The image of a Russian estate. The history of the Russian estate and the way of life of its inhabitants. Rosfoto State Museum and Exhibition Center


The image of a noble estate

and the fate of the hero in the novel by I.A. Goncharova "Oblomov"

Technologies: problem-based learning, ICT technology, integrated learning technology

Form of conduct: lesson-dialogue

Teacher's word

Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov came from a wealthy merchant family: his father was engaged in the grain trade, his ancestors in several generations were merchants. The writer had neither hereditary nor acquired estate. He spent his childhood in Simbirsk, and most of his life is connected with Petersburg, where he served. However, despite the lack of personal experience of the "estate" childhood, Goncharov in the novel "Oblomov" creates a surprisingly believable, colorful and tangible image of a noble estate. His "Flemish" was manifested in the image of Oblomov's estate in all its strength.

The main action of the novel "Oblomov" takes place in St. Petersburg and its environs, but the image of Oblomovka, which repeatedly appears on the pages of the work, is one of the central ones. On the one hand, Oblomovka is the childhood of the protagonist, that is, what, according to Goncharov, determines the character and, possibly, the fate of a person. On the other hand, this is the ideal of Ilya Ilyich, a kind of utopia.

We get to know the estate at the beginning of the novel, through a letter from the headman, who is clearly deceiving his owner. Note that the nobles quite often found themselves cut off from their possessions and entrusted the farm to the headman or manager. You can recall what we wrote about in the introductory article to the heading: sometimes only childhood and old age were associated with the nobleman's native estate. The years of adolescence and adolescence fell on study, and maturity - on the service. At this time, they rarely came to the family nest. It also happened, as N. A. Nekrasov describes in The Forgotten Village:

Finally one day in the middle of the road
The cogwheels seemed like a train:
A tall oak coffin stands on the sidewalk,
And there is a master in the coffin; and behind the coffin - a new one.
The old one was buried, the new one wiped away the tears,
He got into his carriage and left for St. Petersburg.

A nobleman could not live on his estate for various reasons. The main ones are two: the public service and love for urban (secular, cultural) life. However, none of these reasons exist for Oblomov. In the first part, we see the hero's attitude to life in the capital, and it is obvious that he does not like it, it seems to be full of meaningless fuss. He defines each of his guests with a summarizing word - "unfortunate." At the same time, Oblomov is not bound by the service. In addition, it is obvious that the farm requires his intervention.

- Why, then, Oblomov does not go to the village. What's stopping him?

It is also important here how the hero sees any journey (even moving to another apartment in the city), and the fact that he first needs to draw up a plan (he tells Stolz about this). We get acquainted with this plan in the eighth chapter of the first part.

Let's reread the passage. We will answer problematic questions:

- What does the plan consist of?

- What is the main part of it?

- Why does the "fundamental article" of the Oblomov estate management run through the mind only in passing?

- What in this regard causes a clear smile of Goncharov and ours, the reader's?

- How useful and fruitful are Oblomov's projects?

- What other character of Russian literature does Oblomov remind here?

- The features of what literary trend can be seen in the description of a summer evening at the estate?

- What is the beauty and what is the disadvantage of such an ideal?

CONCLUSIONS (generalization of students' judgments)

Oblomov's plans show his Manilov dreaminess, inability and unwillingness to delve into the management of the economy, an idealized, some kind of sentimental-bucolic idea of ​​local life. His estate, with the steam rising from the fields and the peasants returning from the fields, seems to be opera-decorative. Life on the estate is in no way connected with the thought of work, but is thought of as a state of pleasant idleness (even the mongrel is depicted as "idle").

Let's turn now to Oblomov's sleep (part 1, chapter 9) and take a mental walk along that real Oblomovka that our hero knew (after all, this is, in fact, not a dream, but a story about his childhood).

- What is Oblomovka in this dream?

- What characteristic features, details do you remember?

- What is the intonation of the story?

- What unites all the inhabitants of Oblomovka - both nobles and peasants?

- With what intonation does Goncharov draw Oblomovka and its inhabitants?

Let's consider at least a small piece of text in more detail from the point of view of style. Questions (can be in groups):

-How does the style of this text differ from the narrative manner of the writer throughout the novel as a whole?

- What is the purpose of using such expressions as "roaring lions", "Egyptian plagues", what do they tune the reader to?

- How is the expectation destroyed by the appearance of the expressions "cackling chickens", "chewing cows", etc.?

- Why is the entire fragment based on negation?

- What is the style of this landscape?

- What unites him with Oblomov's dreams from the eighth chapter?

You can show students one or two pictures of a sentimental plan that are idyllic (slides 1-2). Let's pay attention to how people and nature are connected in the paintings, how the nobles and peasants are depicted.

So, the description of Oblomovka is again an idyllic picture, reminiscent of a sentimental pastoral, but presented by the author in an ironic manner. As a hero, she is perceived without any irony, therefore sentimental and ironic fragments are constantly mixed.

In the center of the dream is the image of little Ilyusha Oblomov. In fact, we have before us yet another estate "childhood" in Russian literature. The familiar moment of the child's awakening is striking: “Ilya Ilyich woke up in the morning in his little bed. He is only seven years old. It is easy for him, fun. "

Discussion of questions ahead of the assignment

- What are the similarities between the childhoods of Nikita, Nikolenka Irtenev and Ilyusha Oblomov? How do they differ?

Illustrative material will help us here. Let us compare illustrations by different authors: E. Boehm, Y. Gershkovich, I. Konovalov, V. Taburin, T. Shishmareva, N. Shcheglova, P. Estoppe.

Questions for the slides:

Slide number 3. What mood does the illustration evoke? Imagine that you are entering Oblomovka. What emotions do you have?

Slide number 4. Why is the house by the ravine "honored" with a separate illustration? What additional meaning does the illustration gain from the child's figurine?

Slide number 5... Compare the illustrations by T. Shishmareva and V. Taburin. What do they have in common? (Note the composition). What does Ilya's pose express in both paintings? By what means does each of the authors convey the atmosphere of Oblomovka and the state of Ilya? Are these illustrations similar or different in concept?

GENERALIZATION OF ANSWERS

At first glance, the illustrations are remarkably similar. The pose of the hero, the location of his figure, the tree and the lopsided structures on the right side of the picture, the ascending diagonal clearly visible in the composition, the contrast between the general numbness of the world and the living figure of a child, which is also located diagonally, but oppositely directed, almost coincide. However, upon careful reading of the paintings, we will notice that in Shishmareva's illustration we have a curious child who is trying to lean out the gates of the sleeping kingdom while his guards are sleeping, but he seems to have stuck his feet to the border that he cannot cross; he himself remains there in the yard, only his head crosses the goal line. Taburin's boy is more free, his figure is more dynamic. He reaches for flowering herbs, wanting to discern and comprehend the secrets of the world that surrounds him.

Slide number 6... Compare the illustrations by Y. Gershkovich and I. Konovalov. What moment of the text does each picture illustrate? How are these illustrations similar and how are they different (pay attention to the composition, the poses of the characters, the setting, the details)? How do the authors show the presence or absence of Ilyusha's contact with the nanny at this moment? What does each of the illustrations tell about? What thought does the proximity of these two illustrations lead us to?

The first illustration depicts the moment when Ilyusha looks on a summer morning at a passing cart and the shadow it casts and is surprised at the world, thinking about everything he sees. In this episode, Ilyusha is tormented by the desire to run out of the yard, to run up the mountain. Mentally, he left the Oblomov circle. The artist managed to convey this in the very pose of the boy, in his focus on long-term perspective.

On the second - one of the winter evenings, when the nanny tells Ilya stories and fairy tales. Here, on the contrary, the interconnection between the child and the nanny is emphasized: the characters are in a tightly confined space, Ilyusha greedily absorbs stories, after which "he always has the disposition to lie on the stove, walk around in a ready-made, unearned dress and eat at the expense of a good sorceress."

These illustrations clarify the peculiar duality of Oblomov's childhood and the hero's soul.

Slide number 7... Compare the illustrations by E. Boehm and N. Shcheglov. What do these images have in common? What is the principle behind their construction?

The illustrations show the same moment: when the nanny falls asleep and Ilya, seizing the moment, sets off to explore the world around him on his own. Both images, differing in technique and style, are based on the contrast between the static figure of the nanny and the dynamic figure of the child. But if in Boehm everything turns out to be, like a frame, closed by the boundaries of the dovecote, then in Shcheglov a spacious world with the height of the skies and running clouds opens up to the child, towards which he joyfully stretches out his hands. The contrast between Oblomovka and the big world is emphasized in this illustration by light and shadow: the nanny is sitting in the shadow of the house, while Ilyusha ran out into the sun-drenched space.

Slide number 8. What is so unusual about the illustration of a French artist? What impression does she make on you? What is the thought expressed by the composition of the drawing? What mood do the figures of people create?

In this picture, all the heroes froze in a kind of sleepy static. The figures of adults tightly surround the child. At the same time, the impression is born not so much of love and care as of constraint and even threat.

Summing up the conversation about illustrations, let's say that there is a lot of love in the life of little Ilyusha: everyone adores and pampers him. But this atmosphere of love, which we emphasized as something purely positive when talking about the childhood of Nikolenka or Nikita, here becomes cloying and somehow distorted: “All this state and the entourage of the Oblomovs' house picked up Ilya Ilyich and began to shower him with caresses and praises; he barely had time to wipe away the traces of uninvited kisses.After that, feeding him with buns, crackers, cream began.Then his mother, having fondled him, let him go for a walk in the garden, in the yard, in the meadow, with strict confirmation to the nanny not to leave the child alone, not to allow him to visit the horses, to dogs, to the goat, do not go far from home, and most importantly, do not let him into the ravine, as the most terrible place in the neighborhood, which enjoyed a bad reputation. "

So, we see that in childhood Ilya Ilyich was a lively and receptive child, but unlike Nikolenka or Nikita, he grows up under constant care, he is actually not allowed to do anything himself. In addition, his life lacks the cultural atmosphere that we saw in the Tolstoys (music, reading). From this point of view, it is interesting to compare the description of a winter evening in Nikita's Childhood and in Oblomov's Dream.

Goncharov believed that the impressions of the earliest childhood are decisive in a person's life.: “Not a single trifle, not a single feature escapes the inquisitive attention of the child; the picture of home life is indelibly engraved in the soul; the soft mind is saturated with living examples and unconsciously draws the program of his life according to the life that surrounds him. "

What are adults doing, what does little Ilyusha absorb?

“Oblomov himself is an old man, too, not without work. He sits at the window all morning and strictly observes everything that happens in the yard, "Goncharov writes about Ilya Ilyich's father.

- What are these activities, how does the author talk about them, how does he relate to them?

- What is the activity of Oblomov's mother?

- What does the life of all the inhabitants of the estate revolve around?

The activities of Ilya Ivanovich are absolutely meaningless: he looks out the window all day and distracts everyone working with unnecessary questions. His wife is focused on what is the main thing for the Oblomovites, around which their world revolves - on food.

“Perhaps Ilyusha has already noticed and understands for a long time what they say and do in his presence: like his father, in velvet pantaloons, in a brown woolen wadded jacket, day-to-day, he only knows that he walks from corner to corner with his hands clasped back, sniffs tobacco and blows her nose, while mother goes from coffee to tea, from tea to dinner; that a parent would never even think of believing how many heaps were mowed or compressed, and exacting for an omission, but give him a handkerchief not soon, he will shout about the riots and put the whole house upside down, ”concludes Goncharov.

This is the world of the estate in the childhood memories of Ilya Ilyich - the image of his "golden age", the ideal (idealized) past.

OBlom's utopia placed by the author in the second part of the novel, in the episode of the dispute with Stolz (Chapter 4). Oblomov draws to a friend imaginary pictures of his future life.

Let's reread this text carefully with a parallel drawing up a table.

Dream / Childhood Fragment

(idealized past)

Dream Break (Perfect Future)

Characteristic features and details of everyday life

The main activities of the heroes, turning points in the course of life

Atmosphere, mood

Then we ask you to mark the points in the table coincidences and differences.

- Is Oblomov's ideal similar to what surrounded him in childhood? How?

- What is the difference that Oblomov so ardently defends?

- Why is the offer wonderful?“The lights are on in the house; five knives are knocking in the kitchen; a pan of mushrooms, cutlets, berries ... there's music ... Casta diva ... Casta diva! " - how does it characterize the Oblomov idyll?

One of the reasons that keeps Oblomov from going to the village, according to his own words, is that he wants to come there not alone, but with his wife. Note that Oblomovka is the edge family idylls... However, having become Olga's fiancé and realizing that he has nowhere to take his young wife, Oblomov will never arrange business on the estate.

- What is stopping him?

- Why can't Oblomov complete this path from his current state to the realization of his dreams - the path that he always mentally "jumps over" ("Well, I would come to a new, peacefully arranged house ...", - he begins to expound his dreams to Stolz , not dwelling in any way on the thought of how the house will become "peacefully arranged")?

- Why, instead of a family estate, at the end of the novel we see Oblomov on the Vyborg side, in a kind of “surrogate” Oblomovka?

