: “These were ingenious“ life ”and“ messages ”of the rebel, frantic Archpriest Avvakum, who completed literary activity terrible torture and execution in Pustozersk. Avvakum's speech is all about gesture, the canon is shattered, you physically feel the presence of the narrator, his gestures, his voice. Conclusion Having studied poetics individual works ancient Russian literature, we made a conclusion about the features of the genre of life. Life is a genre of ancient Russian literature that describes the life of a saint. V this genre there are different hagiographic types: life-martyria (a story about martyrdom saint) monastic life (a story about everything life path righteous man, his piety, asceticism, miracles performed by him, etc.

Phenomenon I Gr. Prostakova, examining Mitrofan's new caftan, scolds Trishka for having restrained and ruined the thing. She sends Eremeevna for a tailor, and Mitrofan for her father. Phenomenon II Prostakov, calling Trishka "cattle" and "thieves' mug", scolds him for the spoiled caftan. Trishka justifies himself: he is self-taught. To this, Prostakova replies that the first tailor also did not study with anyone. To which Trishka brilliantly objects: - Yes, the first tailor, perhaps, sewed worse than mine. Phenomenon III Prostakov scolds her husband that he is hiding from her, and asks to resolve the dispute about the caftan ....

E. Gutsalo was born in one of the villages in the Vinnitsa region in a family of teachers. Graduated from the Nizhyn Pedagogical Institute named after N. V. Gogol. He worked as a journalist in various editorial offices, in the publishing house " Soviet writer". Prose writer, poet, screenwriter. Author of several books of poetry, many collections of short stories, novels, novels (People Among People, Apples from the Autumn Garden, Bathed in Lovage, Dead Zone, Kindred Fire, School Bread, Borrowed Man ”, “Parade of planets”, etc.). He wrote a lot for children (“Horses flew by”, “In the stork village”, “Sayora”, “Deniska”, “Yellow present”, etc.). Winner of the Y. Yanovsky Prize and State Prize named after T. G. Shevchenko. His works have been translated into many languages ​​of the world and are known far beyond the borders of Ukraine. It is a great happiness for a person to enjoy the benefits of nature, to enjoy its beauty. It would seem that life is beautiful everywhere. But where does cruelty, heartlessness, meanness come from then?...

Student's essayGrade 10 NP DVOK "Penates" Makievsky Chiara(Head Berezkina Yulia Vladimirovna)

“What questions does the novel by I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons"?

Roman I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons", first published in 1862, became a landmark for its time. The work made a strong and ambiguous impression on readers, however, the image of the protagonist Yevgeny Bazarov was perceived for the most part young people as an example to follow, because the ideals of the youth of those times were perfectly reflected in the worldview of the protagonist. In his novel I.S. Turgenev managed to reflect the main socio-political problems of Russia in 1853-1861. And yet, the novel "Fathers and Sons" attracts me not only with the accurately conveyed atmosphere of Russia, which is on the verge of reforms, but also with a number of moral and philosophical problems raised by the author.

One of the main problems of the work lies in its title. This is the problem of the relationship between parents and children, the gap between generations, differences of opinion. The problem of "fathers and sons" is an age-old problem that arises before people from generation to generation. In the novel "Fathers and Sons" this problem is especially clearly revealed on the example of the eternal disputes and disagreements between Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov and Evgeny Bazarov. Pavel Petrovich is the real antipode of Bazarov. Pavel Petrovich is a typical representative of the aristocracy of those times, a nobleman by birth. Yevgeny Bazarov proudly talks about his simple origin: “My grandfather plowed the land ...” Bazarov appreciates practicality, prefers to think rationally, denying art, creativity, spirituality: “Raphael is not worth a penny.” The practicality of Bazarov is manifested even in his appearance: “Bazarov was extremely simple: he never busted up. He said what he thought. He dressed simply, even to some extent, old-fashioned: a hoodie with tassels, a hat with large brim. But this did not bother him, he wore what is and what is convenient, he did not care about fashion. Pavel Petrovich, a romantic and a conservative, could not understand Bazarov. Even life in the village did not affect his reverent attitude towards appearance. Pavel Petrovich has always been considered handsome man: "From childhood, Pavel Petrovich was distinguished by his beauty, was a little mocking and somehow amusingly bilious - he could not help but like him." Pavel Petrovich was unable to understand and accept nihilism, which is a certain principle of Bazarov's life, he preferred science fiction. Under the nihilist understood a person who does not respect anything and no one. Both Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov were quite radical in their views, they absolutely did not want to take into account each other's arguments, each remained with his own opinion. In chapter 24 of the novel, the conflict of generations, namely the conflict between Bazarov and Pavel Petrovich, reaches its climax.

Nikolai Petrovich and Arkady are not so categorical in their convictions, but they also support different sides in this dispute.

Despite the obvious differences between Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov, they have a lot in common, one can even argue that they are quite similar. Both of them are not subject to other people's influences, and only experienced and felt by them themselves makes the heroes change their views on some issues. Both the democrat Bazarov and the aristocrat Kirsanov have a huge influence on those around them, and neither one nor the other can be denied strength of character.

The conflict of "fathers and sons" is not the only conflict in the novel. The composition of the novel is mirror-like: Bazarov travels around the same places twice. This makes it possible for Turgenev to show the second conflict in the novel. This conflict is connected with the main character, his state of mind. Bazarov's love story - the most important topic novel. In the first part of the work, we also encounter several love stories, but they can be considered the backstories of the characters in relation to their further destinies. Even from a position love conflict between Pavel Petrovich and Bazarov there is much more in common than it seems at first glance. Love completely changes everyone's life. Because of his love for Princess R. Pavel Petrovich abandons his former life and career. Love for Anna Sergeevna Odintsova is higher and stronger than all theories - Bazarov begins to understand the failure of his ideals.

The first half of the work, for the most part, makes you think about the foundations of pre-reform Russia, about the expediency of certain political views principles and outlook on life. The second half of the work raises various moral and philosophical questions more and makes you think about the real values ​​of life. No wonder the plot of the work was conceived just like that. From the work we learn that the most bright characters Those who put their principles above everything in the world did not have a happy fate: Bazarov dies, Pavel Petrovich moves to Dresden, where he continues to adhere to his former views, living alone. In turn, Arkady and Katya, Nikolai Petrovich and Fenechka live happily, protecting each other with all their might, living as a big and happy family. Life goes on, goes on as usual. Not without reason, at the end of the novel, only two happy family, and Bazarov, who is fighting for a different future, and Pavel Petrovich, an "archaic phenomenon", disappear. Family, friendship, love are values ​​that remain in life forever. This is something eternal, timeless, and such striking phenomena as Pavel Petrovich or Bazarov are an era that ends sooner or later, which exists only for a certain period of time.

Thus, in the novel "Fathers and Sons" I.S. Turgenev raises many issues relevant to society. It is noteworthy that the work does not lose its relevance at the present time, and is also unlikely to lose it in the future, since the problems raised by the author are eternal, cross-cutting in Russian literature. The reader cannot, after reading, not think about the true life values about the role of the family in the life of every person. After reading the novel "Fathers and Sons" you think about the importance of friendly relations between parents and children, such relations as were between Arkady and Nikolai Petrovich. You can’t live guided only by reason, a competent balance between mind and soul is what Bazarov lacked. It is worth noting that the novel by I.S. Turgenev "Fathers and Sons" is a work that is memorable for its depth, a work that raises many questions, the answers to which the reader will have to look for inside himself, unconsciously comparing himself with the main characters of the work.