D / Z The tenth graders will have to answer these questions during the subsequent study of the novel.

APPLICATION

“Ilya Ilyich began to develop a plan for the estate. He quickly ran in his mind several serious, fundamental articles about rent, about plowing, came up with a new measure, stricter, against the laziness and vagrancy of the peasants and went on to arrange his own life in the countryside.

He was occupied with the construction of a country house; he gladly stopped for a few minutes on the arrangement of the rooms, determined the length and width of the dining room, the billiard room, and thought about where his study would be turned by the windows; I even remembered furniture and carpets.

After that, he located the outbuilding of the house, realizing the number of guests that he intended to receive, set aside a place for stables, sheds, human and various other services.

Finally he turned to the garden: he decided to leave all the old linden and oak trees as they are, and to destroy the apple and pear trees and plant acacias in their place; I thought about the park, but, having made a rough estimate of the costs in my mind, I found that it was expensive, and, postponing it until another time, moved on to flower gardens and greenhouses.

Then a seductive thought about future fruit flashed through him so vividly that he suddenly moved several years ahead to the village, when the estate was already arranged according to his plan and when he lived there without a break.

He imagined himself sitting on a summer evening on the terrace, at a tea table, under a canopy of trees impenetrable to the sun, with a long pipe, and lazily sucking in the smoke, pensively enjoying the view opening from behind the trees, the coolness, the silence; and in the distance fields turn yellow, the sun sinks behind the familiar birch forest and blushes a pond as smooth as a mirror; steam rises from the fields; it gets cool, dusk comes; the peasants are walking home in droves.

An idle mongrel sits at the gate; there you can hear cheerful voices, laughter, balalaika, girls play with burners; his little ones frolic around him, climb on his knees, hang on his neck; at the samovar sits ... the queen of everything around her, his deity ... a woman! wife! Meanwhile, in the dining room, decorated with graceful simplicity, welcoming lights shone brightly, a large round table was being laid; Zakhar, promoted to majordomo, with completely gray sideburns, lays the table, arranges the crystal with a pleasant ringing and lays out the silver, continually dropping a glass or a fork on the floor; sit down to a hearty supper; here is also a friend of his childhood, his constant friend, Stolz, and other, all familiar faces; then go to sleep ...

Oblomov's face was suddenly covered with a blush of happiness ... "

“The Lord did not punish the other side with either Egyptian or simple ulcers. None of the inhabitants saw or remembers any terrible heavenly signs, no balls of fire, no sudden darkness; no poisonous reptiles are found there; locusts do not fly there; there are no roaring lions, no roaring tigers, not even bears and wolves, because there are no forests. Only in abundance are chewing cows, bleating sheep and cackling chickens wandering through the fields and around the village.

God knows whether a poet or a dreamer would be content with the nature of a peaceful corner. As you know, these gentlemen love to gaze at the moon and listen to the clicking of nightingales. They love the coquette moon, which would dress up in fawn clouds and mysteriously shine through the branches of trees or pour sheaves of silver rays into the eyes of their fans.

And in this land, no one knew what kind of moon it was - everyone called it a month.

She somehow kindly, with all her eyes looked at the villages and the field and looked very much like a cleaned copper basin. "

“The whole corner of fifteen or twenty versts around was a series of picturesque sketches, cheerful, smiling landscapes. The sandy and sloping banks of the bright river, small shrubbery creeping up from the hill to the water, a curved ravine with a stream at the bottom and a birch grove - everything seemed to have been deliberately tidied up one to one and skillfully drawn.

A heart worn out by worries or completely unfamiliar with them asks to hide in this forgotten corner and live with unknown happiness. "

Publications of the section Literature

Manors and summer cottages in the works of Russian classics

A country house or a manor house located not far from the city is a real Russian phenomenon. We often find descriptions of such estates in Russian classical literature: many important events take place precisely in country decorations, in shady alleys and gardens.

Lev Tolstoy

One of the famous summer residents was Leo Tolstoy. His life revolved around the Yasnaya Polyana family estate, where he raised his children, taught peasant children and worked on manuscripts. The Russian estate became for Tolstoy not just a home where happy childhood years pass, but also a place where character is tempered. His views on the structure of the manor house and the way of life in general formed the basis of the worldview of the young landowner Konstantin Lyovin, one of the heroes of the novel "Anna Karenina".

“The house was large, old, and although Levin lived alone, he heated and occupied the whole house. He knew that it was stupid, he knew that it was not even good and contrary to his current new plans, but this house was the whole world for Levin. This was the world in which his father and mother lived and died. They lived that life, which for Levin seemed the ideal of all perfection and which he dreamed of renewing with his wife, with his family. "

Leo Tolstoy, "Anna Karenina"

For Lyovin, the estate is not only fertile ground for nostalgia, but also a means of earning money, an opportunity to provide himself and his family with a decent existence. Only a well-groomed and strong economy could survive in the new Russia. There was no room in the Tolstoy estate for the pampered Onegins - they fled to the cities. A real owner remained in the village, who is alien to laziness: "Levin also ate oysters, although white bread with cheese was more pleasant to him.".

Ivan Turgenev

The inhabitants of the provincial noble nests near Ivan Turgenev are enlightened and educated people who are aware of cultural and social events. The widowed landowner Nikolai Kirsanov, although he lived without a break in the estate, adhered to advanced ideas: he subscribed to magazines and books, was fond of poetry and music. And he gave his son an excellent education. The Kirsanov brothers made a fashionable mansion out of the old parental home: they brought furniture and sculptures there, laid out gardens and parks around, dug ponds and canals, erected garden pavilions and gazebos.

“And Pavel Petrovich returned to his elegant office, papered on the walls with beautiful wild-colored wallpaper, with weapons hung on a motley Persian carpet, with walnut furniture upholstered in a dark green tripod, with a renaissance library (from French“ in the style of the Renaissance ”. [I] - Ed. Note [I]) from old black oak, with bronze figurines on a magnificent writing table, with a fireplace ... "

Ivan Turgenev, "Fathers and Sons"

In the days of Turgenev's youth, the estate was considered a place where a nobleman could hide from high society, rest in body and soul. However, the writer felt anxiety - as if soon the estate, as a stronghold of reliability and peace, would disappear. Even then, descriptions of decaying estates appeared in his works - this is how he imagined the future of the landlord culture of Russia.

“Lavretsky went out into the garden, and the first thing that caught his eye was the very bench on which he had once spent several happy, unrepeated moments with Liza; she turned black, twisted; but he recognized her, and his soul was seized by that feeling that has no equal in sweetness and sorrow - a feeling of living sadness about the vanished youth, about the happiness that he once possessed.

Ivan Turgenev, "The Noble Nest"

Anton Chekhov

Dilapidated summer cottages from the works of Turgenev, overgrown with weeds, burdocks, gooseberries and raspberries, in which the traces of human presence will finally die out very soon, are reflected in the work of Anton Chekhov. The deserted or ruined estate figures as a place of events in almost every story.

Chekhov himself was not a "chick of a noble nest"; in 1892 he and his family moved to a neglected and uncomfortable estate in Melikhovo. For example, in the story "House with a Mezzanine" only a house with a mezzanine and dark park alleys remained of the former landowner's wealth, but the life of the owners is being adjusted to the new era: one of the daughters left their parents forever, and the second now "lives on his own money" very proud.

“He said little about the Volchaninovs. Lida, according to him, still lived in Shelkovka and taught children at school; little by little she managed to gather around her a circle of people she liked, who made up a strong party and in the last zemstvo elections "gave a ride" to Balagin, who until that time had held the entire district in his hands. As for Zhenya, Belokurov only said that she did not live at home and was not known where. "

Anton Chekhov, "House with a Mezzanine"

In the play "The Cherry Orchard" Anton Chekhov portrayed the Russian aristocracy as doomed and degenerate. In place of the nobles, stuck in debt, unable to think pragmatically, a new man comes - a merchant, enterprising and modern. In the play, it was Yermolai Lopakhin, who suggested to the owner of the estate, Lyubov Ranevskaya, "to break the cherry orchard and land along the river into summer cottages and then lease them out for summer cottages." Ranevskaya resolutely rejected Lopakhin's proposal, although it would bring huge profits and help pay off debts. Chekhov shows his readers: a new time has come, in which the economy and pure calculation reign. And aristocrats with a fine mental organization are living out their days and will soon disappear.

“Set for the first act. There are no curtains on the windows, no pictures, there is a little furniture that is folded into one corner, as if for sale. Feels emptiness. Suitcases, road junctions, etc. are stacked near the exit door and in the back of the stage. "

Anton Chekhov, "The Cherry Orchard"

Ivan Bunin

Ivan Bunin, a representative of an impoverished noble family, the “last classic” of Russian literature, has repeatedly addressed the theme of a noble estate in his work. At the dacha, events unfolded in the novel "The Life of Arsenyev", and in the collection of stories "Dark Alleys", and in the story "Mitya's Love", and, of course, in the story "At the Dacha".

Bunin's estate is not just a place of action, but a full-fledged hero of a work with his own character and constantly changing mood. In the first works of Bunin, country houses are inextricably linked with the cultural traditions of the nobility, the established way of life and their own customs. The dachas are always quiet, green, well-fed and crowded. Such is the estate in the stories "Tanka", "On a Farm", "Antonovskie Apples", "Village", "Sukhodol".

“The cackling of chickens was loudly and merrily heard from the yard. The silence of a bright summer morning was still in the house. The living room was connected to the dining room by an arch, and a small room adjoined the dining room, all filled with palms and oleanders in tubs and brightly illuminated by amber sunlight. The canary was fiddling there in a swaying cage, and one could hear how sometimes seeds of seed were pouring, clearly falling on the floor. "

Ivan Bunin, "At the Dacha"

In 1917, the writer witnessed the mass destruction of the world of noble nests dear and close to him. In 1920, Ivan Bunin left Russia forever - he emigrated to France. In Paris, Bunin wrote a cycle of stories "Dark Alleys", the story "Mitya's Love" and the novel "The Life of Arseniev".

"The estate was small, the house was old and unpretentious, the household was simple, not requiring a large courtyard - life began quiet for Mitya."

Ivan Bunin, "Mitya's Love"

In all the works one can feel the bitterness of loss - of the home, homeland and harmony of life. Although his emigre noble nests are doomed to perish, they keep memories of the world of childhood and youth, the world of the old noble life.

II. Chapter 1. The idealizing concept of a noble estate

1.1. Childhood as a time of paradise

1.2. Love in the works of the idealizing concept of a noble estate

1.3. Trinity Day as one of the components of the manor myth

1.4. "The Sacrament of the Family"

Chapter 2. Critical concept of a noble estate

2.1. Childhood as a reflection of the distorted foundations of the life of a noble estate

2.2. Love in the works of the critical concept of a noble estate

2.3. Ancestral memory and fatal predestination

IV. Chapter 3. The dialectical concept of a noble estate

3.1. Childhood as a reflection of the fullness and inconsistency of being

3.2. Love in the works of the dialectical concept of a noble estate

3.3. Literary centricity as one of the main features of the image of a noble estate

3.4. Noble estate and St. Petersburg

3.5. Generic memory and personality activity

Dissertation introduction (part of the abstract) on the theme "The image of a noble estate in Russian prose of the late XIX - early XX centuries"

The appearance in fiction of the image of a noble estate was a consequence of the decree of Catherine II ("Charter to the nobility", 1785) on the release of the nobility from military service, after which the role and significance of the nobility's local life in Russian culture began to strengthen. At the end of the 18th - beginning of the 19th centuries, the noble estate experienced its heyday, after which its gradual, until 1917, began to fade away.

During the first half of the 19th century, the noble estate was included in works of art, mainly as a person's habitat, a certain way of life that characterizes the owner of the estate (nobleman), his moral and spiritual foundations, way of life and culture, although already during this period the process begins symbolizing the image of a noble estate, which, in particular, finds expression in the work of A.S. Pushkin. In the second half of the 19th century, when the crisis of this way of life becomes most noticeable, the noble estate declares itself as a special cultural phenomenon, which they begin to actively study, describe, and strive to preserve. In the 80-90s of the XIX century, they began to speak of estates as cultural monuments, from 1909 to 1915 in St. Petersburg there was a Society for the Protection and Preservation of Art and Antiquity Monuments in Russia.

In the fiction of the second half of the 19th century, manor masterpieces by S.T.Aksakov, I.S. Turgenev, I.A.Goncharov, and L.N. Tolstoy were created. The concept of a generic noble nest, introduced into culture by the Slavophiles (Shchukin, 1994: 41), is gaining more and more power and significance and by the end of the 19th century is perceived as one of the central symbols of Russian culture.

At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, writers of a wide variety of views, belonging to different literary trends and associations, paid increased attention to the image of a noble estate. Among them are the names of such artists of the word as A.P. Chekhov, I.A. Bunin, B.K. Zaitsev, A.N. Tolstoy, M.A. Kuzmin, N.G. Garin-Mikhailovsky, A. Bely, F. K. Sologub, G. I. Chulkov, S. N. Sergeev-Tsenskiy, B. A. Sadovskoy, S. A. Auslender, P.S. Romanov,

S.M. Gorodetsky and many others. As a result, a huge layer of fiction was created, where the image of a noble estate received detailed elaboration and multifaceted lighting.

The relevance of the study is due to the active growth of interest in the lost values ​​of the national culture and attempts to revive them. An appeal to the image of a noble estate is necessary, in our opinion, to solve the problem of self-identification of Russian culture. Comprehending the image of a noble estate as one of the fundamental symbols of Russia is a way of national self-knowledge and self-preservation and provides an opportunity to restore a vast complex of moral and aesthetic norms, largely lost in the vicissitudes of recent centuries.

The object of research in the dissertation is images of a noble estate in Russian prose of the late 19th - early 20th centuries. The subject of the dissertation is a noble estate as a phenomenon of the Russian literary process at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. The research material consists of works of art by such writers as A.P. Chekhov, I.A. Bunin, B.K. Zaitsev, A.N. Tolstoy, M.A. Kuzmin, N.G. Garin-Mikhailovsky, D.V. Grigorovich, A. Bely, F. K. Sologub, G. I. Chulkov, I. A. Novikov, S. N. Sergeev-Tsenskiy, B. A. Sadovskoy, S. A. Auslender, P.S. Romanov , I.I.Yasinsky, S.M. Gorodetsky, A.V. Amfitheatrov, M.P.Artsybashev, A.N.Budishchev, V.V. Muizhel. Prose and poetic works of other writers and poets of the 19th - first third of the 20th centuries are also used as material for a comparative analysis.

The degree of study of the issue. The noble estate in pre-revolutionary and modern science has been studied and is being studied to a greater extent from the standpoint of historical and cultural studies. Since the 70s of the XIX century, as G. Zlochevsky notes, guidebooks around Moscow have appeared, which necessarily include a section on estates (for example, N.K. Outskirts of Moscow. "(" 2nd ed., 1880)). From 1913 to 1917, the journal Stolitsa i Usadba (Stolitsa i Usadba) was published (the title of this journal reflected the opposition in Russian culture between the manor and the capital worlds); publications about estates are also published in a number of other journals. Before the revolution, monographs also appeared on the history and architecture of individual estates. In particular, in 1912, the book was published. MM Golitsyn about the estate Petrovskoe of the Zvenigorod district of the Moscow province ("Russian estates. Issue 2. Petrovskoe"), in 1916 - the work of P.S. Sheremetev "Vyazema". There are published memoirs of both individual representatives of the nobility, and collections, including the memoirs of a number of authors. So in 1911, under the editorship of NN Rusov, the book "Landowners' Russia according to the notes of contemporaries" was published, which contains memoirs of representatives of the nobility of the late 18th - early 19th centuries. But in pre-revolutionary science, according to G. Zlochevsky, there was no comprehensive study of manor culture; publications about estates were mostly descriptive; the authors of articles and monographs acted more as historians and chroniclers (Zlochevsky, 1993, p. 85).

During the Soviet period, the study of the noble estate practically ceased, or was carried out from an ideological standpoint. In 1926, for example, E.S. Kots's book "Serf Intelligentsia" was published, in which local life is presented from a negative side (in particular, the author examines in detail the issue of serf harems). Memoirs written during the Soviet era become available to readers, as a rule, only after many years. For example, in 2000, the memoirs of LD Dukhovskaya (nee Voyekova) were published, the author of which is trying to rehabilitate the manor culture in the eyes of his contemporaries: them and self-justification. " (Dukhovskaya, 2000, p. 345).

An active revival of interest in the noble estate begins in the last decade of the 20th century. There are many historical and cultural works devoted to the study of everyday life, culture, architecture, and the history of noble estates. Among them is the work of YM Lotman “Conversations about Russian culture. Life and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII - early XIX centuries) "(St. Petersburg, 1997), as well as collections of the Society for the Study of the Russian Estate, which include the works of many researchers (G.Yu. Sternin, O.S. Evangulova, T. P. Kazhdan, M. V. Nashchokina, L. P. Sokolova, L. V. Rasskazova, E. N. Savinova,

V.I. Novikova, A.A. Shmeleva, A.V. Razina, E.G. Safonova, M.Yu. Korobka, T.N. Golovina and others). It is also necessary to note the fundamental collective work "Noble and merchant rural estate in Russia in the 16th - 20th centuries." (M., 2001); collections "The World of the Russian Estate" (Moscow, 1995) and "Noble Nests of Russia. History, culture, architecture "(M., 2000); works by L.V. Ershova (Ershov, 1998), V. Kuchenkova (Kuchenkova, 2001), E.M. Lazareva (Lazareva, 1999),

S. D. Okhlyabinina (Okhlyabinin, 2006), E. V. Lavrentyeva (Lavrent'eva, 2006).

In recent years, in addition, several dissertations have been defended, considering the estate as a phenomenon of Russian culture, economics, politics (Popova M.S. Russian noble estate in the context of the mentality of Russian culture (M., 2004); Kuznetsova Yu.M. Russian noble The estate: Economic, political and socio-cultural aspects (Samara, 2005); Ponomareva MV Noble estate in the cultural and artistic life of Russia (Moscow, 2005)).

The authors of these works seek to substantiate the importance of the noble estate for the history of Russia, to show the organic connection of the noble estate with Russian culture, to prove that the estate was not something alien in relation to the latter, but was its integral part. In the noted historical and cultural works, the Russian noble estate is considered as a special microcosm, the whole Universe (O.S.Evangulova, T.P.Kazhdan, M.V. Nashchokina), which is a universal symbol of Russian life (G.Yu. Sternin) , the quintessence of the Russian state (M.V. Nashchokina, Kuznetsova Yu.M.), the center for the formation, development and preservation of the dominant features of Russian culture, an indicator of the state of Russian culture (Popova M.S.). Scientists especially emphasize the value of the personal, individual beginning in a noble estate (each estate, "both literally and figuratively, is" handwork "" (Kuznetsova, 2005, p. 146); "self-portrait of the owner" (Evangulova, 1996, p.49); even “parts of the garden [.] became, as it were, parts [.] of the inner world” of the owners (Nashchokina, 2001, p. 12)), as well as the metaphorical correlation in Russian culture of the estate with the image of the Garden of Eden.

However, as we have already noted, the subject of research of these works is the noble estate as a phenomenon of Russian history, economy, and culture. The appeal of scientists to Russian literature in these cases is limited to the task of a simple illustration of certain features of its history, economic and everyday life.

A broader and multidimensional illumination of the image of a noble estate in Russian literature of the 18th - 20th centuries is given in the book by E.E.Dmitrieva, O.N. Kuptsova "The Life of the Manor Myth: Lost and Found Paradise" (Moscow, 2003). The authors refer to a huge number of literary sources, including little or absolutely unknown. However, this work is more art history than literary criticism. Works of art are often used as illustrative material for cultural aspects, showing how a real estate influenced Russian literature, or, conversely, how literature formed "the estate's life, and the real estate space, and the very way of living in the estate" (Dmitrieva, Kuptsova, 2003, p. 5).

Until now, a comprehensive literary study of the image of a noble estate in the prose of the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries has not been created as a phenomenon of the Russian literary process.

The image of a noble estate has been studied most fully in Russian literature of the second half of the 19th century, in the works of S.T. Aksakov, I.S. Turgenev, I.A. Goncharov, L.N. Tolstoy (see, for example, the works of V.M. Markovich "IS Turgenev and the Russian realistic novel of the XIX century" (L., 1982), VG Shchukin "The myth of the noble nest. Geocultural research on Russian classical literature" (Krakow, 1997); VB Legonkova " The image of a noble estate in the works of S. T. Aksakov, I. S. Turgenev and L. Tolstoy "(Magnitogorsk, 1991); G. N. Popova" The world of the Russian province in the novels of I. A. Goncharov "(Yelets, 2002 )).

In Russian prose of the late 19th - early 20th centuries, the image of a noble estate is considered based on the works of a limited circle of authors. Thus, critics of the beginning of the 20th century focused on depicting local life in the works of I.A. Bunin and A.N. Tolstoy, as well as A.V. Amfiteatrov and S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky. However, in the critical works of the early 20th century, there is no consideration of the image of a noble estate as a phenomenon of Russian culture in the literature of a certain period as a whole. Such critics as K. Chukovsky (Chukovsky, 1914, p. 73-88), V. Lvov-Rogachevsky (Lvov-Rogachevsky, 1911, p. 240-265), G. Chulkov (Chulkov, 1998, p. 392- 395), N. Korobka (Korobka, 1912, p. 1263-1268), E. Koltonovskaya (Koltonovskaya, 1916, p. 70-84), V. Cheshikhin-Vetrinsky (Cheshikhin-Vetrinsky, 1915, p. 70-84 ), E. Lundberg (Lundberg, 1914, p. 51), A. Gvozdev (Gvozdev, 1915, p. 241-242), characterizing the image of local life in the works of the above-named writers, limit themselves to one or two phrases, only mention the conversion authors to the depiction of local life. So, for example, G. Chulkov, analyzing the story of IA Bunin "New Year", speaks of the miraculous power of the estate, awakening the feeling of love in the heroes (Chulkov, 1998: 394). V. Cheshikhin-Vetrinsky, considering such works of A.N. Tolstoy as "The Lame Master" and "Gullies", emphasize the "warm, sincere attitude of the author" to the provincial noble life and "people of this life" (Cheshikhin-Vetrinsky, 1915, p. 438). E. Koltonovskaya writes about the attempt of the writer in the cycle "Trans-Volga" by means of the image of the local nobility "to look into the elemental depths of the Russian man, his nature, his soul" (Koltonovskaya, 1916, p. 72).

Being noticed in the works of I.A. Bunin, A.N. Tolstoy, A.V. Amfiteatrov and S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky, but not having received sufficient development here, the image of a noble estate in the works of other writers of the late XIX we are considering - at the beginning of the 20th century, it turned out to be completely unexplored by the critics of the "Silver Age".

In modern literary science, the image of a noble estate in the work of many authors at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries still remains unexplored. Such scientists as N.V. Barkovskaya (Barkovskaya, 1996), L.A. Kolobaeva (Kolobaeva, 1990), Yu.V. Maltsev (Maltsev, 1994), M.V. Mikhailova (Mikhailova, 2004), O. V. Slivitskaya (Slivitskaya, 2004), R.S. Spivak (Spivak, 1997), refer to the image of a noble estate in the works of I. A. Bunin, A. Bely, F. K. Sologub, I. A. Novikov. But in the works of these scientists, the image of a noble estate is not an object of special, detailed analysis.

The subject of a separate study is the image of a noble estate in the works of N.S. Avilova (Avilova, 2001), U.K. Abisheva (Abisheva, 2002). G.A. Golotina (Golotina, 1985), L.V. Ershova (Ershova, 1998, 1999, 2002), N.V. Zaitseva (Zaitseva, 1999), L.P. Solomakhina (Solomakhina, 2000), dedicated to the works of I.A. Bunin and A.N. Tolstoy.

Literary science reveals the reasons for the destruction and decline of the noble estate in the work of I.A. Bunin, notes the dialectic nature of the Bunin concept of the estate, as well as the idealization of estate life in the writer's emigre work.

L. V. Ershova in the article "Images-symbols of the estate world in the prose of I. A. Bunin" speaks of the writer's ambivalent attitude to the world of the noble estate and divides the symbols in the works of I. A. Bunin into two rows: negative, "reflecting desolation and the death of the former "gold mine" of the Russian province ", and positive," associated with deep and sincere nostalgia, with memory, which tends to idealize the past, uplift and romanticize it "(Ershova, 2002, p. 105). In the emigre period, from the point of view of the researcher, opposed to each other positive and negative series of images-symbols come to dialectical unity - "the estate culture is presented in them as part of the all-Russian history" (Ershova, 2002, p. 107). In the article "Lyrics of Bunin and Russian estate culture" L.V. Ershova notes the simultaneous depiction of the extinction of a noble estate and its poeticization in the poetry of I.A.Bunin. As the researcher writes, in the lyrics of IA Bunin, the antithesis "estate-capital" is reflected; the figurative system external to the estate opposes the warmth of the house for the artist, which is a protection and amulet for the lyrical hero.

A different point of view on the image of the house of I.A. Bunin is presented in the work of G.A. Golotina. Considering the theme of the house in the lyrics of I.A. Bunin, the author speaks of the doom of the family nest to destruction and death and believes that if in the early verses the house is a reliable protection in all the vicissitudes of life, then since the beginning of the 1890s I. A. Bunina has never been a prosperous family nest.

N.V. Zaitseva traces the evolution of the image of a noble estate in the prose of I.A. Bunin in 1890 - early 1910s, concludes that the estate in the writer's works is small-scale.

In A.N. Tolstoy's prose, the image of a noble estate is considered in the works of L.V. Ershova (Ershova, 1998), N.S. Avilova (Avilova, 2001), U.K. Abisheva (Abisheva, 2002). But the range of the writer's works, to which the named researchers refer, is limited ("Nikita's Childhood", "The Dreamer (Aggay Korovin)"). Many aspects of the artistic representation of a noble estate in the work of A.N. Tolstoy remain unexplored.

L.V. Ershova in the article "The World of the Russian Estate in the Artistic Interpretation of the Writers of the First Wave of Russian Emigration" notes a strong tendency to idealize the image of a noble estate in AN Tolstoy's Childhood, which is explained, according to the researcher, by the image in the work of the world of childhood ... NS Avilova writes about the opposition in "Nikita's Childhood" of the image of the estate as a reliable guard and protection of the heroes to the image of the surrounding steppe. U.K. Abisheva in his article "Artistic Reception of Russian Estate Prose in the Novel" The Dreamer (Aggay Korovin) "by A. Tolstoy" reveals the traditional and innovative in Tolstoy's understanding of estate life.

The scientific novelty of the dissertation work is determined by the research material (for the analysis, a large amount of works of the late XIX - early XX centuries are involved, in which the image of a noble estate was not previously an object of study); an integrated approach to the study of the image of a noble estate as a phenomenon of Russian culture in the literature of the late 19th - early 20th centuries in general; a historical and typological approach to its study; aspects of consideration of the image of a noble estate, new for literary criticism.

The purpose of the dissertation is to consider the image of a noble estate as one of the central symbols of Russian culture, representative for the modernization of Russian artistic consciousness at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Achievement of this goal presupposes the solution of the following tasks: - to identify and describe the general system of universals, in which the image of the Russian noble estate in the prose of the late XIX - early XX centuries is interpreted and evaluated;

Create a typology of the image of a noble estate in the fiction of the designated period, revealing the main trends in the artistic interpretation of the historical path of Russia in prose at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries; - to analyze the features of the artistic image of a noble estate by the leading directions of the Russian literary process of the late XIX - early XX centuries;

To trace the fate of the moral code of a noble estate in the literature of the first wave of Russian emigration, as well as its influence on the formation of both the oppositional line of Soviet literature and literature biased by the official ideology. The main provisions for the defense:

1. In Russian prose of the late XIX - early XX centuries, there were three concepts of a noble estate: idealizing, critical, dialectical, which together capture the dynamics of the historical process in Russian public consciousness at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries.

2. Each concept forms its own image of the artistic world. Three artistic models of a noble estate are created through the interpretation and assessment by writers of the way of life of the estate in the general system of universals, which are childhood, love, family memory.

3. The image of a noble estate in works with a predominantly idealizing concept is depicted as the embodiment of moral and aesthetic norms that are of decisive importance for Russian culture: stability, the value of the personal principle, a sense of the connection between times, reverence for traditions, life in unity with the earthly and heavenly world.

4. The critical concept destroys the idyllic-mythologized image of the noble estate, debunks the moral foundations of the estate culture. The childhood and love of noble heroes are portrayed by the authors as "distorted"; the burden of consciousness of the inhabitants of a noble estate with family memory is thought to be the cause of its death.

5. The works of the dialectical concept are characterized by a synthesis of an idealizing and critical view of the phenomenon of a noble estate in the history and culture of Russia. In the image of a noble estate, the same spiritual values ​​and foundations are affirmed as in the works of the idealizing concept. However, the world of the estate in the works of this group is no longer ideal, it includes an element of disharmony.

6. In the artistic interpretation of the image of a noble estate by representatives of various literary trends, the main features of the Russian literary process of the late 19th - early 20th centuries were reflected.

7. The moral code of the noble estate left a big mark on the Russian culture of subsequent periods: it had a noticeable influence on the literature of the Russian diaspora, as well as on the formation of both the oppositional line of Soviet literature and literature biased by the official ideology.

The methodological basis of the work is an integrated approach to the study of literary heritage, focused on combining several methods of literary analysis: historical-typological, cultural-contextual, structural-semiotic, mythopoetic. The solution of the research tasks formulated above led to the appeal to the works

M.M. Bakhtin, V.A. Keldysh, B.O. Korman, D.S. Likhachev, A.F. Losev, Yu.M. Lotman, E.M. Meletinsky, V.N. Toporov, V.A. I. Tyupa. The theoretical categories used in the dissertation (artistic image, artistic world, mode of artistry, chronotope, symbol, myth) are interpreted by us in accordance with the developments of the named scientists.

The theoretical significance of the thesis. The thesis enriches the toolkit of literary analysis 1) with new models of chronotopes; 2) a system of new universals, productive for the transitional periods of cultural development; 3) confirms and concretizes the multidirectionality of artistic searches of the literary process of transitional periods using new material as a general pattern.

The practical significance of the work is associated with the possibility of using its materials and results in general lecture courses on the history of Russian literature and special courses on the history of Russian prose, Russian culture of the 19th-20th centuries.

Approbation of work. The main provisions of the dissertation are reflected in 16 publications (7 theses, 9 articles), including in a peer-reviewed printed publication recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation for the publication of works of applicants for scientific degrees, as well as in reports at international, all-Russian, interuniversity conferences in years. Perm, Solikamsk, Izhevsk, St. Petersburg, Moscow.

The structure of the thesis. The work consists of an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion and a bibliography of 220 titles. The first chapter, "The Idealizing Concept of the Noble Estate", examines the principles of idealizing the image of the estate through the approval of moral and aesthetic norms that make up the code of estate life. The second chapter "The Critical Concept of the Noble Estate" is devoted to the consideration of the opposite idealization of the phenomenon: criticism of the noble estate, the debunking of the moral foundations of the estate culture. The third chapter, "The Dialectical Concept of a Noble Estate", analyzes the process of synthesis of idealization and criticism that forms such

Conclusion of the thesis on the topic "Russian Literature", Popova, Olga Alexandrovna

Conclusion

The noble estate is one of the most mysterious phenomena of Russian culture, which is associated with many unresolved issues. In Russian literature of the 18th - 20th centuries, the image of a noble estate was repeatedly recreated, comprehended and rethought. At the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries, this image becomes one of the central in Russian literature, representative for the modernization of Russian artistic consciousness at the turn of the century: the appeal to the image of a noble estate is accompanied by a rethinking by writers of many questions posed by Russian literature and culture of the 18th - 19th centuries, as well as the statement new problems associated with the further development of Russia.

The assessment of the role and place of the noble estate in the history and culture of Russia in prose at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, as we have seen, is far from the same. Its range ranges from absolute idealization to the same absolute criticism, the complete overthrow and debunking of the life foundations of a noble estate. However, to a greater extent, the writers of this period were characterized by an ambivalent attitude towards the noble estate, the simultaneous recognition of its merits and mistakes.

In Russian literature of the late XIX - early XX centuries, as it was shown in our work, three concepts of a noble estate, three views on one of the deepest and most multifaceted, in our opinion, symbols of Russian culture took shape. Idealization and mythologization of the image of a noble estate prevails in the works of the idealizing concept. This concept forms a special image of the artistic world, which is based on the idyllic chronotope of "Home" - as a national form of paradise, the original heavenly abode of the soul. The time of this chronotope is the original time of creation, of heavenly existence, characterized by uniformity and cyclicality. The space of the noble estate in the works of the idealizing concept simultaneously possesses such properties as introversion and extroversion, harmoniously combining a certain isolation and self-sufficiency with openness and boundlessness. In the works of representatives of the idealizing concept, those foundations of the local way of life are highlighted and symbolized, the essence of which is associated with eternal existential principles (B.K. Zaitsev, I.A.Novikov, P.S.Romanov, A.N. Tolstoy). The image of a noble estate in the works of the idealizing concept is accompanied by the motives of childhood as a heavenly, legendary existence, memory, mystery and inviolability of the past, deep kinship with the past. The very idealization of a noble estate in this group of works becomes a guarantee of the preservation of the personal principle, of one's individuality in a rapidly changing world - through the assertion of enduring, from the point of view of writers, life values ​​and foundations: childhood, love, memory, relationship with nature.

A completely different view of the image we are considering is presented in the works of the critical concept, the purpose of which is to destroy the idyllic-mythologized image of a noble estate, to debunk its moral and aesthetic norms. The critical concept, as well as the idealizing one, forms a special image of the artistic world of the estate, which in this case is based on the chronotope of the “dacha”. This chronotope is characterized by temporality and limitedness. The space of the chronotope "dacha" is characterized by extreme isolation, artificiality, impenetrability. In this chronotope, such modes of artistry as comedy, humor, irony find expression. The works of the critical concept emphasize the extinction of life, the economic and spiritual degeneration of the noble manor culture. The nobility is characterized by a tendency towards extreme tyranny, towards intolerable exploitation of the peasantry; noble heroes are overly exalted, incapable of actively transforming reality (A.N. Tolstoy, S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky, S.M. Gorodetsky, A.N.Budishchev, A.V. Amfitheatrov, B.A. Sadovskaya). In the works of a number of representatives of the critical concept, when the myth of the estate as the promised land is destroyed, another myth is created, a kind of anti-myth of a noble estate, in which the estate world appears as a terrible and mysterious, seized by the forces of fate, depriving the heroes of vital energy, leading them to death, often to suicide (B.A. Sadovskaya, S.M. Gorodetsky, S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky).

A peculiar synthesis of idyllic and critical views on the image of a noble estate takes place in the dialectical concept (I.A. Bunin, A.P. Chekhov, N.G. Garin-Mikhailovsky, A. Bely, G.I. Chulkov, S.A. Auslender and etc.). In the works of this concept, such modes of artistry as tragic and dramatic find expression. The artistic world of the estate in the works of this concept is based on the dramatic chronotope "crossroads". The works of the dialectical concept reflect the complexity and contradictoriness of the estate world; the attitude of writers to the estate can be described as "attraction-repulsion". Along with the poeticization of the life of the estate and the recognition of the basic values ​​of the noble culture, the authors show the departure of the estate into the past. In the works of the dialectical concept, the life of a noble estate is included in the broad context of Russian and world culture. The writers introduce into their works many reminiscences and allusions to Russian and Western European art. The rethinking of cultural traditions leads to the understanding that the golden past of the noble estate has outlived itself, but with it the moral and aesthetic values ​​of the noble culture, which have no substitute, also die. This view of the noble estate is marked by the stamp of tragedy.

It would be wrong, in our opinion, to speak of the limitations of any of the concepts presented above. Each concept reveals its own sides of the noble estate, makes its own accents, carries its own truth. In the work of the same writer, different views on the image of a noble estate can be combined, forming a multifaceted view of the author on the problem we are considering (A.P. Chekhov, A.N. Tolstoy, G.I. Chulkov, S.A. Auslender). In the image of the noble estate as a whole, as a phenomenon of the Russian historical reality of the 18th - early 20th centuries, from our point of view, the general feature of the Russian soul was reflected: Russia is “contradictory, antinomical,” and one can learn its secret, as N.A. Berdyaev, only immediately recognizing its “eerie inconsistency” (Berdyaev, 1997, p. 228).

At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, as we have shown, writers of a wide variety of views, belonging to different literary trends and associations, paid increased attention to the image of a noble estate. An analysis of all the main options for depicting the estate allows us to raise the question of the peculiarities of the embodiment of this image within the framework of various artistic trends of the late 19th - early 20th centuries: naturalistic tradition, realistic, directions of symbolism, acmeism, writers of the "intermediate type" (Keldysh).

The naturalistic tradition is characterized by a critical attitude to the image of the Russian noble estate and to noble heroes. We refer to the naturalistic tradition as such works considered in our work as "Heat-color" by A.V. Amfitheatrov and "Breaks of Love" by A.N. Budishchev. novel

A.V. Amfiteatrova, we rank among the designated tradition, in particular, following

B.L. Lvov-Rogachevsky, who noted in the article "A Writer Without Invention" (1911) the excessive naturalism of the writer's artistic manner. The depiction of a noble estate in the above-mentioned works by A.V. Amfiteatrov and A.N. Budishchev is not individualized; in the center of the work is not so much the personal collision, the inner world of the hero, as the imprinting of a certain social (noble) environment, society as such. The purpose of these works is to study this social group (nobility) using the achievements of advanced science, using scientific terminology (novel by A.V. Amfiteatrov). By the end of the works of these writers, a certain mental illness characteristic of a given social group is revealed and its diagnosis is made. According to A.V. Amfiteatrov and A.N.Budishchev, the root of the mental deviations of the nobility lies not in socio-historical or existential areas (as it happens in the works of realism or modernism), but in the natural laws of nature and human physiology.

The most multifaceted image of a Russian noble estate in the literature of the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries was embodied in the works of the realistic tradition. In the works of realist writers, all the concepts of a noble estate that we have considered are reflected: idealizing, critical, dialectical. The attitude of writers to the image of a noble estate is determined, in our opinion, both by the problems sharpened in the work, the tasks that the author sets for himself, the time and place of writing the work, and the creative personality of the author. The artistic interpretation of the image of a noble estate by the writers of the realistic tradition reflected the main features of realism at the beginning of the 20th century. The sharpening in the image of a noble estate of socio-historical problems is combined with problems of a universal, substantial nature (D.V. Grigorovich, N.G. Garin-Mikhailovsky, I.A. Bunin, A.N. Tolstoy, S.N. Sergeev-Tsensky ). The widespread use of subject details, a certain determinism of character by the historical setting is complemented by an appeal to the poetics of other directions (the use of symbolism, impressionistic imagery, strengthening of the lyrical principle).

A new, although prepared largely by Russian culture and literature of past centuries, the understanding of the noble estate takes place in the works of the Symbolist writers. In their works, the image of a noble estate is largely devoid of concrete historical content and becomes a deep philosophically loaded symbol. So in the novels of A. Bely "The Silver Dove" and "Petersburg" the image of a noble estate is considered by the author in connection with the problem of the collision of the West and the East in Russia, as well as with the problem of opposition in the culture of the Dionysian and Apollonian principles. In the works of the mystical symbolist G.I. Chulkov, the noble estate becomes a special model of the universe, which has its own internal laws and has its own life, different from other worlds. The main essence of this world is, from the point of view of G.I. Chulkov, the indissoluble unity in it of the life of the past and the present - not only of the noble culture, but of the entire human race.

The image of a noble estate as a model of the Universe is also vividly presented in the works of such a symbolist as I.A. Novikov. In contrast to the works of A. Bely and G. I. Chulkov, in which the spirit of destruction and gradual fading blows over the image of a noble estate, the idea of ​​a noble estate as a special harmoniously arranged world is characteristic of I. A. Novikov's work. In the noble estate of I.A. Novikov, the fullness of being is embodied with its joys and sufferings, dreams and reality, gains and losses, meetings and partings, where the human soul can develop harmoniously and holistically. It is in such a world, which is the image of a noble estate in the writer's works, that the basic essential laws of the world order can be fully embodied.

The artistic interpretation of the image of a noble estate also acquires its own peculiarities in the work of acmeists. The principles of Acmeism find expression, in our opinion, in such works considered in our work as The Dreamers (1912), The Dead Woman in the House (1913) by MA Kuzmin and The Terrible Estate (1913) by S.М. Gorodetsky. In comprehending the image of a noble estate for M.A. Kuzmin and S.M. Gorodetsky, as well as for the Symbolists, socio-historical issues, which are important for realists, are insignificant. Unlike the works of Symbolists and Realists, in the above-mentioned works of MA Kuzmin and SM Gorodetsky there is no symbolization of the image of a noble estate ("A = A"). As acmeists, M.A. Kuzmin and S.M. Gorodetsky are more interested in the aesthetic and cultural content of the image we are considering. Descriptions of the manor park, halls and furnishings of the manor house serve as aesthetic signs of the outgoing era of "noble nests".

M.A.Kuzmin and S.M. Gorodetsky are united by a negative attitude towards the image of a noble estate. In the images of noble heroes, writers, as negative, emphasize detachment from real life reality, illusion, addiction to dreams, passion for theosophy, occult sciences, magic. All this, from the point of view of M.A. Kuzmin and S.M. Gorodetsky, takes the heroes away from real life and deprives them of the joy of being. This is the position of M.A. Kuzmin and

S.M. Gorodetsky differs from the opinion of the Symbolists, who see the possession of noble heroes with secret spiritual knowledge and skills as the only opportunity for their harmonious existence in the world (F.K. Sologub, G.I. Chulkov). In the works of M.A. Kuzmin and S.M. Gorodetsky, the image of a noble estate, saturated with an atmosphere of mystery, fatal predetermination, the relationship between the world of the dead and the world of the living, is contrasted with real life with its freedom, beauty, joy. The exit (more precisely, the escape) of the heroes from the estate (or the estate-dacha) is equated in the works of writers with the return from death to life ("The Deceased in the House" by MA Kuzmin, "The Terrible Estate" by SM Gorodetsky).

The image of a noble estate is also embodied in the works of writers of the "intermediate type" (Keldysh), namely in the prose of BK Zaitsev. In various works of the writer, both the idyllic ("Dawn") and the dialectical ("Far Land") view of the Russian noble estate were reflected. The works of B.K. Zaitsev are characterized by the symbolization and mythologization of the image of a noble estate, which in the writer's artistic system is associated with the image of Eden, the Garden of Eden, the Promised Land, the original womb of the human soul. The category of culture plays a significant role in the formation of the image of a noble estate in the prose of B.K. Zaitsev. The world of the noble estate of B.K. Zaitsev reflects the spiritual potential of Russian and world culture, the relationship with which is constantly felt in the way of thinking and behavior of the noble heroes of the writer.

In the image of a noble estate in Russian prose of the late 19th - early 20th centuries, in our opinion, the main processes characteristic of the historical and philosophical life of Russia in the era of changes are reflected. A change in the way of life, paradigms of thinking, a change in the traditional role of classes in the history of Russia, attitudes towards tradition, a change in the code of values ​​- all this is reflected in the image of a noble estate. The analysis of the concepts of the estate highlighted in the dissertation testifies to the actualization for Russian society at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries, along with the socio-historical problems of issues of the complex inner nature of man, the role of the irrational in man, the relationship between social and metaphysical principles, personality and collective, the problem of cosmism. Being in many respects correlated with the literary tradition of the 19th century, the image of a noble estate at the turn of the century significantly changes its nature: the specific historical content of this image is complemented by the universal one.

In Russian prose of the late 19th - early 20th centuries, in the works of the idealizing and dialectical concept of a noble estate, moral and aesthetic values ​​inherent in both Russian culture as a whole and unique ones characteristic only of a noble estate were concentrated. The ideas of the House as the eternal abode of the human soul, the unity of earthly and heavenly existence, freedom and value of the individual, harmony with the universe, deep interconnection with all living things, continuity and memory - ancestral and cultural - were correlated with the image of a noble estate. But the irreversible vector of the historical path of Russia is also fixed, which enters into dialectical relations with these values.

After the 1917 revolution, the moral and aesthetic foundations of the life of a noble estate fell into disgrace. The fate of a noble estate in the Soviet era is well known: evictions, arrests and murders of former estate owners, destruction of estates, their use as resting places for the new government elite, and the like. Debunking the noble estate and its moral and aesthetic norms became a form of class struggle, a way of establishing a new ideology. However, the comprehension of the estate in Russian prose at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries had, in our opinion, a significant impact on the further development of both Soviet literature and, of course, the literature of the Russian diaspora.

In the literature of the first wave of Russian emigration, the idealizing concept of a noble estate is most developed. Away from Russia, the myth of the estate as the promised land, the primordial source of being (I.A.Bunin, B.K.Zaitsev, V.V. Nabokov, P.N. Krasnov) is finally formed. The organizing motives of this myth are the motives of childhood as the childhood of being, morning as the morning of being, creativity (through creativity, connection and connection with the Creator of the world), clan continuity, the lost paradise, which are partly characteristic of the works of the idealizing concept in prose of the early 20th century. In the manor myth, the theme of creativity manifests itself brighter than before. Creativity is associated by its nature with the primordial source of being, in which it receives its beginning and vital impulse; through creativity the Creator reveals Himself to the artist (I.A.Bunin, B.K. Zaitsev). The image of a noble estate is similar in its semantics to the image of Russia. The estate and Russia are equally associated with the feeling of silence, with the images of mother and birch, and most importantly, they merge in the image of a lost and desecrated Motherland. Russia and the estate remain in the past, they live only in the soul; and since the soul breathes with eternity, the past acquires immortality (I.A. Bunin, B.K. Zaitsev, I.S.Shmelev).

As for Russian literature of the XX century proper, it was left, first of all, by the artistic model of the critical concept of a noble estate. A critical look at the values ​​of a noble estate contributed to the emergence of a new positive hero in literature, which was formed according to the logic of direct repulsion from the hero of a noble estate, in a direct dispute with him. This dispute constantly reminds us of the old hero, does not let us forget about him. A noble hero, possessing internal complexity, inconsistency, striving to resolve many everyday issues (which was shown by us when considering the works of the idealizing and dialectical concept), is perceived as a class enemy and is emphatically supplanted by a hero of proletarian origin, devoid of mental reflection and possessing such qualities as immutability , certainty, straightforwardness (Sinyavsky, 1990: 59-60). In the image of the new hero, blind devotion to the idea of ​​a complete rejection of the past, selflessness, readiness to “lay down one's life” for the working class are poeticized; such a hero appreciates the idea more than the person, prefers the general to the individual (D. Furmanov, A. Serafimovich, A. Fadeev, N. Ostrovsky). Personal values ​​in the literature of socialist realism are replaced by collective values. The main criterion for evaluating a hero is not his spiritual essence, but his ideological position (F. Gladkov, V. Kochetov). There is a rejection of such important categories for the noble estate as family memory and love as the main meaning of life. The entire existence of the heroes is aimed at building a bright future, comprehended in the doctrine of Soviet ideology. In the 1930s, this feature finds vivid expression in the development of the so-called "production prose"; instead of a secluded "corner" of a noble estate, the world space, united by revolution and the construction of a new life, bursts into fiction (F. Gladkov, F. Panferov, M. Shaginyan, V. Kataev, N. Ostrovsky).

However, the model of the idealizing concept of a noble estate did not remain unperceived by Russian literature of the 20th century. Moral and aesthetic criteria for assessing personality and lifestyle, marked with an idealizing concept, are especially recognizable in the works of M. Bulgakov "The White Guard", "Days of the Turbins" and B. Pasternak "Doctor Zhivago" (the value of the family, personality, a certain cultural and psychological makeup) ... But, paradoxically, traces of the named concept of a noble estate can be found, in our opinion, in the literature of socialist realism. We see them in the actualization of the spiritual aspect of love, the ideals of friendship, loyalty and devotion to the person, the word, the Motherland (F. Gladkov, A. Kaverin, B. Lavrenev, A. Arbuzov, A. Fadeev, A. Tvardovsky, B. Polevoy, etc. .). The values ​​of the idealizing concept of a noble estate are manifested, in addition, in the importance of childhood in the life of a person (albeit different from the childhood of noble heroes), the phenomenon of the family, which, although polemic to the ideal of the noble family and has completely different social roots (working dynasties), plays an important role in the artistic systems of a number of writers (V. Kochetov). The moral and aesthetic aspects, marked by the idealizing concept of a noble estate, are also recognizable in sharpening the problem of the relationship between man and nature, preserving the beauty and harmony of the world order (L. Leonov).

In addition, a third tendency existed in Russian literature of the 20th century, genetically related, in our opinion, to the dialectical concept of a noble estate. This tendency is characterized by a certain synthetism, which finds expression, in particular, in the prose of A. Platonov. A. Platonov, on the one hand, repels himself from the culture of the nobility. His hero is a man from the people who accepts the revolution, who, in comparison with the hero of a noble estate, has a completely different social experience, different ideals. But, on the other hand, for A. Platonov, understanding the complexity of the inner world of a person, rejection of the herd, and the search for beauty are very important. For all the aspiration of the Platonic hero to the new world, he cannot go to it without recourse to memory. It is the recollections of childhood, albeit different from childhood in a noble estate, that become for the protagonist of Plato's "Chevengur" the key to comprehending the world.

In the Russian literature of the 1960s-1970s, the moral code of the noble estate, its values ​​and priorities is revived - only in the life of people of a different social status: the intelligentsia, the peasantry. The writers sharpen the problem of human degradation, the loss of life values ​​and foundations; there is a desire to preserve, remember, restore, return the insulted, forgotten, lost, lost (M. Prishvin, "lieutenant prose", K. Paustovsky, V. Shukshin, S. Zalygin, Y. Trifonov, A. G. Bitov).

In fiction, in particular, the motive of the lost home appears (Y. Trifonov), the problem of preserving the personality, individuality in the world of collectivism and socialist transformations (V. Tendryakov) is emphasized. Often the reason for the loss of one's own “I” is associated in the literature of the 1960s-1970s with the loss of memory, without which, from the point of view of writers, there can be no real, real life (Yu. Trifonov).

During this period in Russian literature, the view on such concepts as the nobility and aristocracy is changing. The nobility is interpreted by writers and poets not as a social status, but as spirituality, intelligence; It is in the sphere of the spiritual (love, friendship) that the priorities of the poets of the 60s lie (B. Okudzhava, B. Akhmadulina, N. Matveeva, Y. Moritz). The theme of the intelligentsia in fiction is associated with the problem of a person's moral choice, preserving memory, relationships between fathers and children, loyalty, purity of friendship and love (Y. Trifonov, A. Bitov, D. Granin, B. Okudzhava, B. Akhmadulina).

In Russian prose of the 1970-1990s, the problems of deformation of society, disrespect for man, the cruelty of the modern world and the loneliness of man in it are sharpened; writers oppose the moral, spiritual impoverishment of the individual, stand up for the revival of his inner wealth, for the restoration of the system of moral values, which, in our opinion, are directly related to the moral and aesthetic code of the noble estate (L. Petrushevskaya, V. Tokareva, T. Tolstaya, Dombrovsky, V. Makanin).

In the literature of the 1990s-2000s, the motive of childhood, characteristic of the works of the dialectical concept of a noble estate, reappears as a paradise, legendary existence - irretrievably lost, however (V. Lorchenkov).

The departure after the revolution from Russian literature and culture of the image of a noble estate as the main symbol of the Promised Land led to the need to form a replacement for it. On the one hand, as the image of paradise was seen in the literature of the Soviet period, a kind of vague future, towards which all the positive heroes of "socialist realism" were directed. On the other hand, in the 1970s the image of a village takes over the functions of the Promised Land, which is reflected in “village prose” (V. Rasputin, V. Astafiev, V. Belov, F. Abramov).

The images of a noble estate and a village are brought together by the priority of memory in the lives of heroes, their unity with nature, and their relationship to time. In the works of the idealizing concept, we noted such a feature of the estate time as regularity, slowness, cyclicality, which, according to the writers, was a way of confronting a rapidly changing world and preserving one's individuality and a trace in it. A similar attitude to time is also characteristic of the heroes of “village prose”, in which a measured, calm, thoughtful rural existence, allowing to preserve his soul, is opposed to the accelerated, subordinate to the technique of city life, where a person has no time to think about his spiritual basis in a hurry.

However, there are significant differences between the images of a noble estate and a village. If, as we noted in the first chapter, the space of a noble estate in Russian prose at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries is characterized by simultaneous introversion and extroversion, self-directedness and, at the same time, a deep relationship with the whole universe, which makes the estate a repository of not only the ancestral, but also common cultural memory, the idyllic space of the village turns out to be self-sufficient, separated from the surrounding world, essentially not connected with it ("Farewell to Matera" by V. Rasputin).

The difference between the image of a village and a noble estate testifies to the fact that an equivalent replacement in Russian literature and culture of one symbol of the promised land with another still did not occur. According to V.G. Shchukin, the dacha finally takes over the functions of a noble estate in Russian fiction of the 20th century (Shchukin, 1997: 212). However, we take the liberty of disagreeing with this opinion. In our opinion, between a noble estate and a dacha in the fiction of both the 19th and 20th centuries, there were and there are many differences, the main of which is again the connection between the image of the estate, in contrast to the dacha, with the ancestral and cultural memory, which makes the human personality protected from all the vicissitudes and cataclysms of world history.

Today, the life of a noble estate is moving further and further away from us, and along with it, the moral and aesthetic values ​​that it kept in itself disappear and are forgotten. However, these values ​​are necessary for the further full-fledged existence of each of us individually, and for the revival and development of the entire Russian culture. The problem of loss of memory, one's own self, one's roots and life foundations has not weakened in recent decades, but has become even more acute and urgent. And, apparently, in order to somehow solve the problems facing us, we need to turn our face to history, remember, look at it, see its true undistorted image and only in deep interconnection with it move on, because, according to M. .Gefter, “it's still a delusion that the future is always ahead. In fact, people, nations, civilizations have long been moving forward with their backs, facing the same without return and without oblivion. And now, especially now, the future has a memory in the demiurges ”(Gefter, 1996: 80).

And the Russian estate in the literature of the late XIX - early XX centuries reminds us of this.

List of dissertation research literature Candidate of Philology Popova, Olga Aleksandrovna, 2007

1. Amphitheaters, A.V. Collected cit .: in Ut. / A.V. Amphitheater. - M .: NPK Intelvak, 2000.

2. The Apocrypha of Ancient Christians: Research, Texts, Commentaries. - M .: Publishing house "Mysl", 1989.

3. Artsybashev, M.P. Shadows of the morning / M.P. Artsybashev. - M .: Contemporary, 1990.

4. Auslender, S.A. The heart of a warrior / S.A. Auslender. - Petrograd, 1916.

5. Auslender, S.A. Stories. Book 2. / S.A. Auslender. - SPb., 1912.

6. Balmont, K.D. Collected cit .: in 2 volumes - M .: Mozhaisk-Terra, 1994.

7. White, A. Silver Dove: A Tale in Seven Chapters / Prepared. text, entered. article and comment. M. Kozmenko. - M .: Art. lit., 1989.

8. Budishchev, A. Breaks of Love. - M., 1914.

9. Bunin, I.A. Great dope. - M .: Top secret, 1997. Yu. Bunin, IA From the "Notebook" // Literary heritage. - T. 84.

10. Book 1-M., 1973. -S.388. P. Bunin, I. A. Collected cit .: in 6 volumes - M .: Fiction, 1987-1988.

11. Garin-Mikhailovsky, N.G. Childhood Themes. High school students. - L., 1988.1 Z. Garin-Mikhailovsky, N.G. Collected cit .: in 5 volumes - T. 3 .- M., 1957. M. Gogol, N.V. Collected cit .: in 9 volumes - M .: Russian book, 1994.

12. Gorodetsky, S. Selected works: in 2 volumes - Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1987. - vol. 2.

13. Gorodetsky, S. Old nests. Stories and stories. - SPb .: Publishing House of Suvorin, 1914.

14. Grigorovich, D.V. Works in 3 volumes. Vol. 2. Stories and stories. Dramatic works. - M .: Fiction, 1988.

15. Gusev, V. Ghosts of the Count's Estate: A Story. - M .: ZAO Publishing house EKS-MO-Press, 1999.

16. Dostoevsky, F.M. Little Hero // Spring Waters. Stories of Russian Writers about Love. - Perm, 1987 .-- p. 139-176. 20. Zaitsev, B.K. Collected works: in 5 volumes (6-9 volumes additional) - M .: Russian book, 1999-2000.

17. Kuzmin, M.A. Poems and prose. - M .: Contemporary, 1989.

18. Kuzmin, M.A. Prose and aesthetics: in 3x t. - Vol. 1. Prose 1906-1912 - M .: Agraf, 1999.

19. Livshits, B. One-and-a-half-eyed Sagittarius: Poems, translations, memoirs, -L., 1989.

20. Lozinsky, V. Enchanted estate: Roman / per. from Polish O. Smirnova; Art. and approx. O. Smirnova. - M .: Fiction, 1984.

21. Lorchenkov, V. Manor of the Crazy / V. Lorchenkov. - M .: ACT Publishing House LLC; SPb .: OOO Astrel-SPb Publishing House, 2004.

22. Losev, A.F. Tchaikovsky Trio // www.ocf.org./orthodoxpage/reading/ St. Pachomius /.

23. Muizhel, V.V. Dacha. Story. - Petrograd, 1919.

24. Muyzhl, V.V. Stories. T. 1. - Petersburg, 1920.

25. Novikov, I.A. Golden crosses // www.ru/ruslit.novikov ia

26. Novikov, I.A. Golden Crosses: Novel. Stories and stories. - Mtsensk, 2004.31 Pasternak, B. Poems and poems. - M .: Hood. literature, 1988.

27. Platonov, A.P. Chevengur. - M .: Higher. shk., 1991.

28. Pushkin, A.S. Full collection op: в17 t. - M .: Sunday, 1995-1996.

29. Rasputin, V.G. Stories and stories. - M .: Contemporary, 1985.

30. Remizov, A. Cuckoo // Lepta. - 1995. - No. 25. - p. 234-236.

31. Romanov, P.S. Stories and stories. - M .: Art. lit., 1990.

32. Sadovskaya, B.A. Swan clicks. - M .: Soviet writer, 1990.

33. Sergeev Tsenskiy, S.N. Collected op: 12 t. - M .: Pravda, 1967.

34. Sergeev Tsenskiy, S.N. Hot Summer: Short Stories. The story. Novel. - M., 1987.

35. Sologub, F. The Created Legend. - M .: Contemporary, 1991.

36. Sologub, F. Poems. - Leningrad department: Soviet writer, 1978.

37. Surguchev, I. Trinity Day // Lepta. - 1995. - No. 25. - p. 115-119.

38. Tolstoy, A.N. Selected works: In 6 volumes. T. 1. - M .: Soviet writer, 1950.

39. Tolstoy, A.N. Collected cit .: in 10 volumes - M .: Fiction, 1982.

40. Trifonov, Yu.V. The glow of the fire. The Disappearance: A Documentary Narrated, a Novel. - M .: Soviet writer, 1988.

41. Trifonov, Yu.V. Collected op. in 4 volumes. Vol.2. Stories. - M .: Art. letter. , 1986.

42. Turgenev, I.S. Collected Works. In 12 volumes. - M .: Art. lit., 1976-1978.

43. Chekhov, A.P. Collected op. in 6 volumes - M .: Lexica, 1995.

44. Chekhov, A, P. Full collection op. and letters: in 30 volumes. Op. in 18 volumes - Moscow: Nauka, 1974-1978.

45. Chulkov, G. Margarita Charova. Part I-V // Monthly. lit. and popul.-scientific. app-lodge. to the "Niva". - 1912 .-- v. 1. -s.619-634.51. Chulkov, G. Margarita Charova. 4.VI-X // Monthly lit. and popul.-scientific. app-lodge. to the "Niva". - 1912 .-- T.N. -s. 5-26.

46. ​​Chulkov, G. Sunflowers // [email protected] com. - 2003.-p. 1-4.

47. Chulkov, G. Sister // [email protected] com. - 2003.-p. 1-5.

48. Chulkov, G. Margarita Charova. Part I-V // Monthly. lit. and popul.-scientific. app-lodge. to the "Niva". - 1912 .-- v. 1. - p. 619-634.

49. Chulkov, G. Margarita Charova. 4.VI-X // Monthly lit. and popul.-scientific. app-lodge. to "Niva". - 1912. - so N. - p. 5-26.

50. Chulkov, G. Desert. Stories. Compositions. - SPb., B.g.

51. Shmelev, I.S. Collected cit .: in 5 volumes, vol. 6 (additional). - M .: Russian book, 1998-1999.

52. Yasinsky, I.I. Grisha Gorbachev // Writers of Chekhov's time. Selected works of writers 80-90-ies .: in 2 volumes - v. 1. - M .: Hood. lit., 1982.1 .. Criticism and literary criticism

53. Abisheva, U.K. Artistic reception of Russian estate prose in the story "The Dreamer (Aggey Korovin)" by A. Tolstoy // Pushkin readings. - SPb., 2002. - 2002. - S. 184-195.

54. Avilova, N.S. The image of a steppe estate ("Nikita's childhood") // Russian language. - 2001. - No. 27. - p. 15-16. - App. to gas. "The first of September".

55. Eichenwald, Y. Boris Sadovskaya ("Swan Clicks" and "Admiralty Needle") // Eichenwald, Y. Words about words. Critical articles. - Petrograd: Publishing house of the former. M.V. Popova, 1916 .-- p. 97-101.

56. Alpatov, V.M. Inversion // Linguistics. Big encyclopedic dictionary. - 1998 .-- p. 176.

57. A-vich, N. A. Budishchev. The kinks of love. Sat. stories // Free Journal. - 1914. -No. 10. -s. 123-124.

58. Barkovskaya, N.V. The poetics of the symbolist novel. - Yekaterinburg: Ural, state. ped. un-t, 1996.

59. Bakhtin, M.M. Questions of literature and aesthetics. - M .: Fiction, 1975.

60. Bakhtin, M.M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity.- Moscow: Art, 1979.

61. Without signature. Boris Sadovskaya. Cast iron pattern. Stories. M .: Alcyone, 1911 // Russian wealth. - 1911. - No. 6. - dep. II. - with. 148-150.

62. Bely, A. Sergei Auslender. Golden apples. M., 1908 // Libra. - No. 6. - p. 68-69.

63. Blok, A. Knight-Monk // http://www.vehi.net/soloviev/ablock.html

64. Bochaeva, N.G. The world of childhood in the creative mind and artistic practice of I.A. Bunin. Abstract of the thesis. dis. ... Cand. philol. sciences. Specialty 10.01.01. Russian literature. - Yelets, 1999.

65. Vinogradov, V.V. Essays on the history of the Russian literary language of the 17th and 18th centuries // M .: Uchpedgiz, 1938.

66. B.JI. (V. Lvov -?). Georgy Chulkov. Stories. Book. 2. Publishing house "Rosehip", 1910 // Modern world. - 1910. -№ 8, -s. 104-106.

67. Volkenstein, V.M. A. Budishchev. "Black devil". Stories // Modern World. - 1909. -№3, -s. 127.

68. Gasparov, M.L. Benedict Livshits. Between the elements and culture // Gasparov M.L. About Russian poetry. - SPb., 2001 .-- S. 95-113.

69. Gvozdev, A. Literary chronicle (about Kuzmin) // Northern notes. - 1915. -№ 11-12. -s. 233-239.

70. Gvozdev, A. Literary Chronicle (about Sadovsky) // Northern Notes. - 1915, -№ 11-12. -s. 239-241.

71. Gvozdev, A. S. Auslender. "Warrior's Heart" // Northern Notes. - 1916. - No. 11. - p. 125-126.

72. Gvozdev, A. Literary Chronicle (about the works of Count AN Tolstoy)) // Northern Notes. - 1915. - No. 11-12. - p. 241-242.

73. Gershenzon, M.O. S. Auslander. Golden apples. M., 1908.// Bulletin of Europe. - 1908. - No. 7. - p. 340-342.

74. Golotina, G.A. The theme of the house in the lyrics of I.A. Bunin. - Murmansk, 1985.

75. Hoffman, V. Al.N. Budishchev. Revolt of conscience. Novel // Modern World. - 1909. - No. 7. - p.192-193.

76. Gumilev, N. Sergei Auelender. Stories. Book. 2. SPb., 1912 // Monthly literature. and popularly scientific. app. to the "Niva". - 1912 .-- v. III. - with. 485-486.

77. Ershova, JI.B. Lyrics of Bunin and Russian estate culture // Philological sciences. - 1999. - No. 5. - p. 33-41.

78. Ershova, JI.B. The world of the Russian estate in the artistic interpretation of the writers of the first wave of Russian emigration // Philological sciences. 1998. №1.-p. 23-30.

79. Ershova, JI.B. Noble estate (From the history of Russian culture) / Educational. pos. for foreign students. - M .: Dialogue - Moscow State University, 1998.

80. Ershova, JI.B. Images-symbols of the estate world in the prose of I.A. Bunin // Bulletin of RUDN. Ser. Russian language for non-philologists. Theory and practice. - 2002. -№3. -with. 104-109.

81. Esin, A.B. Time and space // Introduction to literary criticism: Uch. pos. / L.V. Chernets, V.E.Khalizev, A.Ya. Esalnek and others, Ed. L.V. Chernets. - 2nd ed. revised and add. - M .: Higher school, 2006. - p. 182-197.

82. Zhirmunsky, V.M. Metaphor in the poetics of Russian Symbolists // Zhirmunsky V.M. Poetics of Russian poetry. - SPb., Alphabet classics, 2001 .-- p. 162-197.

83. Zaitseva, N.V. The concept of a small estate in creativity

84. Ilyin, I.A. The work of I.A. Bunin // Ilyin I.A. Collection of works: in 10 volumes - M.: Russian book, 1993. - T. 6. Book 1. - p. 210-270.

85. Ilyushechkina, E.V. Ancient tradition in the poem "Fiesolan nymphs" of the century by D. Boccaccio // Pastoral in the system of culture: Metamorphoses of genre in dialogue with time: Sat. scientific. works. Resp. ed. Yu.G. Kruglov. - M .: RITS "Alpha" MGOPU, 1999. - p. 5-9.

86. Keldysh, V.A. Russian realism at the beginning of the 20th century. - M .: Nauka, 1975.

87. Kleimenova, G.V. Sergeev-Tsensky's poem "Sadness of the fields" (On the problem of ideological and artistic originality) // Proceedings of the Irkutsk state. un-that. T. XXXIII. Ser. literary. and criticism. Issue 4. - Irkutsk, 1964. - p. 107-130.

88. Kolobaeva, JI.A. The concept of personality in Russian literature at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. - M .: Publishing house of Moscow State University, 1990.

89. Koltonovskaya, E. New in literature // Russian thought. - 1916. - No. 12. - dep. II, pp. 70-84.

90. Koretskaya, I. V. Symbolism // Russian literature of the turn of the century (1890 - early 1920s). Book 1. - IMLI RAN, Moscow: "Heritage", 2000. - P.688-731.

91. Box, N. "Noble nests" in modern fiction // Requests for life. - 1912. - No. 21. - with. 1263-1268.

92. L.V. Georgy Chulkov. Stories. Book. 1. Publishing house "Rosehip". SPb., 1909 // Modern world. - 1909. - No. 5. - p. 139-140.

93. Legonkova, V. B. The image of a noble estate in the works of S.T.Aksakov, I.S. Turgenev and L.N. Tolstoy // "Blessed are the first steps." Sat. works of young researchers. - Magnitogorsk, 1991. - Issue. 2. - p. 3-9.

94. Likhachev, D.S. The inner world of a work of art // Questions of literature. - 1968. - No. 8. - p.

95. Lundberg, E. The Word. Sat. first. ("The Gullies" by A.N. Tolstoy) // Testaments. - 1914. - № 1. - Bible. - p.51.

96. Lvov-Rogachevsky, V. Publishing Association of Writers. Sat. 1. Yves. Bunin. Night conversation. Sergeev-Tsensky. Teddy bear. - Gr. Al. Tolstoy. Lame master. - SPb., 1912 // p. 327-329.

97. Lvov-Rogachevsky, V. A writer without invention (about the novels of A.V. Amfiteatrov) // Modern world. - 1911. - No. 9. - with. 240-265.

98. Lvov-Rogachevsky, V.L. G. Chulkov. Stories, book. I-II // Modern world. - 1909. -№5, - t. P - С.139-140.

99. Makushinsky, A. The Rejected Bridegroom, or the Main Myth of Russian Literature of the 19th century. // Questions of philosophy. - 2003. - No. 7. - p.

100. Maltsev, Y. Ivan Bunin (1870-1953). - Sowing, 1994.

101. Markov, V.F. Conversation about Kuzmin's prose // Markov V.F. On freedom in poetry: Articles, essays, miscellaneous. - SPb .: Publishing house of Chernyshev, 1994. - p. 163169.

102. Markovich, V.M. I.S. Turgenev and the Russian realistic novel of the 19th century. -L., 1982.

103. Mikhailova, M.V. Words of forgiveness and love from Alexei Khristoforov // www.ru/ruslit.novikov ia

104. Mikhailova, M.V. The work of I.A. Novikov in pre-revolutionary criticism // I.A. Novikov in the circle of contemporary writers. Sat. scientific. Art., dedicated. 125th anniversary of the birth of the writer. - Oryol Mtsensk, 2003 .-- p. 29-50.

105. Nikolina, N.A. "Simplicity of form and complete sincerity of tone" (Compositional and stylistic originality in the story "The Childhood of the Theme" by NG Garin-Mikhailovsky) // Russian language in school. - 1997. - No. 1. - p. 70-76.

106. Nikonenko, S. Science of vision P. Romanov // Romanov P.S. Stories and stories.-M., 1990. - p. 3-18.

107. Oksenov, I. Boris Sadovskaya. Admiralty needle. Stories. Petrograd, 1915 // New magazine for everyone. - 1915. - № 12. - p. 60-61.

108. Osipova, N.O. Pastoral motives in Russian poetry of the first third of the XX century // Pastoral in the system of culture: Metamorphoses of genre in dialogue with time: Sat. scientific. works. Resp. ed. Yu.G. Kruglov. - M .: RITS "Alpha" MGOPU, 1999. -p. 100-112.

109. Pascharian, N.T. "Pastoral Age" in French poetry of the 18th century // Pastoral in the system of culture: Metamorphoses of genre in dialogue with time: Sat. scientific. works. Resp. ed. Yu.G. Kruglov. - M .: RITS "Alpha" MGOPU, 1999. - p. 36-47.

110. Polonsky, G. Ya. Village in modern literature // Requests for life. - 1912. - No. 38. - p. 2161-2168.

111. Popova, G.N. The world of the Russian province in the novels of I.A. Goncharov. Auto-ref. to apply for an account. step. Cand. philol. sciences. - Yelets, 2002.

112. Razina, A.V. The role of the estate in the formation of poetics and aesthetics Yves. Bunin // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2003. - p. 426-435.

113. Saakyants A. Prose of the late Bunin // Bunin I.A. Collected works: In 6 T. - M., 1987. - T. 5. - S. 571-593.

115. Szilard, JI. Andrey Bely // Russian literature of the turn of the century (1890s - early 1920s). Book 2. IMLI RAN. - M .: Heritage, 2001 .-- pp. 144-189.

116. Sinyavsky, A. (Abram Tertz). What is socialist realism // http://annie.sancheg.ru/index.php?id=&menu=files

117. Sinyavsky, A. (Abram Tertz). What is socialist realism (Fragments of work) // Getting rid of mirages. Socialist realism today. - M .: Soviet writer, 1990 .-- p.54-79.

118. Skiba, V.A., Chernets, L.V. Artistic image // Introduction to literary criticism: Uch. pos. / L.V. Chernets, V.E.Khalizev, A.Ya. Esalnek and others, Ed. L.V. Chernets. - 2nd ed. revised and add. - M .: Higher school, 2006 .-- p.22-33.

119. Slivitskaya, O. V. "Heightened Sense of Life": The World of Ivan Bunin. - M .: RGGU, 2004.

120. Spivak. R.S. New religious consciousness and poetics of life-creation in the novel by IA Novikov "Golden Crosses" // Bible and Scientific Culture: Inter-university. Sat. scientific. Art. / Perm. un-t - Perm, 2005. - p.57-60.

121. Spivak, R.S. On the peculiarities of the artistic structure of the story "Sukhodol" by IA Bunin // Method, style, poetics of Russian literature of the XX century. - Vladimir, 1997. -S.45-55.

122. Spivak, R.S. Russian philosophical lyrics. 1910s. - M., 2005.

123. Spivak, R.S. Russian philosophical lyrics. 1910s. I. Bunin, A. Blok, V. Mayakovsky: Textbook / R.S. Spivak. - M .: Flinta: Science, 2003.

124. Tarasov, B.N. Childhood in the creative minds of Russian writers // Literature at school. - 1995. - № 4-5. - p. 19-23.

125. Tyupa, V.I. Literature as a kind of activity: the theory of artistic discourse // Theory of literature: Uch. pos. for students philologist, fac. higher. study. institutions: 2 volumes / ed. ND Tamarchenko. - t. 1. - M .: Publishing house. center "Academy", 2004. - p. 16-104.

126. Hansen-Loewy, A. Russian Symbolism. The system of poetic motives. Early Symbolism. - SPb .: "Academic project", 1999.

127. Chernetz, L.V. Types of image // Introduction to literary criticism: Uch. pos. / L.V. Chernets, V.E.Khalizev, A.Ya. Esalnek and others, Ed. L.V. Chernets. - 2nd ed. revised and add. - M .: Higher school, 2006 .-- p. 33-45.

128. Cheshihin-Vetrinsky, V. Gr. Alexey N. Tolstoy. Lame master. NS. T. V. M., 1914 // Bulletin of Europe. - 1915. - No. 2. - p. 438.

129. Chulkov, G. Leaf fall // Chulkov G. Valtasar's kingdom. - M .: Republic, 1998, -p. 392-395.

130. Chukovsky, K. Poet of infertility // Chukovsky K. A book about contemporary writers. - SPb .: "Rosehip", 1914. - p. 73-88.

131. Stern, M. S. In search of the lost harmony. Prose by I.A. Bunin 1930-1940s - Omsk, 1997.

132. Schekoldin, F. Al.Budishchev. Fractures of Love // ​​Contemporary. - 1914. - No. P. -s. 124.

133. Shchukin, V.G. The myth of the noble nest. Geocultural research on Russian classical literature. - Krakow: Wydawnictwo Universytetu Jagiellonskiego, 1997.

134. Shchukin, V.G. About two cultural models of the Russian noble estate // Slowianie Wschodni: Duchowosc - Kultura - Jezyk. - Krakow, 1988 .-- c. 169-175.

135. Shchukin, V.G. Poetry of the estate and prose of the slum // From the history of Russian culture: T. 5: 19 century. - M., 1996.

136. Eichenbaum, B.M. Boldinskie fables of Pushkin // Eikhenbaum, B.M. About literature. Works of different years. - M .: Soviet writer, 1987 .-- p. 343-347.

137. Eichenbaum, B.M. About M. Kuzmin's prose // Eikhenbaum, B.M. Through literature: Sat. st. - L .: Academia, 1924 .-- p. 196-200.

138. Yaschenko, A. The Secret of Love in Modern Literature (S. Gorodetsky, Count Al.N. Tolstoy, K. Balmont) // New Life. - 1911. - No. 7. - p. 111136.

139. I. History. Culturology. Philosophy. Memoiristics.

140. Bakhtin, M.M. From rough notebooks // Literary study. - 1992. - No. 5-6.-p. 153-156.

141. Berdyaev, N.A. Psychology of the Russian people // Berdyaev N.A. Russian idea. The fate of Russia. - M .: JSC "Svarog and K", 1997. - p. 226-302.

142. Bible Encyclopedia - M .: "OLMA-PRESS", 2002.

143. Bushkevich, S. P. Rooster // Slavic mythology. Encyclopedic Dictionary. - M .: Ellis Lack, 1995 .-- p. 307-308.

144. Vinogradova, L.N. Trinity // Slavic mythology. Encyclopedic Dictionary. M .: Ellis Lack, 1995 .-- p. 375-377.

145. Gefter, M. Ya. Life is a memory. From the epilogue // XX century and the world. - M., 1996. - No. 1.-p. 78-80.

146. Noble and merchant rural estate in Russia XVI XX centuries: Historical essays. - M .: Editorial URSS, 2001.

147. Noble nests of Russia. History, culture, architecture. Essays. / Ed.-comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2000.

148. Dmitrieva, E.E., Kuptsova, ON. Life of the Manor Myth: Paradise Lost and Regained. - M .: OGI, 2003.

149. Drabkin, Ya.S. In memory of M.Ya. Gefter // Research Institute. - 1995. - No. 5. - p. 113129.

150. Dukhovskaya, L. D. The last noble nests // Noble nests of Russia. History, culture, architecture. Essays. Ed.-comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2000. - p. 345-377.

151. Evangulova, O.S. Image and word in the artistic culture of the Russian estate // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 2 (18). Sci. ed. etc. and. n. L.V. Ivanova. - M .: "AIRO-XX", 1996. -p. 42-50.

152. Evangulova, O.S. Artistic "Universe" of the Russian estate. - M .: Progress-Tradition, 2003.

153. Simmel, G. From "An Excursion on the Sociology of Feelings" (translated by K. A. Levinson) // New Literary Review. - No. 43 (3). - 2000. - with. 5-13.

154. Zlochevsky, G. Russian estate on the pages of pre-revolutionary publications // Monuments of the Fatherland. The world of the Russian estate. - 1993 .-- p. 77-87.

155. Ivanov, V.V., Toporov, V.N. Anchutka // Slavic mythology. Encyclopedic Dictionary. - M .: Ellis Lack, 1995 .-- p. 35.

156. Ivanov, Viach. Ancient horror // Ivanov Viach. Dionysus and Pradionisism. - SPb., 2000.

157. Ivanov, Viach. Native and universal. - M .: Republic, 1994.

158. Kazhdan, T.P. Some features of the Russian merchant estate of the late XIX - early XX century // Russian estate: Sat. Societies for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 2 (18). Sci. ed. etc. and. n. L.V. Ivanova. - M .: "AI-RO-XX", 1996, -p. 78-89.

159. Kazhdan, T.P. The artistic world of the Russian estate. - M .: Tradition, 1997.

160. Kolesnikova, V. Holidays of Orthodox Russia. - M., 1998.

161. Corman, B.O. Study of the text of a work of art. For stud. correspondence students III-IV facts rus. language and ped. in-tov. - M .: Education, 1972.

162. Kots, E.S. Serf intelligentsia. - L .: "Sower" book publishing house, 1926.

163. Kuznetsova, Yu.M. Russian noble estate. Economic, political and socio-cultural aspects of electr. resource .: Deut. floor. XVIII-early. XIX centuries: Dis. Cand. ist. Sciences: 07.00.02. - Samara, 2005.

164. Kuchenkova, V. Russian estates. - Tambov: Proletarian light, 2001.

165. Lavrent'eva, E.V. Everyday life of the nobility of the Pushkin era. Signs and superstitions. Moscow: Young Guard, 2006.

166. Lazareva, E.M. Russian estate // Culturology. XX century. Digest. Dialogue of cultures and human spiritual development. IV. - M .: INION, 1999. p. 106-110.

167. Levinson, A. Five letters about the smell // New literary review. - №43 (3). - 2000. -with. 14-33.

168. Likhachev, D.S. Gardens and parks // Likhachev, D.S. Favorites: Great Heritage; Notes about Russian. - SPb .: Publishing house "Logos", 1997. - p. 502-509.

169. Losev, A.F. Aphrodite // Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia in 2 volumes - Vol. 1. - M .: Soviet encyclopedia, 1992 .-- p. 132-135.

170. Losev, A.F. Myth. Number. Essence. - M .: Publishing house "Mysl", 1994.

171. Lotman, Yu.M. Conversations about Russian culture. Life and traditions of the Russian nobility (18th early 19th centuries). - St. Petersburg: "Art - St. Petersburg", 1997.

172. Meletinsky, E.M. The poetics of myth. - M .: Nauka, 1976.

173. Merezhkovsky, D.S. Love in Leo Tolstoy and Dostoevsky // Russian Eros, or Philosophy of Love in Russia. - M .: Progress, 1991 .-- p. 151-166.

174. The world of the Russian estate. Essays. - M .: Nauka, 1995.

175. Muravyova, O.S. How the Russian nobleman was brought up. - SPb .: "Neva" magazine "-" Summer garden ", 1999.

176. Nashchokina, M.V. Russian estate - Temporary and eternal // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2003. - p. 7-21.

177. Nashchokina, M.V. Russian manor park of the era of symbolism (On the formulation of the problem) // Russian manor: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina.N. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2001. - p. 7-40.

178. Novikov, V.I. Specificity of the Russian literary estate // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2003. - p. 403-407.

179. Okhlyabinin, S. D. Everyday life of a Russian estate in the 19th century. Moscow: Young Guard, 2006.

180. Landowners' Russia according to the notes of contemporaries. Compiled by N.N.Rusov. - M .: Izd-e Mosk. book publishing t-va "Education", 1911.

181. Ponomareva, M.V. Noble estate in the cultural and artistic life of Russia electr. resource .: XVIII XIX centuries: Dis. ... Cand. ist. Sciences: 24.00.01. -M, 2005.

182. Popova, M. S. Russian noble estate in the context of the mentality of Russian culture (on the example of the Arkhangelskoe estate). Abstract of the thesis. Candidate dissertation cultural studies. - M., 2004 .-- 24.00.01.

183. Popova, M. S. Russian noble estate in the context of the mentality of Russian culture electr. resource .: On the example of the Arkhangelskoe estate: Dis. ... Cand. kulturol. Sciences: 24.00.01. - M., 2004.

184. Rasskazova, J1.B. "The courtyard, the village and the house were one family" // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 12 (28). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2006. -p. 15-24.

185. Rasskazova, J1.B. Russian noble estate as a national phenomenon // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 11 (27). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2005. -p. 7-16.

186. Rubinstein, SL. Fundamentals of General Psychology. - M., 1989.

187. Russian estates. Issue 2. Petrovskoe / Sketch, comp. book M.M. Golitsyn. - SPb, 1912.

188. Savinova, E.N. The social phenomenon of the "merchant estate" // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2003. - p. 123-130.

189. Sokolova, V.K. Spring-summer calendar rites of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians. - M .: Nauka, 1979.

190. Sokolova, L. P. Music in a Russian estate in the first half of the 18th century // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 723 .. Number of authors. Ed. comp. MV Nashchokina - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2001. -p. 144-152.

191. Soloviev, Vl. The meaning of love // ​​Russian Eros, or Philosophy of Love in Russia. -M., 1991. -p. 19-77.

192. Sternin, G.Yu. On the study of the cultural heritage of a noble estate // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 2 (18). Sci. ed. etc. and. n. L.V. Ivanova. - M .: "AIRO-XX", 1996, - p. 10-15.

193. Sternin, G.Yu. The estate in the poetics of Russian culture // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 1 (17). - M.- Rybinsk, 1994, -p. 46-52.

194. Stylization // Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Ed. 3rd. vol. 24, book. 1. - M .: Ed. "Soviet Encyclopedia", 1976. - p. 512-513.

195. Tahoe-Godi, A.A. Ariadne // Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia in 2 volumes - Vol. 1. - M .: Soviet Encyclopedia, 1992. - with LOZ.

196. Toporov, V.N. Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image. Research in the field of mythopoetic. - M., 1995.

197. Toporov, V.N. Petersburg and the "Petersburg text of Russian literature" (Introduction to the topic) // Toporov V.N. Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image. Research in the field of mythopoetic. - M., 199 5. - p. 259.

198. Toporov, V.N. Rooster // Myths of the peoples of the world. Encyclopedia in 2 volumes - M .: Sov. enz., 1992. - T. 2. - p. 309-310.

199. Toporov, V.N. Numbers // Myths of the peoples of the world. - Encyclopedia in 2 volumes -M .: Sov. enz, 1992. -T. 2.-p. 629-631.

200. Troitsky, V.Yu. Stylization // Word and Image. Sat. Art. Compiled by V.V. Kozhevnikov. - M .: Education, 1964. - p. 164-194.

201. Tsvetaeva, A.I. Memories of the writer P. Romanov // Russians. - 1992. -№3 -4. -with. 89-93.

202. Chulkov, G. The Secret of Love // ​​Chulkov G. Works: v.5. - SPb., 1912 .-- p. 207-216.

203. Chulkov, G. Memories // Chulkov G. Years of wanderings. - M., 1999. - p. 405-420.

204. Shmelev, A.A. The estate of a poor nobleman in Russian literature of the XIX century // Russian estate: Sat. Society for the Study of the Russian Estate. Issue 7 (23). Number of authors. Sci. ed. comp. M.V. Nashchokina. - M .: Publishing house "Giraffe", 2003. -p. 408-418.

205. Shchukin, V.G. The concept of the House among the early Slavophiles // Slavophilism and modernity. Sat. articles. SPb .: Nauka, 1994. - p. 33-47.

Please note that the above scientific texts are posted for information and obtained by means of recognition of the original texts of dissertations (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors associated with the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

A bit of history
A manor in the Russian tradition is a separate settlement, a complex of residential, utility, park and other buildings, as well as, as a rule, a manor park, which make up a single whole. The term "estate" refers to the possessions of Russian noblemen of the 17th - early 20th centuries, it is believed that it originated from the Russian verb "to sit down".
The first mention of the estate in documents refers to 1536. In a separate book in June 1536, the division of the estates of the Obolensky princes between relatives in the Bezhetsk district is recorded. From the text it turns out that there was a homestead near the village of Dgino.
Thus, the history of the Russian estate goes back almost six centuries. According to researchers, the estate took root on Russian soil because it invariably remained for the owner a corner of the world, mastered and equipped for himself.
The ancestral estate is not just a country house and the land adjacent to it, but also a spiritual territory, where a variety of events in the life of the family are collected and captured. Everyday worries, happy holidays, family celebrations, work and leisure hours - all this was captured and passed through the centuries, recalling the history of the family. The estate is like a small homeland of a person, where several generations of his ancestors lived.

Our present with you
Unfortunately, now the concept of "homestead" is practically lost. We live in city apartments, being city dwellers in the second or third generation, and even if we go out of town to a site, it can hardly be called a "backyard". But more and more often, modern people come to understand what kind of history means to them. Building a “family nest” is the first step towards restoring the former role of the family estate, preserving and respecting the history of our ancestors.

In modernized suburban construction, the so-called "cottage villages" prevail, which are actively built up with houses made of stone, glass, metal and plastic. Yes, it is practical, effective, stylish, but, as they say, the Russian spirit does not live there and does not smell of Russia. Not to mention the lack of environmental friendliness of such buildings.

However, not so long ago, wooden construction in the Russian style experienced the first stage of revival.

Fortunately, already at the end of the past century and with the onset of the new millennium, the traditions of the Russian estate began to revive among those who like to lead a country lifestyle, surrounded by nature, in the midst of peace and quiet. And the very environment in such housing is conducive to peace and tranquility.

What can a modern manor be like?
The meaning of a modern estate can be formulated as a separate land tenure with a complex of residential, economic, park and other buildings, including the estate park - a single whole (family) estate that has absorbed all the triumph of progress, and at the same time, without forgetting about the traditional values ​​of Russian architecture ...

So, the estate is a complex system of buildings on a plot of at least 30 acres. Central house, outbuildings, guest houses, bathhouse, garage, gazebos, boiler room, autonomous power plant, garden, squares, pond, etc.

Of course, the central residential building has its own special requirements. Being the center of the estate and the ancestral estate of future generations, this house should be expressive enough from the point of view of the exterior, reliable and durable from a constructive point of view.

Life on a family estate, as mentioned, presupposes a change of generations of its owners, but it may also be the case that three families will live in good harmony under one roof at once. This task, of course, is being successfully solved by the verified design of the central building.

Naturally, the issue of its operation - the availability of life support systems - is on the same level with the design of the estate. The estate must be provided with power supply, heating and sewerage systems in such a way that the owners of the house think about them as little as possible, and the maintenance staff would take over the daily operation.

Summing up, we can say that today the "family nest" is a fairly large land plot with a master's house, a place for rest and various outbuildings. Modern suburban settlements are being built with a well-thought-out infrastructure, all the benefits of civilization are available to their residents, but one thing remains unchanged - life in harmony with nature and with oneself. Endless expanses, green or snow-covered fields, natural reservoirs, horseback riding and boating do not cease to be in demand.


Editor's Choice
How the rating is calculated ◊ The rating is calculated based on points awarded in the last week ◊ Points are awarded for: ⇒ visiting ...

Every day leaving home and going to work, to the store, or just for a walk, I am faced with the fact that a large number of people ...

From the beginning of its state formation, Russia was a multinational state, and with the annexation of new territories to Russia, ...

Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy. Born on August 28 (September 9) 1828 in Yasnaya Polyana, Tula province, Russian Empire - died on 7 (20) ...
The Buryat National Theater of Song and Dance "Baikal" appeared in Ulan-Ude in 1942. Initially it was the Philharmonic Ensemble, from its ...
Mussorgsky's biography will be of interest to everyone who is not indifferent to his original music. The composer changed the course of development of the musical ...
Tatiana in the novel in verse by A.S. Pushkin's "Eugene Onegin" is truly the ideal of a woman in the eyes of the author himself. She is honest and wise, capable ...
Appendix 5 Quotes characterizing the characters Savel Prokofich Dikoy 1) Curly. It? It scolds the Wild nephew. Kuligin. Found...
Crime and Punishment is the most famous novel by F.M. Dostoevsky, who made a powerful revolution in public consciousness. Writing a novel ...